RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Phase 2, randomized, double‐blind study of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine in patients with untreated, higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O120682270

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The prognosis of patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains poor despite available therapies. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated activity in patients with MDS and in vitro synergy with azacitidine.
      A phase 2 randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of azacitidine and pracinostat was conducted in patients who had International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate‐2–risk or high‐risk MDS. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate by cycle 6 of therapy.
      Of 102 randomized patients, there were 51 in the pracinostat group and 51 in the placebo group. The median age was 69 years. The CR rate by cycle 6 of therapy was 18% and 33% (P = .07) in the pracinostat and placebo groups, respectively. No significant differences in overall survival (median, 16 vs 19 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.66‐2.23) or progression‐free survival (11 vs 9 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.546‐1.46) were observed between groups. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred more frequently in the pracinostat group (98% vs 74%), leading to more treatment discontinuations (20% vs 10%).
      The combination of azacitidine with pracinostat did not improve outcomes in patients with higher‐risk MDS. Higher rates of treatment discontinuation may partially explain these results, suggesting alternative dosing and schedules to improve tolerability may be required to determine the potential of the combination. Cancer 2017;123:994–1002. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
      The combination of azacitidine with pracinostat does not improve outcomes in patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Higher rates of treatment discontinuation may partially explain these results.
      See also pages 911‐4.
      번역하기

      The prognosis of patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains poor despite available therapies. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated activity in patients with MDS and in vitro synergy with azacitidine. A phase 2 rand...

      The prognosis of patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains poor despite available therapies. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated activity in patients with MDS and in vitro synergy with azacitidine.
      A phase 2 randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of azacitidine and pracinostat was conducted in patients who had International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate‐2–risk or high‐risk MDS. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate by cycle 6 of therapy.
      Of 102 randomized patients, there were 51 in the pracinostat group and 51 in the placebo group. The median age was 69 years. The CR rate by cycle 6 of therapy was 18% and 33% (P = .07) in the pracinostat and placebo groups, respectively. No significant differences in overall survival (median, 16 vs 19 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.66‐2.23) or progression‐free survival (11 vs 9 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.546‐1.46) were observed between groups. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred more frequently in the pracinostat group (98% vs 74%), leading to more treatment discontinuations (20% vs 10%).
      The combination of azacitidine with pracinostat did not improve outcomes in patients with higher‐risk MDS. Higher rates of treatment discontinuation may partially explain these results, suggesting alternative dosing and schedules to improve tolerability may be required to determine the potential of the combination. Cancer 2017;123:994–1002. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
      The combination of azacitidine with pracinostat does not improve outcomes in patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Higher rates of treatment discontinuation may partially explain these results.
      See also pages 911‐4.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼