택견 발달 과정에서 나타난 현실적 갈등에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose of this study is to find what is real Taekgyeon and con flict situation who talked the related Taekkyun training people through an analysis on the conflict structure in the modernization of Taekgyeon and also the researcher tried to consider direction and role of Taekgyeon of the modern world in the future and the researcher categorized 4 high ranks subject and 8 low ranks subject. The researcher drew a conclusion through face-to-face talk among qualitative research and the results are as follows. First, high rank is ``One way and two human cultural assets.`` and low ranks are ``The reason for doing Taekgyeon together.`` and ``Correcting training system of leading one-man.`` Second, high rank is ``Forming faction and holding each other in check.`` and low ranks are ``Separating each other in the first competition.`` and ``Drifting apart each other by selecting next human cultural asset.`` Third, high rank is ``Each cultural asset associations of deepen ing conflict.`` and low ranks are ``The fight for the outside extension.`` and ``Arguing legitimacy.`` Fourth, high rank is ``Pain for consolidation.`` and low ranks are ``Taking the advantageous position first about the system of Taekgyeon.`` and ``Never-ending check each other.`` In conclusion, the researcher could confirm that each Taekgyeon associations do not stop the conflict for the past 25 years after Taekgyeon was designated as intangible cultural asset. Currently, each Taekgyeon associations have different opinions about consolidation and Taekgyeon match rule and also they hope to keep their`s system and maintaining or acquiring vested rights and insist their`s legitimacy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Giddens, A., "현대사회학" 을유문화사 2002

2 한국학중앙연구원, "한국사 기초 사전" 한국학중앙연구원 2011

3 한국학중앙연구원, "한국민족문화대백과" 한국학중앙연구원 2009

4 국립특수교육원, "특수교육학 용어사전" 하우 2009

5 전상진, "통합은 사회 갈등과 문제의 해결책?" 한독사회과학회 16 (16): 229-256, 2006

6 여덕, "택견이야기" 학민사 2007

7 정재성, "택견의 전통성 문제" 한국체육철학회 11 (11): 135-170, 2003

8 임영모, "택견의 발달 과정에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 교육대학원 2001

9 정경화, "택견원론" 보경문화사 2002

10 정만영, "택견 전수단체의 현황과 기예의 비교" 1 (1): 71-101, 2007

11 오장환, "택견 전수교본" 영언문화사 1991

12 임동권, "중요무형문화재 조사 보고서 제146호" 문화재청 1982

13 정재성, "전통무예로서 택견의 특성" 한국체육학회 46 (46): 89-98, 2007

14 윤여탁, "신자유주의에 따른 스포츠의 상업성에 관한 비판적 고찰" 한국체육학회 43 (43): 55-64, 2004

15 서울특별시사편찬위원회, "서울지명사전" 2009

16 이승수, "무형문화재 택견 전승자의 계보 연구" 한국체육사학회 14 (14): 1-14, 2009

17 이보형, "무형문화재 전수 실태조사④" 한국문화예술진흥원 11 (11): 1983

18 천대윤, "갈등관리와 협상전략론" 선학사 2005

19 김정행, "武道지침서" 대한미디어 2007

20 송덕기, "傳統武術 택견" 書林文化社 1983

21 Deutsch, M., "Productive and Destructive Conflict, In Management of Change & Conflict" Penguin Books Ltd 1972

22 Coser, L. A., "Conflict: Social Aspects, In Inthernational Encyclopedia of the Social Science" Macmillan 3-, 1968

23 Edward, J. A., "Conflict: Psychology aspects, international encyclopedia of the social" Macmillian and free press 1968

24 Thomas, K., "Conflict and Conflict Management in Dunnette, In Handbook of industrial and Organizational Psychology" Rand Mcnally 1976

25 Minnery, J. R., "Conflict Management in Urban Planning" Gower Publishing company Limited 1985

26 김평국, "After Typer: 교육과정 이론화 1970-2000년" 문음사 2006