RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      重齋 金榥의 『詩經餘義』에 반영된 『詩經』 認識과 접근 양상 = A Study on the Characteristics of Understanding and Approaches to the Book of Songs Reflected in Kim Hwang’s Si-gyeong-yeo-ui(詩經餘義), Exegesis on the Book of Songs

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to examine the characteristics of Kim Hwang’s understanding of the Book of Songs as reflected in his Si-gyeong-yeo-ui(詩經餘義), the Exegesis on the Book of Songs and to explore its implications for the understanding of the Book ...

      This paper aims to examine the characteristics of Kim Hwang’s understanding of the Book of Songs as reflected in his Si-gyeong-yeo-ui(詩經餘義), the Exegesis on the Book of Songs and to explore its implications for the understanding of the Book of Songs in 19th and 20th century Korea. Kim Hwang’s understanding of the Book of Songs and his approach exhibit a spirit of continuous inquiry, seeking the essence through constant doubt, an open attitude that goes beyond the factions of ancient and modern exegesis, and a consciousness of comparing the annotations of Korean scholars with those of China. While inheriting traditional methods and spirit of classical exegesis, there is a proactive effort to reflect the contemporary era in specific analysis and application methodologies.
      In the context of the history of Korean exegesis on the Book of Songs, Kim Hwang’s analysis of the Book of Songs revolves around the Shi-ji-zhuan(詩集傳) with its distinctive problem recognition and rigorous textual examination. Although there are other annotations of the Book of Songs from a similar period with similar concerns, each of them reflects their unique problem recognition and approaches to the classics, exhibiting clear differentiations. For example, while Park Mun-ho’s Expatiation of Shi-ji-zhuan deeply analyzes the Book of Songs within the framework and interpretation of the Shi-ji-zhuan. Kim Hwang’s Exegesis on the Book of Songs reflects a process of questioning and reviewing Zhu-xi’s opinion on the Book of Songs. Similarly, while Seok Jeong Yi Jeong-jik’s approach to the Book of Songs focuses on comparing and distinguishing between Mao’s Commentary, Zheng Xuan’s Annotations, Kong, Ying-da’ Explanations, and Zhu-xi’s Shi-ji-zhuan, Kim Hwang’s approach to the Book of Songs emphasizes a critical skepticism based on the spirit of doubt and cautiousness, as well as attention to a wide range of interpretations and arbitration. Particularly significant is the intensive examination of Jeong Yak-yong’s interpretations from an equal standpoint to other influential traditional commentators, demonstrating that the reading of the Book of Songs during the Joseon Dynasty actively continued through the modern era to the present day.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼