The beginning of Chosun film criticism before libertion from Japan was discussed in the article of 〈Chunghyangjeon〉. Of course the jonalism article was shown from 1903. And this style film article or film criticism was continuously written untill ...
The beginning of Chosun film criticism before libertion from Japan was discussed in the article of 〈Chunghyangjeon〉. Of course the jonalism article was shown from 1903. And this style film article or film criticism was continuously written untill it's film criticism coming out in 1923.
After Dir. Na, Unkyu's film work, 〈Arirang〉 Chosun film world was it.s full glory and the movement of proletaria arts appearing stimulated the change of Chosun's film criticism They who follow the ideology of the proletaria arts make the intense discusion of film criticism on dir. Na's work 〈Arirang Ⅱ〉 during three months. The first discussion of film criticism started between Seo, Gwangje and Lee, Pilwoow, the second discussion continued Yun, gijeong and Na, Ungyu. Through this discussion we can fined the difference of their conscious of Chosun film critic and also we confirmed the discurse of Chosun film criticism at that time.
After or before the discussion the world of Chosun filmcriticism was begining changed. Their conscious of filmcritic for actual function of sociality was retrograded. Especially in sound film's period Chosun film criticism emphasised technological part. After all the end of Japanese's rulling period Chosun film critics gave up their duty for society.
In this thesis I studies on the present situation of Chosun film criticism by the pointview of the history of Chosun film criticism. As the result I can look all around the social function of Chosun film criticism and the social influence by film criticism. And I can judge the level of the form of Chosun film criticism and actual function of it.