1920-30년대 상해 공공조계 행정 체계의 변화 = Transition of Administrative System of Shanghai International Settlement in 1920-30

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Mixed Court and Extra-Settlement Road in Shanghai International Settlement show us that there was no strict restriction or limitation of influence of the administration of International Settlement, since it could easily bypass physical boundary of the settlement, or even limitation for settlement administration. However, this system faced critical challenge from 1925, when foreign police of the International Settlement fired upon Chinese protesters.
The Shanghai Chamber of Commerce almost immediately addressed their 13 demands, including unconditional and complete return of the Shanghai Mixed Court, though western ambassadors at pekin legation quarter did not agreed this. nevertheless, in Shanghai, the Shanghai Municipal Council tried to make common interest between westerners and prominent Chinese.
At last from 1927, the Shanghai Mixed Court was abolished, and the Shanghai Provisional Court replaced it. The new court maitained many previous regulations and customs, and the influence of the police of the International Settlement still could not be ignored. However, Chinese people in and around the Settlement continued to demand their representation in settlement administration, and therefore, the present administrative system had no other way but to change itself.
The construction of extra-settlement roads and administration of the SMC upon extra-settlement road areas were still continued in 1920s. SMC sent its police to maintain order in those areas, and took special taxes for supplying water or electricity. But the Chinese local government in Chapei area strengthened its influences in the same areas, by sending their own police forces and supplying their own city infrastructure. The Shanghai Chamber of Commerce, including in their 13 demands, requested to complete ban of constructing new extra-settlement road and return already built extra-settlement road. SMC tried to maintain status quo to defend their own interest, but they actually had no any counter-measure.
Finally in July 1931 the SMC and the Shanghai local government made an provisional agreement that the local government take full right to police the areas and supply city infrastructure, while the SMC could send their police. Nevertheless, with the Japanese consul’s disagree, this agreement never accepted, and the whole matter was delayed until the Sino-Japanese war started.
In result, after the May Thirtieth Movement, the existing administrative system of the Shanghai International Settlement was inevitably transformed into totally different form. It had to accept the Chinese representation in the SMC, while abandoned its influences in the Mixed Court and in the extra-settlement road areas.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 戴鞍鋼, "電報電話与近代上海及江南" (4) : 2013

2 樊果, "陌生的守夜人――上海公共租界工部局经济职能研究" 天津古籍出版社 2012

3 張笑川, "近代上海閘北居民社会生活" 上海辞書出版社 2009

4 陳雲連, "近代上海の都市形成史" 風響社 2018

5 陳雲連, "近代上海の都市形成史" 風響社 2018

6 "申報"

7 蔡暁栄, "清末民初上海会審公廨中美商民的混合訴訟及交渉" (1) : 2019

8 島田正郎, "清末における近代的法典の編纂" 創文社 1980

9 滋賀秀三, "清代中国の法と裁判" 創文社 1984

10 郭まいか, "民国期の上海会審公廨における手続きと慣例について" 73 (73): 2014

11 植田捷, "支那における租界の研究" 巌松堂書店 1941

12 吉澤誠一郎, "愛国とボイコット" 名古屋大学出版会 2021

13 이승휘, "五卅事件과 上海公共租界工部局" 21 : 2004

14 大里浩秋, "中国・朝鮮における租界の歴史と建築遺産" 御茶の水書房 2010

15 姚遠, "上海租界与租界法権" 上海三聯書店 2016

16 高橋孝助, "上海史――巨大都市の形成と人々の営み" 東方書店 1998

17 上海市政研究会, "上海共同租界工部局公共事業特約" 上海市政研究会 1942

18 上海市公用事業管理局, "上海公用事業(1840-1968)" 上海人民出版社 1991

19 上海市檔案館, "上海公共租界工部局理事会会議録" 上海古籍出版社 2001

20 蒯世勲, "上海公共租界史稿" 上海人民出版社 1980

21 蒯世勲, "上海公共租界史稿" 上海人民出版社 1980

22 奚霞, "一戦期間上海各界呼吁収回上海会審公堂史料一组" (4) : 2004

23 本野英一, "モリソンパンフレットの世界" 東洋文庫 2017

24 Meyer, Kathryn, "Trade and Nationality at Shanghai upon the Outbreak of the First World War, 1914-1915" 10 (10): 1988

25 "The North-China Herald"

26 "The China Weekly Review"

27 "The China Press"

28 Jackson, Isabella, "Shaping Modern Shanghai : Colonialism in China’s Global City" Cambridge University Press 2018

29 Anatol M. Kotenev, "Shanghai: Its Municipality and the Chinese" North-China Daily News & Herald 1927

30 Anatol M. Kotenev, "Shanghai: Its Mixed Court and Council" North-China Daily News & Herald 1925

31 Feetham, Richard, "Report of the Hon. Richard Feetham, C. M. G., Judge of the Supreme Court of the Union of South Africa, to the Shanghai Municipal Council" North-China Daily News and Herald 1932

32 Shanghai Municipal Council, "Report for the year 1929 and Budget for the year 1930" Kelly & Walsh 1930

33 Shanghai Municipal Council, "Report for the year 1927 and Budget for the year 1928" Kelly & Walsh 1928

34 Great Britain, Foreign Office, "Political and Other Departments, General Correspondence before 1906, China, FO17/974"

35 Frederic Wakeman Jr, "Policing Shanghai, 1927-1937" University of California Press 1995

36 Thomas B. Stephens, "Order and Discipline in China: The Shanghai Mixed Court, 1911-27" University of Washington Press 1992

37 Shanghai Municipal Council, "Handbook of Municipal Information" Shanghai Municipal Council 1937

38 Bickers, Robert, "Empire Made Me: An Englishman adrift in Shanghai" Columbia University Press 2003

39 村田省一, "20世紀中国の社会システム" 京都大学人文科学研究所 2009

40 김태승, "1930年代 以前 上海 公共租界의 支配構造와 華人参政運動" 58 : 1997

41 劉京, "1930年上海公共租界工部局水費加価始末及分析" (5) : 2010