RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공영방송의 공정성ㆍ중립성과 언론의 자유 보장에 관한 고찰 -일본 공영방송 법제의 법적 구조 분석을 중심으로- = A Study on the Fairness and Neutrality of Public Broadcasting and the Guarantee of Freedom of Speech -Centered on the Analysis of the Legal Structure of Public Broadcasting Legislation-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109453123

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Regardless of public and private broadcasting, broadcasting must guarantee freedom of expression or freedom of speech, but fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting are required in that information delivered to the general public should be objective and fair. Such broadcasting fairness, fairness, and neutrality require a kind of content justification added to freedom of expression and freedom of speech, and are sometimes recognized as opposing logic. However, since the logic and value of the opposite are compatible, the proper function of broadcasting can be performed for the first time. Considering administrative and criminal sanctions as a means to ensure fairness, fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting, it can lead to unfair interference and intervention by administrative or political, and may undermine or infringe on freedom of expression or freedom of speech.
      The purpose of this article is to examine what measures are needed to balance the value of fairness, fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting with freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Therefore, I would like to introduce and examine Japanese broadcasting legislation, especially public broadcasting legislation, and analyze what measures are taken under Japanese law to ensure fairness, fairness, neutrality, and freedom of speech. Specifically, the broadcasting law stipulating Japan's public broadcasting and the legal structure of the Japan Broadcasting Association (NIPPON HOSOKYOKAI) established, organized and operated under the law are the main analysis targets. The issue of this analysis is about the autonomy of broadcasting derived from freedom of expression and speech and the regulations on broadcasting that confront it. In other words, it aims to draw implications for the value judgment and institutional composition important in discussing fairness, fairness, neutrality and freedom of expression in public broadcasting by considering the neutrality and independence of public broadcasting.
      번역하기

      Regardless of public and private broadcasting, broadcasting must guarantee freedom of expression or freedom of speech, but fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting are required in that information delivered to the general public should be objective an...

      Regardless of public and private broadcasting, broadcasting must guarantee freedom of expression or freedom of speech, but fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting are required in that information delivered to the general public should be objective and fair. Such broadcasting fairness, fairness, and neutrality require a kind of content justification added to freedom of expression and freedom of speech, and are sometimes recognized as opposing logic. However, since the logic and value of the opposite are compatible, the proper function of broadcasting can be performed for the first time. Considering administrative and criminal sanctions as a means to ensure fairness, fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting, it can lead to unfair interference and intervention by administrative or political, and may undermine or infringe on freedom of expression or freedom of speech.
      The purpose of this article is to examine what measures are needed to balance the value of fairness, fairness, and neutrality of broadcasting with freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Therefore, I would like to introduce and examine Japanese broadcasting legislation, especially public broadcasting legislation, and analyze what measures are taken under Japanese law to ensure fairness, fairness, neutrality, and freedom of speech. Specifically, the broadcasting law stipulating Japan's public broadcasting and the legal structure of the Japan Broadcasting Association (NIPPON HOSOKYOKAI) established, organized and operated under the law are the main analysis targets. The issue of this analysis is about the autonomy of broadcasting derived from freedom of expression and speech and the regulations on broadcasting that confront it. In other words, it aims to draw implications for the value judgment and institutional composition important in discussing fairness, fairness, neutrality and freedom of expression in public broadcasting by considering the neutrality and independence of public broadcasting.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼