The constitutional draft of the EU represents remarkable progress compared with the current Treaty of Nice. From a political perspective, the proposed "Constitutional Treaty" has the attributes more of an international treaty tha...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76464425
2005
-
349
KCI등재
학술저널
47-58(12쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The constitutional draft of the EU represents remarkable progress compared with the current Treaty of Nice. From a political perspective, the proposed "Constitutional Treaty" has the attributes more of an international treaty tha...
The constitutional draft of the EU represents remarkable progress compared with the current Treaty of Nice. From a political perspective, the proposed "Constitutional Treaty" has the attributes more of an international treaty than a constitution, and reflects rather incomplete constitutionalism. The EU constitution is regarded as a carefully contrived compromise between the supranational federalist and intergovernmentalist positions. The proposed EU Constitution has grown out of constitutional politics strategically constructed by the core Member States, whose national governments have driven the process of EU constitution-making. We argue here that it is the major Member State-led constitutional politics underlying hegemonic intergovernmental governance that will continue to prevail, and that the concept of EU constitutional federalism seems, at present, to be a rather far off goal.
목차 (Table of Contents)
Maritime Security in East Asia - Major Issues and Regional Responses
The Impact of NGOs on South Korea"s Decision to Dispatch Troops to Iraq
Explaining Argentina’s Regional Trade Policy-making in 1999