RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      종교의 기원에 관한 과학적 연구 - 마이클 아빕과 매리 헤세, 월터 버커트, 어거스틴 푸엔테스의 기포드 강연들을 중심으로 - = The Scientific Study on the Origin of Religion: Focusing on the Gifford Lectures of Michael Arbib, Marry Hesse, Walter Burkert, and Augustin Fuentes

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107354839

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Is the dialogue between religion and science necessary? The question sounds outdated, since the dialogue has been animated from the early 20th century. However, the skepticism in relation to the dialogue is still pervasive in university contexts. The students of liberal art college, at least in South Korea, are mostly indifferent to religion as well as science. The situation of students in natural science and engineering are not different. Nevertheless, this article claims that the dialogue between religion and science should be promoted. For human is innately religious from the perspectives of cognitive science, biology, and anthropology. To argue that, this article examines three Gifford lectures given respectively by Michael Arbib, Mary Hesse, Walter Burkert, and Augustin Fuentes, who propose scientific models (i.e. cognitive science, biology, and anthropology) with regard to the origin of religion. The examination on the Gifford lectures will contribute to developing our domestic study on dialogue between religion and science. Furthermore, this attempt will help to advocate the reality and meaningfulness of religion in an era of scientific naturalism, which questions the validity of religion.
      번역하기

      Is the dialogue between religion and science necessary? The question sounds outdated, since the dialogue has been animated from the early 20th century. However, the skepticism in relation to the dialogue is still pervasive in university contexts. The ...

      Is the dialogue between religion and science necessary? The question sounds outdated, since the dialogue has been animated from the early 20th century. However, the skepticism in relation to the dialogue is still pervasive in university contexts. The students of liberal art college, at least in South Korea, are mostly indifferent to religion as well as science. The situation of students in natural science and engineering are not different. Nevertheless, this article claims that the dialogue between religion and science should be promoted. For human is innately religious from the perspectives of cognitive science, biology, and anthropology. To argue that, this article examines three Gifford lectures given respectively by Michael Arbib, Mary Hesse, Walter Burkert, and Augustin Fuentes, who propose scientific models (i.e. cognitive science, biology, and anthropology) with regard to the origin of religion. The examination on the Gifford lectures will contribute to developing our domestic study on dialogue between religion and science. Furthermore, this attempt will help to advocate the reality and meaningfulness of religion in an era of scientific naturalism, which questions the validity of religion.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼