헌법상 개인정보의 법적성질과 보호범위에 관한 연구 = A Constitutional Study of the Legal Aspects and the Protection Scope of the Informational Privacy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

To clarify the concept of privacy(personal information, personal data) would help define it’s legal aspects between the scope of fundamental rights, personality, liberty and property. At the same time it could be helpful to clarify the limits of privacy. The fundamental rights target different objects which are based on the clarity of the legal concept of the privacy depending on how you set the policy direction of the legislation can be changed around.
Privacy rights in the United States are belonged to the liberties basically, however after the concept of the informational privacy appeared, the American privacy rights taking after and accommodating its concept to the that of Europe in many areas. In Europe, the human dignity ranks on the highest value of the fundamental rights. However, the absolute fundamental rights protect narrowly in the legal area more conservative then any others.
In the end, the United States and European privacy laws are different, but it is misunderstanding that the United States underestimate person’s privacy. The United States believe private autonomy should think the top priority thus, the subject of a specific fundamental right to be protected when the government interferes less. Whether privacy belonged any fundamental rights, in this informational society, privacy protection is more emphasis inevitably on important values.
Even Though a privacy right could understand as the right of personality, it could be in the area of property at the same time. Privacy should be protected by its unique character.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

2 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2011

3 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2011

4 문재완, "프라이버시 보호: 신화에서 규범으로, 개인정보보호법제 개선을 위한 정책연구보고서" 2013

5 이한주, "퍼블리시티권에 관하여" 39 : 2004

6 박준석, "지적재산권법에서 바라본 개인정보 보호" 2013

7 이해완, "저작권법" 박영사 699-, 2012

8 권영준, "저작권과 소유권의 상호관계: 독점과 공유의 측면에서" 3 (3): 2010

9 박진근, "재산권규정의 재해석을 통한 재산권 최고규범으로서 사적 자치" 한국법정책학회 12 (12): 1287-1311, 2012

10 Volke, "The Concept of Freedom of Information in International Guarantees of Human Rights" 1979

11 Regan, "Social Values, and Public Policy" University of North Carolina Press 1995

12 Schwartz, "Property, Privacy, and Personal Data" 117 (117): 2004

13 Paul M. Schwartz, "Property, Privacy and Personal data" 117 : 2004

14 Palmela Samuelson, "Privacy As Intellectual Property?" 52 : 1995

15 Haag, "Nomos XIII: Privacy" Atherton Press 1971

16 "Media & Ent. L.J. 69, Autumn"

17 Kenneth C. Laudon, "Markets and Privacy" 39 (39): 1996

18 Macpherson, "Human Rights as Property Rights" Routledge 2002

19 Eberle, "Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law" 963 : 1997

20 Böhmer, "Grundfragen der verfassungsrechtlechen Gewährleistung des Eigentums in der Rechtsprechung des BVerfG"

21 Russom, "Concepts of Privacy at the Intersection of Technology and Law(the Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science)" University of Illinois 2012

22 Hoffman, "Computer and Privacy in the Next Decade" Academic Press 1980

23 Leisner, "Bestandsgarantie des Eigentums" DVBL 1988

24 Eltis, "BREAKING THROUGH THE 'TOWER OF BABEL: A 'RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN' AND HOW TRANS-SYSTEMIC THINKING CAN HELP RE-CONCEPTUALIZE PRIVACY HARM IN THE AGE OF ANALYTICS,' 22 Fordham Intell"