RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Light verbs in korean and hindi: the locality problem as an epiphenomenon of the surface case resolution

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104912421

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Jongsup Jun. 2006. Light Verbs in Korean and Hindi: The Locality Problem as an Epiphenomenon of the Surface Case Resolution. Language and Linguistics 37, 209-232. A well-known property of the Korean light verb construction (=LVC) is the locality misma...

      Jongsup Jun. 2006. Light Verbs in Korean and Hindi: The Locality Problem as an Epiphenomenon of the Surface Case Resolution. Language and Linguistics 37, 209-232. A well-known property of the Korean light verb construction (=LVC) is the locality mismatch between theta-marking and case-marking on the accusative-marked theme; e.g. Kim paksa-ka mullihak-ul yenkwu-lul hayssta 'Dr. Kim studied physics'. The accusative theme receives its theta-role inside the verbal noun phrase (=VNP), but seems to be case- marked by a verbal element outside the VNP. Interestingly, the locality problem never occurs in the Hindi LVC. In this paper, I develop a case theory under the framework of conceptual semantics (Jackendoff 1990, 1997, 2002) to explain why the locality problem occurs in one language, and not in another. In this theory, case is assigned in the syntactic and semantic modules independently; case alternation results from the mismatch between syntactic case and semantic case. The theme argument receives syntactic genitive inside the VNP, and semantic accusative because it is lower in rank in the thematic hierarchy than the actor argument. Korean allows case alternation when syntactic case conflicts with semantic case. We set up the parameter in the opposite direction for Hindi; i.e. Hindi realizes only the syntactic case when syntactic case does not match its semantic counterpart. This simple parameter shows that the locality problem is merely an epiphenomenon of the surface case resolution

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "the hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax" of (of): 49-74, 1993

      2 "Two types of noun incorporation" 294-2 317, 1989a

      3 "Theta operations and the syntax of multiple complement constructions in Korean Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IV" Harvard Univ 433-445, 1991

      4 "The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory" 369-411, 1987a

      5 "The light verb construction in Japanese Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society" 231-247, 1991

      6 "The Syntactic Feature of Argument Transfer with Suru" Univ 1991a

      7 "The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu" CSLI Publications 1995

      8 "The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar:Evidence from Romance" CSLI Publications 1996

      9 "The Locality Mismatch in the Light Verb Construction in Korean and Hindi" Harvard Univ 77-94, 2004

      10 "The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology" Univ of Chicago Press 1996

      1 "the hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax" of (of): 49-74, 1993

      2 "Two types of noun incorporation" 294-2 317, 1989a

      3 "Theta operations and the syntax of multiple complement constructions in Korean Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IV" Harvard Univ 433-445, 1991

      4 "The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory" 369-411, 1987a

      5 "The light verb construction in Japanese Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society" 231-247, 1991

      6 "The Syntactic Feature of Argument Transfer with Suru" Univ 1991a

      7 "The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu" CSLI Publications 1995

      8 "The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar:Evidence from Romance" CSLI Publications 1996

      9 "The Locality Mismatch in the Light Verb Construction in Korean and Hindi" Harvard Univ 77-94, 2004

      10 "The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology" Univ of Chicago Press 1996

      11 "The Architecture of the Language Faculty" MIT Press 1997

      12 "Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function" Cambridge Univ Press 1997

      13 "Syntactic and Semantic Bases of Case Assignment:A Study of Verbal Nouns Light Verbs and Dative" Brandeis University 2003

      14 "Reprint in 1971" 1937

      15 "Properties of verbal nouns and category status in Japanese" Stanford Univ 1990

      16 "Patterns in the Mind" Basic Books 1994

      17 "Parsing light verb constructions in lexical- functional grammar" 535-566, 1993

      18 "On the status of Ha-ta in multiple complement structures" Hanshin Publishing Company 3 : 531-544, 1995

      19 "On the so-called 'light' verb suru in Japanese Working Papers of Linguistics" Univ 324-339, 1992

      20 "On the Wordhood of Complex Predicates in Japanese" Stanford Univ 1992a

      21 "On head movement in Japanese the case of verbal nouns Proceedings of Sophia Linguistic Society 6" (buko) : 8-32, 1991

      22 "Negation and Clausal Architecture in Korean and English" Univ 1991

      23 "Multidimensionality of representation: NV complex predicates in Hindi" CSLI Publications 431-471, 1997

      24 "Light verbs and argument structures" Harvard Univ 542-551, 2001

      25 "Kuke Mumpep" Hanyang Univ Press 1996

      26 "Korean Journal of Linguistics" 4-2, 1979

      27 "Incorporation and Argument Structure in Japanese" Univ 1990

      28 "Ha-uy thuksengkwa kyengswule kwumun [Properties of ha- and light predicate constructions]" 32 (32): 409-476, 1996

      29 "Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning Grammar Evolution" Oxford Univ Press 2002

      30 "Derivation of the N-suru compound" Univ 1991b

      31 "Current English Linguistics in Japan" 169-203, 1991

      32 "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" Univ of Chicago Press 1995

      33 "Complex predicates in Urdu" CSLI Publications 107-149, 1997

      34 "Complex Predicate Formation with Verbal Nouns in Japanese and Korean Argument Transfer at LF" Univ 1993

      35 "Causatives in Bantu and Romance" CSLI Publications 203-246, 1997

      36 "Case-marking on duration adverbials revisited" Kyungjin Munhwasa 323-335, 2001

      37 "Case in tiers" 217-2 250, 1987

      38 "Case and word order variations in nominal clauses" 359-380, 1992

      39 "Arguments in Hindi Published in 1994 as Argument Structure in Hindi" Stanford Univ 1990

      40 "Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean" Stanford Univ 1991

      41 "A syntactic account of light verb constructions in Japanese" Tokyo Christian Univ 1992b

      42 "A Study of Phrase Structure The MIT Press" 1977

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-06-09 학회명변경 영문명 : Language Rearch Institute(LRI) -> Language Research Institute(LRI) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.37 0.37 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.39 0.4 0.704 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼