Evaluation of responses of semi-rigid frames at target displacements predicted by the nonlinear static analysis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Responses of semi-rigid frames having different degrees of semi-rigidity obtained by the nonlinear static analysis (NSA) are evaluated at specific target displacements by comparing them with those obtained by the nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA) for scaled earthquakes. The peak ground accelerations (PGA) of the earthquakes are scaled such that the obtained peak top story displacements match with the target displacements. Three different types of earthquakes are considered, namely, far-field and near-field earthquakes with directivity and fling-step effects. In order to make the study a comprehensive one, three degrees of semi-rigidity (one fully rigid and the other two semi-rigid), and two frames having different heights are considered. An ensemble of five-time histories of ground motion is included in each type of earthquake. A large number of responses are considered in the study. They include the peak top-story displacement, maximum inter-story drift ratio, peak base shear, total number of plastic hinges, and square root of sum of the squares (SRSS) of the maximum plastic hinge rotations. Results of the study indicate that the nonlinear static analysis provides a fairly good estimate of the peak values of top-story displacements, inter-story drift ratio (for shorter frame), peak base shear and number of plastic hinges; however, the SRSS of maximum plastic hinge rotations in semi-rigid frames are considerably more in the nonlinear static analysis as compared to the nonlinear time history analysis.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Nihan Doǧramacı Aksoylar, "The design and seismic performance of low-rise long-span frames with semi-rigid connections" Elsevier BV 67 (67): 114-126, 2011

2 M.E. Lemonis, "Steel moment resisting frames with both joint and beam dissipation zones" Elsevier BV 147 : 224-235, 2018

3 A.M Mwafy, "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings" Elsevier BV 23 (23): 407-424, 2001

4 Sharma, V., "Sensitivity of lateral load patterns on the performance assessment of semi-rigid frames" 2019

5 Brunesi, E., "Seismic response of MRFs with partially-restrained bolted beam-tocolumn connections through FE analyses" 107 : 37-49, 2015

6 Mohammad Bayat, "Seismic performance of mid-rise steel frames with semi-rigid connections having different moment capacity" 국제구조공학회 25 (25): 1-17, 2017

7 Sharma, V., "Seismic energy dissipation in semi-rigid connected steel frames" 2019

8 A.S. Elnashai, "Seismic behaviour of semi-rigid steel frames" Elsevier BV 29 (29): 149-174, 1994

9 J.C. Awkar, "Seismic analysis and response of multistory semirigid frames" Elsevier BV 21 (21): 425-441, 1999

10 Faridmehr, I., "Seismic Performance of Steel Frames with Semirigid Connections" 2017

11 Joseph M. Bracci, "Seismic Performance and Retrofit Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures" American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 123 (123): 3-10, 1997

12 "SP-6-1, SP-6-1 Handbook for Structural Engineers -Part-1 Structural Steel Sections"

13 "SAP2000v21,Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design"

14 Foti, D., "Response of frames seismically protected with passive systems in near-field areas" 5 (5): 326-345, 2014

15 R Hasan, "Push-over analysis for performance-based seismic design" Elsevier BV 80 (80): 2483-2493, 2002

16 Diaferio, M., "Performance of seismic shear panels under near-field motions" 7 (7): 196-200, 2018

17 Foti, D., "On the seismic response of protected and unprotected middle-rise steel frames in far-field and near-field areas" 2014

18 Andréa R. D. Silva, "On the Nonlinear Transient Analysis of Planar Steel Frames with Semi-Rigid Connections: From Fundamentals to Algorithms and Numerical Studies" FapUNIFESP (SciELO) 15 (15): 1-29, 2018

19 Chan, S., "Nonlinear static and cyclic analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections" Elsevier 2000

20 Krolo, P., "Nonlinear seismic analysis of steel frame with semi-rigid joints" 67 (67): 573-583, 2015

21 S.-H Hsieh, "Nonlinear analysis of three-dimensional steel frames with semi-rigid connections" Elsevier BV 41 (41): 995-1009, 1991

22 Diaferio, M., "Mechanical behavior of buildings subjected to impulsive motions" 14 (14): 849-862, 2016

23 Dora Foti, "Local ground effects in near-field and far-field areas on seismically protected buildings" Elsevier BV 74 : 14-24, 2015

24 "IS-875, Part 1: DEAD LOADS — UNIT WEIGHTS OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND STORED MATERIALS"

25 "IS-800, General Construction in Steel-Code of Practice (Third Revision)"

26 "IS-1893, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision)"

27 Juan C. Reyes, "How Many Records Should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 Ground Motion Scaling Procedure?" SAGE Publications 28 (28): 1223-1242, 2012

28 "FEMA-P695, Quantification of building seismic performance factors"

29 "FEMA-440, 440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures"

30 "FEMA-355D, State of the art report on connection performance"

31 Kunnath, S.K., "Evaluation of seismic deformation demands using nonlinear procedures in multistory steel and concrete moment frames" 41 (41): 159-181, 2004

32 "Eurocode 3, B.S., “Eurocode 3—Design of steel structures"

33 Erol Kalkan, "Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings" SAGE Publications 22 (22): 367-390, 2006

34 M. Gholipour Feizi, "Effect of semi-rigid connections in improvement of seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames" 국제구조공학회 19 (19): 467-484, 2015

35 M.N. Nader, "Dynamic behavior of flexible, semirigid and rigid steel frames" Elsevier BV 18 (18): 179-192, 1991

36 E.M. Lui, "Dynamic analysis and response of semirigid frames" Elsevier BV 19 (19): 644-654, 1997

37 R. Roldán, "Displacement-based design of steel moment resisting frames with partially-restrained beam-to-column joints" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 14 (14): 1017-1046, 2016

38 Akbar Pirmoz, "Direct displacement-based seismic design of semi-rigid steel frames" Elsevier BV 128 : 201-209, 2017

39 S. ANTONIOU, "DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION OF A DISPLACEMENT-BASED ADAPTIVE PUSHOVER PROCEDURE" Informa UK Limited 8 (8): 643-661, 2008

40 F.G.A. Al-Bermani, "Cyclic and seismic response of flexibly jointed frames" Elsevier BV 16 (16): 249-255, 1994

41 Yuxin Liu, "Compound-element modeling accounting for semi-rigid connections and member plasticity" Elsevier BV 30 (30): 1292-1307, 2008

42 Gholamreza Abdollahzadeh, "Comparing Hysteretic Energy and inter-story drift in steel frames with V-shaped brace under near and far fault earthquakes" Elsevier BV 57 (57): 301-308, 2018

43 Iman Faridmehr, "Classification System for Semi-Rigid Beam-to-Column Connections" FapUNIFESP (SciELO) 13 (13): 2152-2175, 2016

44 Vijay Sharma, "Behavior of semi-rigid steel frames under near- and far-field earthquakes" 국제구조공학회 34 (34): 625-641, 2020

45 Sharma, V., "Behavior of semi-rigid frames under seismic excitations" Indian Institute of Technology 2018

46 M. Bhandari, "Assessment of proposed lateral load patterns in pushover analysis for base-isolated frames" Elsevier BV 175 : 531-548, 2018

47 Emrah Erduran, "Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures on the estimation of torsional effects in low-rise frame buildings" Elsevier BV 30 (30): 2548-2558, 2008

48 Kalkan, E., "Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings" 29 (29): 305-316, 2007

49 Erol Kalkan, "Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Building Structures" American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 132 (132): 1721-1731, 2006

50 "ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings- Volume I"

51 "ASCE-41, ASCE 41-17: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings"

52 "ANSI/AISC-341, 341 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings"

53 "AISC-360, B, AISC 360-16, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings"

54 Mehdi Poursha, "A single-run multi-mode pushover analysis to account for the effect of higher modes in estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 13 (13): 2347-2365, 2015

55 Anil K. Chopra, "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings" Wiley 31 (31): 561-582, 2002