RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      출산경력의 불고지와 혼인 취소 사유 ―대법원 2017. 5. 16. 선고 2017므238 판결― = Concealment of Past Childbirth History as a Ground of Marriage Cancellation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107798347

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article, the comments on Korea Supreme Court Decision on May 16th 2017, Case No. 2017Meu238, treats the issue on ‘whether concealment of past childbirth history involves fraud sufficient to cancellation of marriage’.
      In the case, the wife, Vietnamese marriage-immigrant woman, had experienced childbirth in former forced marriage by means of kidnap, rape, and imprisonment at the age of 13, which is not known to her husband. When the marriage was broken up due to the repeated sexual abuse of the father-in-law and the woman filed for divorce, her husband found the past childbirth history of the wife in criminal conviction of her father-in-law, and filed a counteraction for cancellation of marriage arguing that her concealment of past childbirth history constitutes fraud and cancellation of marriage shall be granted on Korean Civil Act article 816(3).
      Korean Supreme Court had ruled on its decision on February 18th 2016, case No. 2015Meu654, 661 that the concealment of childbirth history, which has been caused by rape on her minority, cannot be regarded as fraud and the woman did not have a duty to inform the history to her husband when marriage. However, in the case, Korean High Court (the original court) which has been remanded the case, granted cancellation of marriage, on the reason that newly investigated facts show that her past childbirth has been caused not by “rape on her minority”, but “her marriage”. This decision was finally affirmed by Korea Supreme Court.
      This article argues that concealment of past childbirth history itself, whether it was caused by rape on minority or not, shall not be a ground of marriage cancellation, as the past childbirth history cannot be ‘the essential elements of marriage’. This article further argues that the forced marriage by kidnap or rape on minority should not be regarded as “marriage”. Thus this article reaches the conclusion that Korea Supreme Court’s final decision in the case should be criticized and reconsidered.
      번역하기

      This article, the comments on Korea Supreme Court Decision on May 16th 2017, Case No. 2017Meu238, treats the issue on ‘whether concealment of past childbirth history involves fraud sufficient to cancellation of marriage’. In the case, the wife, Vi...

      This article, the comments on Korea Supreme Court Decision on May 16th 2017, Case No. 2017Meu238, treats the issue on ‘whether concealment of past childbirth history involves fraud sufficient to cancellation of marriage’.
      In the case, the wife, Vietnamese marriage-immigrant woman, had experienced childbirth in former forced marriage by means of kidnap, rape, and imprisonment at the age of 13, which is not known to her husband. When the marriage was broken up due to the repeated sexual abuse of the father-in-law and the woman filed for divorce, her husband found the past childbirth history of the wife in criminal conviction of her father-in-law, and filed a counteraction for cancellation of marriage arguing that her concealment of past childbirth history constitutes fraud and cancellation of marriage shall be granted on Korean Civil Act article 816(3).
      Korean Supreme Court had ruled on its decision on February 18th 2016, case No. 2015Meu654, 661 that the concealment of childbirth history, which has been caused by rape on her minority, cannot be regarded as fraud and the woman did not have a duty to inform the history to her husband when marriage. However, in the case, Korean High Court (the original court) which has been remanded the case, granted cancellation of marriage, on the reason that newly investigated facts show that her past childbirth has been caused not by “rape on her minority”, but “her marriage”. This decision was finally affirmed by Korea Supreme Court.
      This article argues that concealment of past childbirth history itself, whether it was caused by rape on minority or not, shall not be a ground of marriage cancellation, as the past childbirth history cannot be ‘the essential elements of marriage’. This article further argues that the forced marriage by kidnap or rape on minority should not be regarded as “marriage”. Thus this article reaches the conclusion that Korea Supreme Court’s final decision in the case should be criticized and reconsidered.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장다혜, "혼인취소를 둘러싼 젠더 폭력의 중층적 구성: 강제결혼 피해여성의 출산경력 불고지로 인한 혼인취소 인정판결을 중심으로" 한국여성연구소 18 (18): 47-100, 2018

      2 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" 박영사 2020

      3 김주수, "친족상속법" 법문사 2020

      4 최준규, "출산 경력의 불고지가 혼인취소 사유에 해당하는지 여부 ―대법원 2016.2.18. 선고 2015므654, 661 판결―" 한국가족법학회 31 (31): 307-362, 2017

      5 "주해친족법" 박영사 2015

      6 정현미, "아동성폭력으로 인한 출산경력과 혼인취소의 법적 쟁점과 정책적 과제" 법학연구소 20 (20): 131-153, 2015

      7 양현아, "식민주의의 견지에서 본 2000년 여성국제법정: 일본군 성노예제라는 ‘전시 성폭력’" 민주주의법학연구회 (75) : 69-123, 2021

      8 신기숙, "성폭력 피해아동의 피해경험" 한국심리학회 30 (30): 1255-1287, 2011

      9 소라미, "성폭력 피해결과인 출산경력의 미고지가 혼인 취소 사유에 해당하는지 여부"

      10 조은희, "사기에 의한 혼인취소에 있어서 고지의무" 법과정책연구원 23 (23): 231-260, 2017

      1 장다혜, "혼인취소를 둘러싼 젠더 폭력의 중층적 구성: 강제결혼 피해여성의 출산경력 불고지로 인한 혼인취소 인정판결을 중심으로" 한국여성연구소 18 (18): 47-100, 2018

      2 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" 박영사 2020

      3 김주수, "친족상속법" 법문사 2020

      4 최준규, "출산 경력의 불고지가 혼인취소 사유에 해당하는지 여부 ―대법원 2016.2.18. 선고 2015므654, 661 판결―" 한국가족법학회 31 (31): 307-362, 2017

      5 "주해친족법" 박영사 2015

      6 정현미, "아동성폭력으로 인한 출산경력과 혼인취소의 법적 쟁점과 정책적 과제" 법학연구소 20 (20): 131-153, 2015

      7 양현아, "식민주의의 견지에서 본 2000년 여성국제법정: 일본군 성노예제라는 ‘전시 성폭력’" 민주주의법학연구회 (75) : 69-123, 2021

      8 신기숙, "성폭력 피해아동의 피해경험" 한국심리학회 30 (30): 1255-1287, 2011

      9 소라미, "성폭력 피해결과인 출산경력의 미고지가 혼인 취소 사유에 해당하는지 여부"

      10 조은희, "사기에 의한 혼인취소에 있어서 고지의무" 법과정책연구원 23 (23): 231-260, 2017

      11 "베트남 출신 이주여성 아동성폭력으로 인한 출산경험과 혼인취소사건 지원사례 백서" 사단법인 한국이주여성인권센터

      12 "법원실무제요 가사 [Ⅱ]" 법원행정처 2010

      13 소라미, "결혼 이주여성의 인권 실태와 한국 법제도 현황에 대한 검토" 법학연구원 16 (16): 43-74, 2009

      14 Thomas J. Walsh, "The Law of the Family in Vietnam: Assessing the Marriage and Family Law of Vietnam" 42 (42): 2011

      15 David M. Cotter, "Misrepresenting or Concealing Prior Marital History as a Ground for Annulment" 16 (16): 219-, 2004

      16 "J. von Staudingers Kommentar Zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz Und Nebengesetzen"

      17 Radhika Coomaraswamy, "Cultural practices in the family that are violent towards women, Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, UN Commission on Human Rights, submitted in accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 2001/49: 31 January 2002, E/CN.4/2002/83"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-06-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
      2005-06-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.87 0.87 0.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.77 0.758 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼