Exploring an innovative evaluation method to ensure the quality of spatial data needed at the distribution stage: focused on building and road map in South Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aimed to suggest a method to evaluate the quality of spatial data in order to increase the interoperability of national geospatial data. The national geospatial data is managed by the government and is provided to the public according to the Spatial Data Industry Promotion Act. Although the quality control is necessary in the every processing steps including data production, processing, distribution, and service. This paper focused data quality only on the distribution stage. The evaluation rules suitable for national geospatial data were derived by comparing and analyzing domestic and foreign standards for data quality. Then, the quality diagnosis were carried out using commercial software. Two diagnostic methods were applied to test data quality. One is ‘Layer-based Approach’ that requires a comparison between two layers and the other is ‘Geometry-based Approach’ that diagnose feature geometries in a single layer. The diagnostic methods have been applied to the building and road layers in Seoul. In conclusion, this paper presented the standard quality evaluation rules and criteria that could be applied immediately for spatial data distribution industry, although some of items checked by direct visual inspection. Later, it is expected all quality evaluation rules are fully automated.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이보미, "국가지리정보 품질관리 대상 및 방법론 제시" 국토지리학회 51 (51): 135-148, 2017

2 김재명, "공간정보 기기 품질인증을 위한 기초연구" 대한공간정보학회 19 (19): 33-43, 2011

3 Carson, C., "What is data quality? A distillation of experience" Statistics Department, International Monetary Fund

4 Jung, Y. C., "The data economy revitalization strategy in the fourth industrial revolution" Korea Information Society and Development Institute 2017

5 Wu, C., "The Republic of Korea is going to be changed" National Information Society Agency 2018

6 Caprioli, M., "Rules and standards for spatial data quality in GIS environment" 2003

7 Hunter, G. J., "Research trends in geographic information science" Springer 2009

8 Choi, Y., "Research on the establishment of a system for quality certification of spatial information" Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport 2010

9 NGII, "Regulations for working with topologic map"

10 NGII, "Regulations for performance test of public measurements" National Geographic Information Institute 2017

11 Jung, I., "Quality evaluation methods and verification for enhancing the utilization of indoor spatial information" University of Seoul 2017

12 Ghose, M. K., "Product quality assureance for GIS lifecycle" 2002

13 MOLIT, "Implementation plan of the national spatial information policy in 2019" Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 2018

14 Gervais, M., "Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery" CRC Press 99-115, 2009

15 Servigne, S., "Fundamentals of spatial data quality" ISTE Ltd 179-210, 2006

16 Pocas, I., "Evaluating the fitness for use of spatial data sets to promote quality in ecological assessment and monitoring" 28 (28): 2356-2371, 2014

17 Michael F. Goodchild, "Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 69 (69): 211-221, 2007

18 F. Arabi Aliabad, "Assessment of the fuzzy ARTMAP neural network method performance in geological mapping using satellite images and Boolean logic" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 16 (16): 3829-3838, 2019

19 Musungu, K., "Assessing spatial data quality of participatory GIS studies: A case study in Cape Town" 75-82, 2015

20 Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), "ArcGIS Online Help"

21 Kim, J., "A study on the quality certification of three-dimensional spatial information" University of Seoul 2012

22 Lee, S., "A study on the improvement of domestic R&D data quality management system" University of Seoul 2016

23 Forghani, M., "A quality study of the OpenStreetMap dataset for Tehran" 3 : 750-763, 2014