RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Clinical outcomes of two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: culture-negative versus culture-positive

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107966349

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The effect of negative culture on the treatment outcomes of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the outcomes of two-stage revision in culture-negative chronic PJI differ from those in culture-positive PJI.The patients who received two-stage revisions due to chronic PJI during the period between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The culture-negative and culture-positive PJI group included 57 cases and 79 cases, respectively. The demographic data, as well as reoperation, mortality, reinfection, and failure rates of each group were evaluated.
      There was a significant difference in reoperation rate between the two groups for the period from the first-stage surgery to the second-stage revision arthroplasty ( p = 0.045). The reoperation rate of the culture-positive group was 25.3% (20/79) whereas that of the culture-negative group was 10.5% (6/57). Among the 136 PJI cases, 97 cases (71.3%) received reimplantation surgery (culture-negative group, 43 cases; culture-positive group, 54 cases). No significant difference was noted between the culture-negative and culture-positive groups with respect to the number of cases that did not undergo reimplantation surgery and the reoperation, reinfection, mortality, and failure rates after two-stage surgery ( p > 0.05, all parameters).
      The culture outcome had no significant effect on the outcome of the two-stage revision in patients with chronic PJI. The reoperation rate after first-stage surgery was significantly higher in the culture-positive group, but the overall failure rate did not significantly differ in both the groups. The presence of a negative culture might be a good prognostic factor for chronic PJI.
      번역하기

      The effect of negative culture on the treatment outcomes of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the outcomes of two-stage revision in culture-negative chronic PJI differ...

      The effect of negative culture on the treatment outcomes of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the outcomes of two-stage revision in culture-negative chronic PJI differ from those in culture-positive PJI.The patients who received two-stage revisions due to chronic PJI during the period between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The culture-negative and culture-positive PJI group included 57 cases and 79 cases, respectively. The demographic data, as well as reoperation, mortality, reinfection, and failure rates of each group were evaluated.
      There was a significant difference in reoperation rate between the two groups for the period from the first-stage surgery to the second-stage revision arthroplasty ( p = 0.045). The reoperation rate of the culture-positive group was 25.3% (20/79) whereas that of the culture-negative group was 10.5% (6/57). Among the 136 PJI cases, 97 cases (71.3%) received reimplantation surgery (culture-negative group, 43 cases; culture-positive group, 54 cases). No significant difference was noted between the culture-negative and culture-positive groups with respect to the number of cases that did not undergo reimplantation surgery and the reoperation, reinfection, mortality, and failure rates after two-stage surgery ( p > 0.05, all parameters).
      The culture outcome had no significant effect on the outcome of the two-stage revision in patients with chronic PJI. The reoperation rate after first-stage surgery was significantly higher in the culture-positive group, but the overall failure rate did not significantly differ in both the groups. The presence of a negative culture might be a good prognostic factor for chronic PJI.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sharkey PF, "Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?" 29 (29): 1774-1778, 2014

      2 이용석, "Two­-Stage Reimplantation in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty" 대한슬관절학회 30 (30): 107-114, 2018

      3 Petis SM, "Twostage exchange protocol for periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty in 245 knees without prior treatment for infection" 101 (101): 239-249, 2019

      4 Li H, "Two-stage revisions for culture-negative infected total knee arthroplasties : a five-year outcome in comparison with one-stage and two-stage revisions for culture-positive cases" 22 (22): 306-312, 2017

      5 Ibrahim MS, "Two-stage revision for the culturenegative infected total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study" 100-B (100-B): 3-8, 2018

      6 Bejon P, "Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection : predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology" 65 (65): 569-575, 2010

      7 Kuzyk PR, "Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection : techniques, controversies, and outcomes" 22 (22): 153-164, 2014

      8 Lichstein P, "Treatment of periprosthetic knee infection with a two-stage protocol using static spacers" 474 (474): 120-125, 2016

      9 Kim YH, "The outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty : culture-positive versus culture-negative" 135 (135): 1459-1467, 2015

      10 Gomez MM, "The fate of spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection" 97 (97): 1495-1502, 2015

      1 Sharkey PF, "Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?" 29 (29): 1774-1778, 2014

      2 이용석, "Two­-Stage Reimplantation in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty" 대한슬관절학회 30 (30): 107-114, 2018

      3 Petis SM, "Twostage exchange protocol for periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty in 245 knees without prior treatment for infection" 101 (101): 239-249, 2019

      4 Li H, "Two-stage revisions for culture-negative infected total knee arthroplasties : a five-year outcome in comparison with one-stage and two-stage revisions for culture-positive cases" 22 (22): 306-312, 2017

      5 Ibrahim MS, "Two-stage revision for the culturenegative infected total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study" 100-B (100-B): 3-8, 2018

      6 Bejon P, "Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection : predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology" 65 (65): 569-575, 2010

      7 Kuzyk PR, "Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection : techniques, controversies, and outcomes" 22 (22): 153-164, 2014

      8 Lichstein P, "Treatment of periprosthetic knee infection with a two-stage protocol using static spacers" 474 (474): 120-125, 2016

      9 Kim YH, "The outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty : culture-positive versus culture-negative" 135 (135): 1459-1467, 2015

      10 Gomez MM, "The fate of spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection" 97 (97): 1495-1502, 2015

      11 Bozic KJ, "The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States" 468 (468): 45-51, 2010

      12 Parvizi J, "The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection : an evidence-based and validated criteria" 33 (33): 1309-1314, 2018

      13 Azeem Tariq Malik, "Seasonal Influence on Postoperative Complications after Total Knee Arthroplasty" 대한슬관절학회 30 (30): 42-49, 2018

      14 박형진, "Safety of Temporary Use of Recycled Autoclaved Femoral Components in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Confirming Sterility Using a Sonication Method" 대한정형외과학회 10 (10): 427-432, 2018

      15 Malekzadeh D, "Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection" 468 (468): 2039-2045, 2010

      16 Choi HR, "Periprosthetic joint infection with negative culture results : clinical characteristics and treatment outcome" 28 (28): 899-903, 2013

      17 Kapadia BH, "Periprosthetic joint infection" 387 (387): 386-394, 2016

      18 Parvizi J, "New definition for periprosthetic joint infection : from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society" 469 (469): 2992-2994, 2011

      19 Haleem AA, "Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty" 428 : 35-39, 2004

      20 Hakim J, "Long-term outcome of total knee arthroplasty in patients with morbid obesity" 44 (44): 95-104, 2018

      21 Reisener M, "Do culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections have a worse outcome than culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis" 2018

      22 Osmon DR, "Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America" 56 (56): e1-e25, 2014

      23 Parvizi J, "Definition of periprosthetic joint infection" 29 (29): 1331-, 2014

      24 Berbari EF, "Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection" 45 (45): 1113-1119, 2007

      25 Huang R, "Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude infection control" 470 (470): 2717-2723, 2012

      26 Tan TL, "Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection : an update on what to expect" 3 (3): e0060-, 2018

      27 Kim YH, "Comparison of infection control rates and clinical outcomes in culture-positive and culture-negative infected total-knee arthroplasty" 12 (12): S37-S43, 2015

      28 Young­-Joon Choi, "Comparison of Revision Rates Due to Aseptic Loosening between High-­Flex and Conventional Knee Prostheses" 대한슬관절학회 30 (30): 161-166, 2018

      29 Wang J, "Comparable outcome of culturenegative and culture-positive periprosthetic hip joint infection for patients undergoing two-stage revision" 42 (42): 469-477, 2018

      30 정희진, "Clinical Guidelines for the Antimicrobial Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections in Korea" 대한감염학회 46 (46): 125-138, 2014

      31 Della Valle C, "American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee" 93 (93): 1355-1357, 2011

      32 Rhee SJ, "A comparison of long-term outcomes of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 101 (101): 1875-1885, 2019

      33 윤홍권, "A Review of the Literature on Culture­Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment" 대한슬관절학회 29 (29): 155-164, 2017

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-05-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한슬관절학회지 -> Knee Surgery and Related Research
      외국어명 : journal of korean knee society -> Knee Surgery and Related Research
      KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.23 0.528 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼