RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업이질성에 근거한 수출 참여 예측: 딥러닝을 이용한 시계열 분류 = Prediction of Export Participation Based on Firm Heterogeneity: Time Series Classification with Deep Learning

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107230415

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This study is to predict firms’ export participation based on firm heterogeneity, considering the situation where many countries around the world try to promote firms’ entry to export markets from the perspective of heterogeneous firm trade framework these days.
      Research design, data, and methodology: We used the 13-year time series data from the business activity survey produced by the Statistics Korea. Total factor productivity, financial leverage, and R&D expenditure were used as input variables and export participation was used as an output variable for time series classification with deep learning. We have trained and compared the three deep learning models for time series classification: multi layer perceptron, fully convolutional network, and residual network. We implemented the models using the open source deep learning library Keras with the Tensorflow back-end. The models’ performance was evaluated using the mean of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score over the 10 runs on the testing data set.
      Results: The results showed that the fully convolutional network (FCN) architecture performs best for the time series classification task and the recall is higher than the precision. The accuracy of the best model is 0.86, the precision is 0.64, the recall is 0.80, and the F1-score is 0.71.
      Conclusions: This study contributes to promoting the understanding of deep learning approach to prediction of export participation in the context of heterogenous firm trade theory. The prediction focuses on the selection of non-exporting firms, from the perspective of policy orientation for excavating and making firms without exporting start exporting. We propose to be able to utilize the FCN for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of export promotion policies, in particular focused on increase in firms’ export participation, by interpreting three of the indicators being used for model evaluation, precision, recall, and F1-score, in the context of such policy.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study is to predict firms’ export participation based on firm heterogeneity, considering the situation where many countries around the world try to promote firms’ entry to export markets from the perspective of heterogeneous firm tra...

      Purpose: This study is to predict firms’ export participation based on firm heterogeneity, considering the situation where many countries around the world try to promote firms’ entry to export markets from the perspective of heterogeneous firm trade framework these days.
      Research design, data, and methodology: We used the 13-year time series data from the business activity survey produced by the Statistics Korea. Total factor productivity, financial leverage, and R&D expenditure were used as input variables and export participation was used as an output variable for time series classification with deep learning. We have trained and compared the three deep learning models for time series classification: multi layer perceptron, fully convolutional network, and residual network. We implemented the models using the open source deep learning library Keras with the Tensorflow back-end. The models’ performance was evaluated using the mean of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score over the 10 runs on the testing data set.
      Results: The results showed that the fully convolutional network (FCN) architecture performs best for the time series classification task and the recall is higher than the precision. The accuracy of the best model is 0.86, the precision is 0.64, the recall is 0.80, and the F1-score is 0.71.
      Conclusions: This study contributes to promoting the understanding of deep learning approach to prediction of export participation in the context of heterogenous firm trade theory. The prediction focuses on the selection of non-exporting firms, from the perspective of policy orientation for excavating and making firms without exporting start exporting. We propose to be able to utilize the FCN for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of export promotion policies, in particular focused on increase in firms’ export participation, by interpreting three of the indicators being used for model evaluation, precision, recall, and F1-score, in the context of such policy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 METI(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), "White Paper on International Economy and Trade 2017" Trade Policy Bureau, METI 2017

      2 Zheng, Y., "Web-Age Information Management" Springer 298-310, 2014

      3 Haidar, J. I., "Trade and productivity : Self-selection or Learning-by-exporting in India" 29 (29): 1766-1773, 2012

      4 Kiriyama, N., "Trade and Innovation: Synthesis Report" OECD Publishing 2012

      5 Cernat, L., "Towards"Trade Policy Analysis 2. 0"From National Comparative Advantage to Firm-level Trade Data" 4 : 1-12, 2014

      6 Serrà, J., "Towards a Universal Neural Network Encoder for Time Series" 120-129, 2018

      7 Wang, Z., "Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baseline" 1578-1585, 2017

      8 Tanisaro, P., "Time Series Classification Using Time Warping Invariant Echo State Networks" IEEE 831-836, 2016

      9 Costantini, J., "The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy" Harvard University Press 15-36, 2007

      10 Melitz, M. J., "The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity" 71 (71): 1695-1725, 2003

      1 METI(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), "White Paper on International Economy and Trade 2017" Trade Policy Bureau, METI 2017

      2 Zheng, Y., "Web-Age Information Management" Springer 298-310, 2014

      3 Haidar, J. I., "Trade and productivity : Self-selection or Learning-by-exporting in India" 29 (29): 1766-1773, 2012

      4 Kiriyama, N., "Trade and Innovation: Synthesis Report" OECD Publishing 2012

      5 Cernat, L., "Towards"Trade Policy Analysis 2. 0"From National Comparative Advantage to Firm-level Trade Data" 4 : 1-12, 2014

      6 Serrà, J., "Towards a Universal Neural Network Encoder for Time Series" 120-129, 2018

      7 Wang, Z., "Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baseline" 1578-1585, 2017

      8 Tanisaro, P., "Time Series Classification Using Time Warping Invariant Echo State Networks" IEEE 831-836, 2016

      9 Costantini, J., "The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy" Harvard University Press 15-36, 2007

      10 Melitz, M. J., "The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity" 71 (71): 1695-1725, 2003

      11 Broocks, A., "The Impact of Export Promotion on Export Market En" 107 : 19-33, 2017

      12 Ge, J., "The Effects of GVC Embeddendness on Productivity Improvement: From the Perspective of R&D and Government Subsidy" 135 : 22-31, 2018

      13 Roberts, M. J., "The Decision to Export in Colombia : An Empirical Mode of Entry with Sunk Costs" 87 (87): 545-564, 1997

      14 Serti, F., "Self Selection among Different Export Markets" 117 (117): 102-105, 2012

      15 Bhagwati, J., "Reforms and Economic Transformation in india" Oxford University Press 2012

      16 Lapham, B., "Redesigning Canadian Trade Policies for New Global Realities. The Art of the State Series, Volume VI" Institute for Research on Public Policy 39-73, 2017

      17 Yang, C. H., "R&D, Productivity, and Exports : Plant-level Evidence from Indonesia" 29 (29): 208-216, 2012

      18 Kasahara, H., "Productivity and the Decision to Import and Export : Theory and Evidence" 89 (89): 297-316, 2013

      19 Ciuriak, D., "Policy Implications of Heterogeneous Firms Trade Theory" 2013

      20 Bernard, A. B., "Plants and Productivity in International Trade" 93 (93): 1268-1290, 2003

      21 LeCun, Y. A., "Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade" Springer 9-48, 2012

      22 Cui, Z., "Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series Classification"

      23 Costinot, A., "Micro to Macro: Optimal Trade Policy with Firm Heterogeneity" NBER 2016

      24 Foster-McGregor, N., "Learning-by-exporting versus Self-selection : New Evidence for 19 Sub-Saharan African Countries" 125 (125): 212-214, 2014

      25 Sharma, C., "International Trade and Performance of Firms : Unraveling Export, Import and Productivity Puzzle" 57 : 61-74, 2015

      26 Deng, Z., "Innovation and Survival of Exporters : A Contingency Perspective" 23 (23): 396-406, 2014

      27 Geldres-Weis, V. V., "Innovation and Experiential Knowledge in Firm Exports : Aplying the Initial U-model" 69 (69): 5076-5081, 2016

      28 Manova, K., "How Firms Export: Processing vs. Ordinary Trade with Financial Frictions" 100 : 120-137, 2016

      29 Plouffe, M., "Heterogeneous Firms and Trade-Policy Stances : Evidence from a Survey of Japanese Producers" 19 (19): 1-40, 2017

      30 Kim, H. S., "Firms’ Leverage and Export Market Participation: Evidence from South Korea" 148 : 41-58, 2016

      31 Kim, I. S., "Firms in Trade and Trade Politics" 22 : 399-417, 2019

      32 Ciuriak, D., "Firms in International Trade : Trade Policy Implications of the New New Trade Theory" 6 (6): 130-140, 2015

      33 Caggese, A., "Financing Constraints, Firm Dynamics, Export Decisions, and Aggregate Productivity" 16 (16): 177-193, 2013

      34 Chan, J. M. L., "Financial Frictions and Trade Intermediation: Theory and Evidence" 119 : 567-593, 2019

      35 Berman, N., "Financial Factors and the Margins of Trade : Evidence from Cross-country Firm-level Data" 93 (93): 206-217, 2010

      36 Greenway, D., "Financial Factors and Export Decisions" 73 (73): 377-395, 2007

      37 Bellone, F., "Financial Constraints and Firm Export Behaviour" 33 (33): 347-373, 2010

      38 Nagaraj, P., "Financial Constraints and Export Participation in India" 140 : 19-35, 2014

      39 Dzhumashev, R., "Exporting, R&D Investment and Firm Surival in the Indian IT Sector" 42 : 1-19, 2016

      40 Bernard, A. B., "Export Entry and Exit by German Firms" 137 : 105-123, 2001

      41 Bernard, A. B., "Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?" 47 (47): 1-25, 1999

      42 Levinsohn, J., "Estimating Production Functions using Inputs to Control for Unobservables" 70 (70): 317-342, 2003

      43 Montalbano, P., "Energy Efficiency, Productivity and Exporting: Firm-level Evidence in Latin America" 79 : 97-110, 2017

      44 Liu, B. J., "Do Bigger and Older Firms Learn and More from Exporting? Evidence from China" 45 : 89-102, 2017

      45 Myers, S., "Determinants of Corporate Borrowing" 5 (5): 147-175, 1977

      46 Papernot, N., "Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learning"

      47 Fawaz, H. I., "Deep Learning for Time Series Classification : A Review" 33 (33): 917-963, 2019

      48 Le Guennec, A, "Data Augmentation for Time Series Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks"

      49 Manova, K., "Credit Constraints, Heterogeneous Firms, and International Trade"

      50 Manova, K., "Credit Constraints, Heterogeneous Firms and International Trade" 80 (80): 711-744, 2013

      51 Fauceglia, D., "Credit Constraints, Firm Exports and Financial Development: Evidence from Developing Countries" 55 : 53-66, 2015

      52 DiPietro, W. R., "Creativity, Innovation, and Export Performance" 26 (26): 133-139, 2006

      53 Geng, Y., "Cost-Sensitive Convolution Based Neural Networks for Imbalanced Time-Series Classification"

      54 Myers, S., "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have" 13 (13): 187-221, 1984

      55 Zhao, B., "Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series Classification" 28 (28): 162-169, 2017

      56 Jensen, M. C., "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers" 76 (76): 323-329, 1986

      57 Kingma, D. P., "Adam: A method for stochastic optimization"

      58 Zeiler, M. D., "Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-02-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review -> Journal of Distribution and Management Research KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-03-16 학술지명변경 한글명 : 유통정보학회지 -> 유통경영학회지
      외국어명 : Korea Research Academy of Distribution Information Review -> Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review
      KCI등재
      2010-02-04 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국유통정보학회 -> 한국유통경영학회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.79 0.79 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.93 0.92 1.252 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼