RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      L2 초기학습자의 어휘력에 영향을 주는 요인들에 관한 구조적 연구 = A study on the structural relationship of factors determining L2 receptive vocabulary learning of Korean 3rd graders

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101803267

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to examine the variables which could potentially contribute to L2 receptive vocabulary learning. Also, the study sought to explore the structural relationship of those factors in L2 receptive vocabulary. Total of 113 third-graders were invited and assessed in a questionnaire survey on L2 vocabulary learning strategies. In addition, the participants took a receptive English vocabulary achievement test. The vocabulary test was composed of synonyms, antonyms, and analogies adapted from Woodcock-JohnsonⅢ Diagnostic Reading Battery (Woodcock, Mather, & Schrank, 2004) and elementary English textbook based on the 7th education curriculum. The results indicated that six factors of L2 vocabulary acquisition were found: memory and cognitive strategy, English learning attitude and willingness, parents’ interest on their children’s English learning, first language (L1) proficiency, extracurricular activities, and discovery strategy. Second, all of the six factors were positively correlated with one another. Third, L1 proficiency was a strong predicator of L2 vocabulary ability. In addition, based on the structural equation modeling (SEM), L1 proficiency showed significant effect on L2 vocabulary ability. Moreover, extracurricular activities had an indirect impact on L2 vocabulary ability as a L1 proficiency variable. These findings suggest that L1 proficiency plays a critical role in promoting L2 vocabulary proficiency. Furthermore, the results provided support for the developmental interdependence hypothesis (Cummins, 2000). Pedagogical implications were discussed further.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to examine the variables which could potentially contribute to L2 receptive vocabulary learning. Also, the study sought to explore the structural relationship of those factors in L2 receptive vocabulary. Total of 113 thir...

      The purpose of this study was to examine the variables which could potentially contribute to L2 receptive vocabulary learning. Also, the study sought to explore the structural relationship of those factors in L2 receptive vocabulary. Total of 113 third-graders were invited and assessed in a questionnaire survey on L2 vocabulary learning strategies. In addition, the participants took a receptive English vocabulary achievement test. The vocabulary test was composed of synonyms, antonyms, and analogies adapted from Woodcock-JohnsonⅢ Diagnostic Reading Battery (Woodcock, Mather, & Schrank, 2004) and elementary English textbook based on the 7th education curriculum. The results indicated that six factors of L2 vocabulary acquisition were found: memory and cognitive strategy, English learning attitude and willingness, parents’ interest on their children’s English learning, first language (L1) proficiency, extracurricular activities, and discovery strategy. Second, all of the six factors were positively correlated with one another. Third, L1 proficiency was a strong predicator of L2 vocabulary ability. In addition, based on the structural equation modeling (SEM), L1 proficiency showed significant effect on L2 vocabulary ability. Moreover, extracurricular activities had an indirect impact on L2 vocabulary ability as a L1 proficiency variable. These findings suggest that L1 proficiency plays a critical role in promoting L2 vocabulary proficiency. Furthermore, the results provided support for the developmental interdependence hypothesis (Cummins, 2000). Pedagogical implications were discussed further.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼