RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      混合法系(Mixed Legal System)와 남아공법(South African Law)의 발전 = The Legal Historical Study of the South African Law as Mixed Legal Systems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104020031

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We are not familiar with and are biased against the South Africa and the African continent. Nowadays South Africa, however, has been introduced as mixed legal systems or mixed jurisdictions which generally means that two major legal systems, civil law and English Common law, were converged on a jurisdiction. But there have been still few papers dealing with mixed legal systems and South African law in South Korea, therefore this paper defines some characters of mixed legal systems briefly and next deals with various of discussion about Vernon Parmer‘s criteria in Chapter Ⅱ.
      Next in two chapters, I introduce the South African law by using the legal historical methodology. The history of South African law before an interim constitution is reviewed first and the origin and development of Roman-Dutch law is looked at in perspective. The concept of “Roman-Dutch law” has many meanings which include, among others, the law of the province of Holland from roughly seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. According to some writers it is this law of the province of Holland which, as the law of the original colonial settlers, has formed the basis of contemporary South African law. Other writers, however, claim that it is the law of the whole of the Netherlands or even a European ius commune based on Roman law which was exported to South Africa. In my opinion, of the two approaches described above, broader view seems the more correct.
      That the course of Roman-Dutch law in South Africa is considered as well as the extent of the influence of English law which developed in the courts in England is also known as “common law (that is to say Common law)”. English Common law in this sense, however, refers neither to Roman-Dutch common law in South Africa nor to the historical ius commune of Western Europe. And the fact that South African common law is not English Common law means that South African law was not influenced by English law, in fact it is actually remarkable that English law did not replace Roman-Dutch law entirely as the common law of South Africa after the last British occupation of the Cape (in 1806) and the expansion of Britain’s colonial power in South Africa.
      Next this paper deals with Apartheid laws which functioned as a social engineering method. Racial discrimination has existed in many other societies but in the past, it was expressly written into the laws and supported by the government of South Africa. At that time, politically South Africa limited self-governing territories known as homelands. The blacks enjoyed no representation in the Central Parliament, nor in the provincial Councils which had limited legislative powers over the provinces.
      After post-Apartheid the reconstruction of the South African law through a new synthesis with both indigenous law and positive law is explained. Important changes have taken place since Nelson Mandela was released from prison. That is, Apartheid legislation was abolished and a new South African Constitution with a bill of rights was enacted, and the concept of human rights has been officially recognized in South Africa. This has brought about far-reaching changes to South African legal system.
      In conclusion, the above shows that South African law is a good example of mixed jurisdictions and then mixed jurisdictions could seem surprising in the light of the efforts underway to create a new European ius commune. In addition to, South African law suggests where the Korean law and the Asian law should go further in the future that every country’s law in Asia is going to have to be integrated for economic or cultural unity.
      번역하기

      We are not familiar with and are biased against the South Africa and the African continent. Nowadays South Africa, however, has been introduced as mixed legal systems or mixed jurisdictions which generally means that two major legal systems, civil law...

      We are not familiar with and are biased against the South Africa and the African continent. Nowadays South Africa, however, has been introduced as mixed legal systems or mixed jurisdictions which generally means that two major legal systems, civil law and English Common law, were converged on a jurisdiction. But there have been still few papers dealing with mixed legal systems and South African law in South Korea, therefore this paper defines some characters of mixed legal systems briefly and next deals with various of discussion about Vernon Parmer‘s criteria in Chapter Ⅱ.
      Next in two chapters, I introduce the South African law by using the legal historical methodology. The history of South African law before an interim constitution is reviewed first and the origin and development of Roman-Dutch law is looked at in perspective. The concept of “Roman-Dutch law” has many meanings which include, among others, the law of the province of Holland from roughly seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. According to some writers it is this law of the province of Holland which, as the law of the original colonial settlers, has formed the basis of contemporary South African law. Other writers, however, claim that it is the law of the whole of the Netherlands or even a European ius commune based on Roman law which was exported to South Africa. In my opinion, of the two approaches described above, broader view seems the more correct.
      That the course of Roman-Dutch law in South Africa is considered as well as the extent of the influence of English law which developed in the courts in England is also known as “common law (that is to say Common law)”. English Common law in this sense, however, refers neither to Roman-Dutch common law in South Africa nor to the historical ius commune of Western Europe. And the fact that South African common law is not English Common law means that South African law was not influenced by English law, in fact it is actually remarkable that English law did not replace Roman-Dutch law entirely as the common law of South Africa after the last British occupation of the Cape (in 1806) and the expansion of Britain’s colonial power in South Africa.
      Next this paper deals with Apartheid laws which functioned as a social engineering method. Racial discrimination has existed in many other societies but in the past, it was expressly written into the laws and supported by the government of South Africa. At that time, politically South Africa limited self-governing territories known as homelands. The blacks enjoyed no representation in the Central Parliament, nor in the provincial Councils which had limited legislative powers over the provinces.
      After post-Apartheid the reconstruction of the South African law through a new synthesis with both indigenous law and positive law is explained. Important changes have taken place since Nelson Mandela was released from prison. That is, Apartheid legislation was abolished and a new South African Constitution with a bill of rights was enacted, and the concept of human rights has been officially recognized in South Africa. This has brought about far-reaching changes to South African legal system.
      In conclusion, the above shows that South African law is a good example of mixed jurisdictions and then mixed jurisdictions could seem surprising in the light of the efforts underway to create a new European ius commune. In addition to, South African law suggests where the Korean law and the Asian law should go further in the future that every country’s law in Asia is going to have to be integrated for economic or cultural unity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박희호, "혼합법계의 발견과 주요 혼합법계 국가의 법체계" 법학연구소 (29) : 93-120, 2008

      2 박희호, "혼합법계로서의 필리핀 법체계에 대한 소고 - 혼합법계의 형성과정 및 그 내용을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 15 (15): 51-81, 2008

      3 송상현, "한국법과 세계화, 한국법과 세계화" 법문사 2005

      4 양창수, "한국 민법학 60년의 성과와 앞으로의 과제, 우리 민법학은 지금 어디에 서 있는가?" 박영사 2007

      5 성승현, "유럽의 契約法統一論議와 混合法系(Mixed Legal System)의 대두 -比較私法硏究에의 示唆-" 한국민사법학회 (37) : 113-143, 2007

      6 김경숙, "유럽共通法(ius commune)의 경험과 동아시아" 법학연구소 28 (28): 639-659, 2008

      7 김형배, "우리 민법학의 미래: 현대화 및 국제화와 관련하여, 우리 민법학은 지금 어디에 서 있는가?" 박영사 2007

      8 최대권, "영미법" 박영사 1991

      9 김상용, "아시아법제연구의 필요성과 방법론" 한국법제연구원 (1) : 2004

      10 조규창, "비교법(상)" 소화 2005

      1 박희호, "혼합법계의 발견과 주요 혼합법계 국가의 법체계" 법학연구소 (29) : 93-120, 2008

      2 박희호, "혼합법계로서의 필리핀 법체계에 대한 소고 - 혼합법계의 형성과정 및 그 내용을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 15 (15): 51-81, 2008

      3 송상현, "한국법과 세계화, 한국법과 세계화" 법문사 2005

      4 양창수, "한국 민법학 60년의 성과와 앞으로의 과제, 우리 민법학은 지금 어디에 서 있는가?" 박영사 2007

      5 성승현, "유럽의 契約法統一論議와 混合法系(Mixed Legal System)의 대두 -比較私法硏究에의 示唆-" 한국민사법학회 (37) : 113-143, 2007

      6 김경숙, "유럽共通法(ius commune)의 경험과 동아시아" 법학연구소 28 (28): 639-659, 2008

      7 김형배, "우리 민법학의 미래: 현대화 및 국제화와 관련하여, 우리 민법학은 지금 어디에 서 있는가?" 박영사 2007

      8 최대권, "영미법" 박영사 1991

      9 김상용, "아시아법제연구의 필요성과 방법론" 한국법제연구원 (1) : 2004

      10 조규창, "비교법(상)" 소화 2005

      11 권오승, "동아세아 공동시장의 형성과 경쟁법의 과제 in: 한국법과 세계화" 법문사 2006

      12 C.G van der Merwe, "남아프리카와 스코틀랜드 혼합법계의 세계화에 관한 기원 및 그 특징과중요성" 26 : 2006

      13 C.G van der Merwe, "남아프리카공화국의 혼합법체계 in:한국법과 세계화" 법문사 2006

      14 박영복, "글로벌시대의 계약법:국제거래와 민법이론" 집문당 2005

      15 Zhu, Weidong, "南非共和國國際私法硏究 : 一个混合法系國家的現像" 法律出版社 2006

      16 Reinhard Zimmermann, "‘Double Cross’: Comparing Scots and South African Law, in Mixed Legal Systems in Comparative Perspective" Oxford University Press 2004

      17 "http://www.polity.org.za/polity/govdocs/commissions/1998/trc/index.htm"

      18 "http://www.polity.org.za/polity/govdocs/commissions/1998/trc/4chap4.htm"

      19 "http://www.juriglobe.ca/eng/sys-juri/index-alpha.php"

      20 "http://www.doj.gov.za/trc/trccom.htm"

      21 "http://www.doj.gov.za/reports/report_list.html"

      22 "http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/bills/bills.htm"

      23 "http://countrystudies.us/south-africa/"

      24 Martin Chanock, "Writing South African Legal History: A Prospectus" 30 (30): 1989

      25 François du Bois, "Wille’s principles of South African Law (9th ed.)" JUTA 2007

      26 Vernon Valentine Palmer, "Two Rival Theories of Mixed Legal Systems" 12 (12): 2008

      27 Cassandra Fox Charles, "Truth vs. Justice"

      28 Ugo Mattei, "Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World’s Legal Systems" 45 : 5-,

      29 A. van Blerk, "The genesis of the “modernist” - “purist” debate: an historical bird’s eye view" 47 : 1984

      30 Simon Schama, "The embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age" Vintage 1997

      31 H. R. Hahlo, "The Union of South Africa: The Development of Its Laws and Constitution" JUTA 1960

      32 John B. Kaburise, "The Structure of Legal Education in South Africa" 51 : 363-,

      33 H. R. Hahlo, "The South African Legal System and its Background" JUTA 1973

      34 F. P. Walton, "The Scope and Interpretation of the Civil Code" Wilson & Lafleur Ltée 1980

      35 Coing, H., "The Roman Law as Ius Commune on the Continent" 89 : 505-, 1973

      36 Stephen Goldstein, "The Odd Couple: Common Law Procedure And Civilian Substantive Law" 78 : 291-,

      37 Philip F. Iya, "The Legal System and Legal Education in Southern Africa: Past Influences and Current Challenges" 51 : 355-,

      38 CJR John Dugard, "The Judicial Process, Positivism and Civil Liberty" 181-, 1971

      39 Esin Örücü, "The Judge And Jurist In Scotland: On The Verge Of A Second Renaissance" 78 : 89-,

      40 François du Bois, "The Influence of Foreign Law in South Africa" 13 : 593-,

      41 Kenneth G. C. Reid, "The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems" 78 : 5-,

      42 South African Law Commission, "The Harmonisation of The Common Law and The Indigenous Law"

      43 South African Law Commission, "The Harmonisation of The Common Law and The Indigenous Law"

      44 South African Law Commission, "The Harmonisation of The Common Law and The Indigenous Law"

      45 J. W. Wessels, "The Future of Roman-Dutch Law in South Africa" 37 : 265-, 1920

      46 J. TH. DE Smidt, "The Expansion of Dutch private law outside Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, in The World of Hugo Grotius" Holland University Press 1984

      47 C. Graham Botha, "The Early Influence of the English Law upon the Roman-Dutch Law in South Africa,40 S" 396 : 1923

      48 Joel Vander Kooi, "The ASEAN Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechnism: Doing It The “ASEAN WAY”" 20 : 1-,

      49 Lynn Berat, "St. Louis U. L.J" 37 : 849-,

      50 Reinhard Zimmermann, "Southern Cross: Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa" Oxford University Press 1997

      51 Vivienne Goldberg, "South Africa: Private Law In Transition/The Effect of The New Constitution" 33 : 495-,

      52 Frank Berman, "South Africa: A Study of Apartheid Law and Its Enforcement, 2 Touro J. Transnat’l L. 1. H. Patric Glenn, Mixing It Up" 78 : 79-,

      53 Rita M. Byrnes, "South Africa: A Country Study" GPO 1996

      54 Jennifer C. Lukoff, "South Africa takes the initial step towards a brilliant twenty-first century: A comparative study of State v. Kampher & Bowers v. Hardwick" 18 : 459-,

      55 Randal S. Jeffery, "Social and Economics Rights in the South African Constitution: Legal Consequences and Practical Considerations" 27 : 1-54,

      56 James Williams, "Roman-Dutch Law" 19 : 156-, 1910

      57 Reinhard Zimmermann, "Roman-Dutch Jurisprudence and Its contribution to European Private Law" 66 : 1685

      58 Peter Stein, "Roman Law in European History" Cambridge University Press 1999

      59 Andrew Borkowski, "Roman Law" Oxford University Press 2005

      60 "Reinhard Zimmermann"

      61 Robin Evans-Jones, "Receptions of Law, Mixed Legal Systems and the Myth of the Genius of Scots Private Law" 114 : 228-, 1998

      62 Ralf Michaels, "Private Law Beyond The State? Europeanization, Globalization, Privatization" 54 : 843-,

      63 Mathias Reimann, "Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law" Oxford University Press 2006

      64 J. W. Wessels, "Notes on the History and Development of the Roman-Dutch Law" 20 : 23-, 1903

      65 Esin Örücü, "Mixed and Mixing Systems: A Conceptual Search, in Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing" Kluwer Law International 335-, 1996

      66 Vernon Valentine Palmer, "Mixed Legal Systems … And The Myth Of Pure Laws" 67 : 1205-,

      67 Reinhard Zimmermann, "Mixed Legal Systems in Comparative Perspective: Property and Obligations in Scotland and South Africa" Oxford University Press 2004

      68 Jan Smits, "Mixed Jurisdictions: Lessons for European Harmonisation?" 12 (12): 2008

      69 William Tetley, "Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law vs. Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified)" 60 : 677-,

      70 R. W. Lee, "Law and Legislation in the Union of South Africa" 32 : 224-, 1923

      71 Celia Wasserstein Fassberg, "Language And Style In A Mixed Syste" 78 : 151-,

      72 Hundu and Kotu-Rammopo, "Justice in a South African Township"

      73 J. Griffiths, "Journal of Legal Pluralism" 1 :

      74 Vernon Valentine Palmer, "Introduction to the Mixed Jurisdictions, in Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family" Cambridge University Press 2001

      75 JC Bekker, "Introduction to Legal Pluralism in South Africa (2d ed)" LexisNexis Butterworths 2006

      76 Konard Zweigert, "Introduction to Comparative Law" Oxford 1998

      77 C.G van der Merwe, "Interpenetration of Common Law and Civil Law as Experienced in the SouthAfrica and Scottish Law of Property" 78 : 257-,

      78 Colin B. Picker, "International Law’s Mixed Heritage: A Common/Civil Law Jurisdiction" 41 : 1083-,

      79 J. W. Wessels, "History of the Roman-Dutch Law" African Book Company 1908

      80 Deon Hurter Van Zyl, "Geskiedenis van die Romeins-Hollandse Reg" Butterworth 1979

      81 Daisy M. Jenkins, "From Apartheid to Majority Rule: A Glimpse into South Africa’s Journey towards Democracy" 13 : 463-,

      82 "Erasmus"

      83 Daniel Visser, "Cultural Forces In The Making Of Mixed Legal Systems" 78 : 41-,

      84 Burman and Schärf, "Creating people’s justice: street committees and people’s courts in a South African city"

      85 David V. Snyder, "Contract Regulation, With And Wthout The State: Ruminations Of Rules And Their Sources. A comment on Jürgen Basedow" 56 : 723-,

      86 Jacques Du Plessis, "Comparative Law and The Study Of Mixed Legal Systems, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law" Oxford University Press 2006

      87 Ewould Hondius, M. J, "Chorus, and Piet-Hein Gerver, Introduction to Dutch Law (4th revised ed.)" KLUWER LAW 2006

      88 Charles Manga Fombad, "Botswana and Dynamics of Legal Modernisation within a Dual English Common Law/Roman -Dutch Law Legal Heritage" 13 (13): 7-24, 2005

      89 Xavier Blanc-Jouvan, "Book Reviews the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law" 56 : 1080-,

      90 Melius Devilliers, "Berthold of Henneberg, Archbishop of Mainz in 1493, and the Introduction of Roman-Dutch Law in South Africa" 49 : 16-, 1932

      91 Duard Kleyn, "Beginner’s Guide for Law Students (3d ed.)" JUTA 2002

      92 Lourens Du Plessis, "An Introduction to law 3rd edition" JUTA 1999

      93 R. W. Lee, "An Introduction To Roman-Dutch Law" Oxford 1915

      94 Kelly J M, "A Short History of Western Legal Theory" Oxford University Press 1992

      95 Jan Smits, "A European Private Law as a Mixed Legal System: Towards a Ius Commune through the Free Movement of Legal Rules" 5 : 1998

      96 Donald L. Horowitz, "A Democratic South Africa, Constitutional Engineering In A Divided Society" University of California Press 1991

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-06-18 학회명변경 한글명 : 전남대학교 법학연구소 -> 법학연구소 KCI등재후보
      2009-06-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 법률행정연구소 -> 전남대학교 법학연구소
      영문명 : Research Institute of Law & Public Administration -> Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University
      KCI등재후보
      2009-04-02 학회명변경 한글명 : 전남대학교 법학연구소 -> 법학연구소 KCI등재후보
      2009-03-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 법률행정연구소 -> 전남대학교 법학연구소
      영문명 : Research Institute of Law & Public Administration -> Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University
      KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.75 0.805 0.3
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼