特許權 存續期間 延長制度에 관한 硏究 = (A) study on the system of patent term extension

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Patent term can be extended only if it has not been able to be worked for the certain duration due to Patent term extension (hereinafter 'PTE') is restraints of significant for the patentee as well as the 3rd party who wants to work the patented invention.
However law of PTE has been amended many times and relevant rearch regarding PTE administrative plan has not been done sufficiently since the introduction in 1987.
The purpose of this study is not only the presentation of PTE impact on the medical and agricultural chemical industries but also the proposal of protecting said industries as the bio-technology develops in these days.
It is necessary, as a first step, to get the information about PTE such as purport, the background of introduction, origin, processes of application and examination. Then the PTE legislation backgrounds of U.S.A., Europe and Japan are examined with precedents to know how other countries manage PTE system. In the next step, the investigation is done for the Korean PTE system such as the status of examination handling, the precedent of judgement and the regulations related with the background of introduction, infringement of patent right, the constraint of validity, experimental use, etc.
In the following section, Korean PTE is considered in the aspect of impact on the medical and agricultural chemical industries, international harmony and influence on the barrier of international trade, proposing the prospect of related industries and protecting plan.
Finally, this study elucidates that it is of necessity to aid the industrial development balancing between public and private interest without the restrictions of protecting patentee's right in explaining article 96 of the Patent Act for the test helping the advancement of technology.
It is problematic to introduce the regulation that the clinical examination of late medicine manufacturer is not committed into the infringement of patent right during the patent term, since it is controversial in America. Therefore it has to be carefully considered owing to the possibility of conflict with TRIPs.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 제1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 제2節 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 = 3
• 第2章 特許權 存續期間 延長制度의 內容 및 節次 = 5
• 第1節 槪說 = 5
• Ⅰ. 特許權 存續期間 延長制度의 意義 = 5
• Ⅱ. 特許權 存續期間 延長制度의 導入背景 및 起源 = 7
• 第2節 特許權 存續期間 延長登錄 出願 = 9
• Ⅰ. 出願 節次 = 9
• Ⅱ. 延長登錄 出願書 및 記載 要領 = 13
• 第3節 特許權 存續期間 延長登錄 出願의 審査 = 16
• Ⅰ. 方式 審査 = 16
• Ⅱ. 實體 審査 = 17
• Ⅲ. 延長登錄 與否 決定 및 公報에의 揭載 = 25
• 第3章 各國의 立法例 및 判例 = 28
• 第1節 槪說 = 28
• 第2節 主要國家의 立法例 및 判例 = 29
• Ⅰ. 美國 = 29
• Ⅱ. 유럽 = 37
• Ⅲ. 日本 = 59
• Ⅳ. 우리나라 = 64
• 第4章 國內 關聯 産業에 대한 影響 및 保護方案 = 75
• 第1節 特許權 存續期間 延長制度의 影響 = 75
• Ⅰ. 醫藥·農藥産業에 미치는 影響 = 75
• Ⅱ. 貿易障壁에 미치는 影響 = 81
• Ⅲ. 國際的 調和 = 83
• 第2節. 醫藥 및 農藥産業의 保護方案 = 85
• Ⅰ. 醫藥産業의 現況 및 向後 展望 = 85
• Ⅱ. 醫藥 産業의 現況 및 向後 展望 = 87
• Ⅲ. 保護方案 檢討 = 89
• 第5章 結論 = 103
• 參考文獻 = 107
• ABSTRACT - 110