친환경 요소 중 공공의 사회적 책임감이 사회경제 가치관에 미치는 영향

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The design, construction, use and demolition of building generate substantial social and economic benefits to society but may also have serious negative impacts especially for the environment. In response to the demand for evaluation and management of buildings’ environmental performance, several tools and methodologies have been developed and are being implemented in the construction sector aiming at sustainable performance. The research work is focusing on environmental management tools emphasizing to rating systems’ analysis, comparison and implementation for buildings’ environmental performance. The LEED, SBT07, CASBEE and KGBC guides for existing buildings and new construction are compared, similarities and differences are analysed and a joint evaluation guide for existing buildings derived as a result of the rating systems’ analysis. Finally all the components for certification are researched by citizens in Korea and analyzed their sustainable preference and impacts of social responsibility on social economy. The results gained by this research suggested an appropriate way to make a more effective certifying plan and weighting factors according to analyze various citizens’ preference of certain certification sectors.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 지속가능한 개발과 사회적 책임감에 대한 기존 연구
• 3. 연구 방법 및 절차
• 4. 연구 결과
• 5. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hilary I, 135 (135):

2 임정아, "공동주택 관리영역 구분에 의한 친환경 성능평가 도구의 가중치 비교 분석" 대한건축학회 25 (25): 61-71, 2009

3 Jensen, Michael, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure, In The Economic Nature of the Firm" Cambridge University Press 1986

4 Meadows.D.H., "The limits to growth : a report for The club of Rome's Project on the predicament of mankind" Earth Island Limited 1972

5 Paul Shrivastava., "The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability" 2 (2): 936-960, 1995

6 Carroll, Archie., "The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders" 39-48, 1991

7 OECD., "The OECD Guideline & Other Corporate Responsibility Instruments : A Comparison" OECD 2001

8 Galliano, Renato., "Social Economy, Entrepreneurship and Local Development". European Association of Development Agencies" 7-8, 2003

9 OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), "OECD Observer" OECD 2003

10 OECD., "Foreign Direct Investment. Development and Corporate Responsibility" 2000

11 Douglas, A., "Corporate social reporting in Irish financial institutions" 16 (16): 387-395, 2004

12 WBCSD, "Corporate Social Responsibility"

13 Wood, D., "Corporate Social Performance Revisited" 16 (16): 691-718, 1991

14 OECD., "Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public Goals" 2001

15 Nader, Ralph, "Corporate Power in America" Grossman 1973

16 Friedman, Milton., "Capitalism and Freedom" The University of Chicago Press 133-, 1962

17 McGuire, J. W., "Business and Society" Mc Graw-Hill 1963

18 Carroll, A. B., "A three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance"

19 Ralws, John, "A Theory of Justice" Havard University Press 4-, 1971

20 OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, "A Key Corporate Responsibility Instrument. OECD Observer" OECD 1-2,

21 McKeown,R., "2002 Education for sustainable Debelopment Toolkit(version2)"