김춘수의 실존과 양심 = The existence and the conscience in Kim Chun Su's literary works

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Kim Chun Su's poetic activity was characterized by tenacious quest for sense as well as his throughout quest for nonsense. If poetry and salvation was connected, the problem of salvation couldn't be resolved only with the pursuit of poetic nonsense. At this point, the thing that he paid attention was 'conscience'. His experience which submitted in violence forced to him tormented by guilt. Until solving the problem of conscience, he thought that he was away from salvation. As a result, during term of his poetic activity, he devoted to solve this problem. In the process, Russian philosopher N. Berdyaev's ideas provided him with big inspiration. From Berdyaev's idea of human being's judgment on history, he found clues for solving problem. And he discovered the people they would be able to prove this, Socrates, Vera Figner, etc. Through these cases, he found that human conscience alive, and he got relief. However, these cases were just a superman. Therefore, in order to complete resolution of this problem of salvation required another poetic solution.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며 : 무의미와 허무, 그 근원적인 문제점
• Ⅱ. 양심의 소재를 찾아서
• Ⅲ. 양심의 재해석, 그 근거와 의미
• Ⅳ. 나오며 : 동일시에 따른 문제점
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 니콜라이 베르댜예프, "현대 세계의 인간 운명" 지만지 2008

2 김춘수, "하느님의 아들 사람의 아들" 현대문학사 1985

3 김춘수, "의미와 무의미" 문학과지성사 1976

4 김춘수, "왜 나는 시인인가" 현대문학 2005

5 니콜라스 베르쟈예프, "문명의 실패와 인간의 운명" 현암사 1984

6 베라 피그넬, "러시아의 밤" 형성사 1985

7 김춘수, "꽃과 여우" 민음사 1997

8 최라영, "김춘수의 무의미시 연구" 서울대 2004

9 김춘수, "김춘수 시전집" 현대문학 2008