압수·수색영장 집행단계에서의 문제점 검토 = Examination of the problem at the stage of Enforcing Search and Seizure Warran

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The principle of due process, one of the guiding ideas of criminal prosecution is intended to guarantee the human rights of the accused that may be violated in the process of finding substantial facts by the national agency such as investigative agency. This principle is applicable to the process of search and seizure closely related to the legal disposition of the object, especially the procurement of evidence.
The evidence collected without obeying the procedures stipulated in the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Law can not be used as evidence for guilt in principle as it does not observe the due process of law stipulated to guarantee basic human rights. Accordingly, the investigative agency should pursue the harmony between the due process of law and the protection of the human rights for the accused at the stage of enforcing search and seizure warrant. Excessive emphasis on the finding of substantial truth may increase the case of the infringement of human rights. The seized property obtained due to such procedural illegality is denied in the ability of its evidence according to the exclusionary rule. Therefore, this study was intended to present its improvements, For this purpose, it attempted to examine such problems as the duty of prior presentation of the warrant by the investigative agency at the stage of enforcing search and seizure warrant, the scope of noticing the content of the warrant, the problem of participation by resident, the evidence related to other crimes found in the process of legal search and seizure, the problem of procedural delay and the like.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ . 서론
• Ⅱ . 위법수집증거배제법칙
• Ⅲ . 압수·수색영장 집행단계에서의 문제점
• Ⅳ . 문제점 해결을 위한 방안

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임동규, "형사소송법(제5판)" 법문사 2008

2 노명선, "형사소송법" 성균관대학교 출판부 2009

3 손동권, "형사소송법" 세창출판사 2010

4 노정환, "현행 압수수색제도에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 실무상 문제점을 중심으로 -" 법조협회 59 (59): 5-57, 2010

5 노정환, "현행 압수ㆍ수색제도의 문제점에 대한 고찰, 법률신문 제3709호, 2008. 12. 29."

6 이영란, "한국형사소송법" 나남 2008

7 "중국형사법" 법무부 2008

8 오영근, "위법수집증거배제법칙에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 1995

9 조국, "위법수집증거배제법칙" 박영사 2005

10 민영성, "영장주의의 예외인정과 명인법리" 40 (40): 1999

11 민영성, "압수ㆍ수색영장의 집행" 고시연구 2005

12 김경수, "수사절차상 압수ㆍ수색의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 대학원 2010

13 김기준, "수사단계의 압수ㆍ수색 절차 규정에 대한 몇 가지 고찰" 대검찰청 2009

14 김기준, "독립적 긴급압수ㆍ수색제도의 도입 필요성에 대한 고찰" 2008

15 "각국의 압수ㆍ수색제도와 실무" 대검찰청 2007

16 Kevin A Lantz, "search and seizure: “the princess and the 'rock'”minnesota declinesto extend “plain view” to “plain feel”- state v.dickerson, 481 N.W.2d 840(minn), cert granted, 113 s.c.t 53(interim ed. 1992)" University of Dayton Law Review 1993

17 Evan B. Citron, "say hello and wave goodbye: the legitimacy of plain view seizures at the threshold of the home" Fordham Law Review 2006

18 Ronaldo v. Del. Carmen, "CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3rd Edition" 길안사 1999