RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      간재 전우의 이단 비판의 기준과 근거 = Bases and Criteria of Ganjae Jeon Woo`s Criticism about Heterodoxies

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99864610

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, we want to present the solid viewpoint of Ganjae Jeon Woo (1841~1922) on the criteria for distinguishing the orthodox studies(正學) from the heretical ones(異學), the study of the Saints(聖學) from the heterodoxies(異端), and on the bases for criticizing heretical studies. The criteria for distinguishing orthodox studies and study of the Saints from the heterodoxies are as followed. First, the study of the Saints is the one according to which the mind(心) considers the Heaven(天) the foundation, if the mind is considered the foundation, then this study is heretical. Second, the study which understands the Heaven`s principle(天理) as the master and the mind as the assistant, enhancing the nature(性) and regarding the principle(理) as the criterion can be called the orthodox study; while the study which thinks the mind as the holy king(聖君), lowering the nature, making the mind control the nature, and considering the mind the extreme rule is heretical. Third, the study which follows and believes in the mind is heretical, the study which follows and believes in the human nature is orthodox. Fourth, the study which considers the principle and nature the masters is orthodox, while the study which considers the energy flow(氣) and mind the masters is heretical. Fifth, the study in which the mind enhances the nature is the study of the Saints, while the study in which the mind enhances itself and makes light of the nature is heterodox. Ganjae puts forth various reference points but the last conclusion is that in his viewpoint, only study of Zhu Xi can be regarded as orthodox, and any other theories are heterodox. Only the core proposition of the study of Zhu Xi according to which ``the nature is the principle, the mind is the energy flow(性卽理·心卽氣)`` is right, while the argument that ``the mind is the principle(心卽理)`` is wrong. Only the study which regards the Heaven-the principle-the nature(天·理·性) - means the static metaphysical substances - as foundations and enhances them can be called the true study of the Saint and the orthodoxy; on the contrary, the study which regards the mind - the energy flow - as the foundation and enhances it is called heterodoxy. The study about which Jeon Woo thinks as the most desirable and correct is the one according to which the nature is considered the highest criterion and the mind the lower, the mind must imitate and respect the nature as a disciple does to his master(性師心弟).
      번역하기

      In this paper, we want to present the solid viewpoint of Ganjae Jeon Woo (1841~1922) on the criteria for distinguishing the orthodox studies(正學) from the heretical ones(異學), the study of the Saints(聖學) from the heterodoxies(異端), and on...

      In this paper, we want to present the solid viewpoint of Ganjae Jeon Woo (1841~1922) on the criteria for distinguishing the orthodox studies(正學) from the heretical ones(異學), the study of the Saints(聖學) from the heterodoxies(異端), and on the bases for criticizing heretical studies. The criteria for distinguishing orthodox studies and study of the Saints from the heterodoxies are as followed. First, the study of the Saints is the one according to which the mind(心) considers the Heaven(天) the foundation, if the mind is considered the foundation, then this study is heretical. Second, the study which understands the Heaven`s principle(天理) as the master and the mind as the assistant, enhancing the nature(性) and regarding the principle(理) as the criterion can be called the orthodox study; while the study which thinks the mind as the holy king(聖君), lowering the nature, making the mind control the nature, and considering the mind the extreme rule is heretical. Third, the study which follows and believes in the mind is heretical, the study which follows and believes in the human nature is orthodox. Fourth, the study which considers the principle and nature the masters is orthodox, while the study which considers the energy flow(氣) and mind the masters is heretical. Fifth, the study in which the mind enhances the nature is the study of the Saints, while the study in which the mind enhances itself and makes light of the nature is heterodox. Ganjae puts forth various reference points but the last conclusion is that in his viewpoint, only study of Zhu Xi can be regarded as orthodox, and any other theories are heterodox. Only the core proposition of the study of Zhu Xi according to which ``the nature is the principle, the mind is the energy flow(性卽理·心卽氣)`` is right, while the argument that ``the mind is the principle(心卽理)`` is wrong. Only the study which regards the Heaven-the principle-the nature(天·理·性) - means the static metaphysical substances - as foundations and enhances them can be called the true study of the Saint and the orthodoxy; on the contrary, the study which regards the mind - the energy flow - as the foundation and enhances it is called heterodoxy. The study about which Jeon Woo thinks as the most desirable and correct is the one according to which the nature is considered the highest criterion and the mind the lower, the mind must imitate and respect the nature as a disciple does to his master(性師心弟).

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍원식, "한주 이진상의 생애와 사상" 예문서원 2008

      2 최영성, "한국유학통사(하)" 심산 2006

      3 김세정, "왕양명의 생명철학" 청계 2006

      4 김세정, "양명 심학과 퇴계 심학의 비교 연구 -양명의 주자학 비판과 퇴계의 양명학 비판을 중심으로-" 한국동서철학회 (43) : 289-326, 2007

      5 "陸九淵集"

      6 琴章泰, "退溪門下의 陽明學 이해와 비판" 한국양명학회 (2) : 1998

      7 "華西集" 민족문화추진회 2003

      8 "艮齋集" 민족문화추진회 2004

      9 간재학회, "艮齋學論叢 1집~14집" 艮齋學會

      10 이상익, "畿湖性理學論考" 심산 2005

      1 홍원식, "한주 이진상의 생애와 사상" 예문서원 2008

      2 최영성, "한국유학통사(하)" 심산 2006

      3 김세정, "왕양명의 생명철학" 청계 2006

      4 김세정, "양명 심학과 퇴계 심학의 비교 연구 -양명의 주자학 비판과 퇴계의 양명학 비판을 중심으로-" 한국동서철학회 (43) : 289-326, 2007

      5 "陸九淵集"

      6 琴章泰, "退溪門下의 陽明學 이해와 비판" 한국양명학회 (2) : 1998

      7 "華西集" 민족문화추진회 2003

      8 "艮齋集" 민족문화추진회 2004

      9 간재학회, "艮齋學論叢 1집~14집" 艮齋學會

      10 이상익, "畿湖性理學論考" 심산 2005

      11 "王陽明全集"

      12 "寒洲集" 민족문화추진회 2003

      13 "傳習錄"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2016-02-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Confucianism KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.62 0.62 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.49 1.162 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼