「두예서(杜預序)」를 근거로 한 ‘『춘추』필법(筆法)’에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Guiding Principles Of Confucius in Writing the Annals Based on Introduction to Du Yu

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Confucius recorded Chunqiu (春秋) directly to prevent the standards of right and wrong from going wrong in the future generations. But if we don't know ‘the guiding principles of Confucius in writing the Annals’, it's not easy for us to grasp the implications of the book Chunqiu. Today, due to the lack of research in ‘the guiding principles of Confucius in writing the Annals’, many errors are often made in our studies. There are ‘Mi Yi Hyeon (微而顯)’, ‘Ji Yi Hoi (志而晦)’, ‘Wan Yi Seong Jang (婉而成章)’, ‘Jin Yi Bul Woo (盡而不汚)’, and ‘Jing Ak Yi Gweon Seon (徵惡而勸善)’ in the list of ‘the guiding principles of Confucius in writing the Annals’ which is mentioned by ‘Du Yu’.
The five things which Du Yu says are called ‘the guiding principles of Confucius in writing the Annals’, Of the five types of ‘the guiding principle of Confucius in writing the Annals’, ‘Mi Yi Hyeon’ is to reveal a cause in a feeble expression, ‘Ji Yi Hoi’ is to describe in omitting records, ‘Wan Yi Seong Jang’ is to describe in a roundabout way, ‘Jin Yi Bul Woo’ is to write all but not to distort, and ‘Jing Ak Yi Gweon Seon’ is to make it appear the cause of the name by revealing good and evil more.
This paper first considered Confucius’s ‘the guiding principles of Confucius in writing the Annals’ through the method of finding the examples which is mentioned in The Introduction Of ‘Du Yu’. Though we may not be able to grasp the meaning in other four out of five Confucian ways of criticism, we just don't grasp the mass of the meaning properly and might not interpret it in a completely different sense. However, because ‘Wan Yi Seong Jang’ among the five Confucian ways of criticism is expressed by a euphemism, it can lead to errors when we interpret writing literally. And because ‘Wan Yi Seong Jang’ contains the risk that we can grasp writing in the opposite sense, this paper focused on ‘Wan Yi Seong Jang‘
I believe that the study like being mentioned above transcended interpreting writing in terms of grammar and took the expected effect to be a help to try to grasp the meaning of the sentence exactly.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "論語"

2 박인호, "한주 이진상의 춘추학- 『춘추집전』과 『춘추익전』을 중심으로 -" 한국학연구원 (60) : 81-113, 2015

3 오석원, "한국 도학파의 의리사상" 유교문화연구소 2005

4 이춘식, "춘추전국시대 법치사상과 세`술" 아카넷 2002

5 정태현, "역주춘추좌씨전" 전통문화연구회 2002

6 김문준, "송시열의 춘추사상과 정몽주 추숭의 의의" 포은학회 17 : 33-63, 2016

7 김경진, "민족"融合"과"和合"의 철학적 원리" 철학연구회 60 : 1997

8 유교문화연구소, "대학․중용" 성균관대학교출판부 2007

9 이기동, "논어강설" 성균관대학교출판부 2015

10 유일석, "논어" 새희망 2015

11 최종례, "고사성어로 읽는 춘추좌전" 玄音社

12 강병창, "경제학자가 본 알기 쉬운 논어" 명문당 2002

13 段玉裁, "說文解字"

14 "詩經"

15 김동민, "胡安國의 『春秋』 해석을 통해 본 宋代 春秋學의 특징" 한국동양철학회 (43) : 53-85, 2015

16 金東敏, "漢代 春秋公羊學의 성립과 전개에 관한 연구" 성균관대 2006

17 박성진, "杜預의 春秋經傳集解에 나타난 春秋筆法과 襃貶의 원칙 분석: 左傳의 <凡例>ㆍ<變例>를 중심으로" 인문학연구소 (29) : 5-36, 2011

18 "杜預序"

19 김동민, "李震相 『春秋集傳』의 性理學的 『春秋』 이해" 대동문화연구원 (103) : 143-176, 2018

20 權正顔, "春秋의 根本理念과 批判精神에 관한 연구" 成均館大學校 大學院 1990

21 안춘분, "春秋의 ‘大義滅親’에 대한 孔子의 大義親親的 입장" 한국유교학회 (41) : 89-118, 2010

22 "春秋詳節句解"

23 "春秋胡氏傳"

24 "春秋穀梁傳"

25 龔留, "春秋弦歌-《左傳》與中國文化" 河南大學出版社 2005

26 "春秋左氏傳" 보경문화사 2006

27 楊伯峻, "春秋左傳注" 中華書局 1983

28 "春秋左傳正義"

29 "春秋左傳"

30 "春秋公羊傳"

31 "春秋"

32 "孟子"

33 유교문화연구소, "孟子" 성균관대학교출판부 2006

34 안춘분, "孔子의 『春秋』大義思想硏究" 성균관대 2015

35 "周易"

36 안춘분, "先秦儒家에 있어서 義思想의 本質과 實踐에 觀한 硏究" 한국유교학회 (37) : 211-246, 2009

37 안춘분, "『春秋』로 본 諸侯 齊桓公과 晉文公의 正名論" 한국유교학회 (42) : 107-145, 2010

38 안춘분, "<春秋>의 다양한 批判見解를 통해 본 춘추시대정신" 동양철학연구회 (65) : 185-220, 2011

39 서정기, "(새 시대를 위한)春秋" 살림터 1997