RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디지털무역과 경쟁규범의 쟁점과 함의 = Implications of Competition Issues in Digital Trade

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109524063

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examined the competition-related issues raised in digital trade from both formal and substantive perspectives. From a formal perspective, the study first reviewed how digital trade laws are defined in traditional trade agreements such as the Korea-US FTA and Korea-EU FTA. Then, it analyzed the characteristics of competition laws in the digital sector found in the recently concluded RCEP. In the second formal aspect, the study examined the formal characteristics of competition laws in digital agreements specifically designed to regulate digital trade and the competition laws included in digital agreements such as KSDPA and DEPA, which Korea has signed. Through this, the study found that the competition laws in international agreements tend to emphasize cooperation between countries, rather than directly defining the rights and obligations of states.
      From a substantive perspective, the study first analyzed the issues surrounding competition laws embedded in various digital agreements. It confirmed that the competition laws included in trade or digital agreements at this stage would likely raise various legal issues in their enforcement. To resolve these, the study considered solutions such as enhancing and refining existing agreements, establishing new international competition laws, and addressing issues related to the extraterritorial application of domestic laws. However, the most realistic alternative for resolving these issues is to find common ground in the current practices of states, reflect this in the individual agreements they sign, and create a network of internationally recognized competition laws through this process.
      Finally, the current discussions surrounding competition laws in digital trade largely focus on regulating online(or digital) platforms. This indicates that the subject of discussions around digital trade laws is shifting from market liberalization and the removal of trade barriers to more evolved digital trade laws that include online platform issues, reflecting a change in their ‘purpose’ and ‘scope’. Therefore, to understand more advanced platform regulations, it is essential to understand the multifaceted relationship between online platforms in digital trade and competition policy as an international trade law.
      번역하기

      This study examined the competition-related issues raised in digital trade from both formal and substantive perspectives. From a formal perspective, the study first reviewed how digital trade laws are defined in traditional trade agreements such as th...

      This study examined the competition-related issues raised in digital trade from both formal and substantive perspectives. From a formal perspective, the study first reviewed how digital trade laws are defined in traditional trade agreements such as the Korea-US FTA and Korea-EU FTA. Then, it analyzed the characteristics of competition laws in the digital sector found in the recently concluded RCEP. In the second formal aspect, the study examined the formal characteristics of competition laws in digital agreements specifically designed to regulate digital trade and the competition laws included in digital agreements such as KSDPA and DEPA, which Korea has signed. Through this, the study found that the competition laws in international agreements tend to emphasize cooperation between countries, rather than directly defining the rights and obligations of states.
      From a substantive perspective, the study first analyzed the issues surrounding competition laws embedded in various digital agreements. It confirmed that the competition laws included in trade or digital agreements at this stage would likely raise various legal issues in their enforcement. To resolve these, the study considered solutions such as enhancing and refining existing agreements, establishing new international competition laws, and addressing issues related to the extraterritorial application of domestic laws. However, the most realistic alternative for resolving these issues is to find common ground in the current practices of states, reflect this in the individual agreements they sign, and create a network of internationally recognized competition laws through this process.
      Finally, the current discussions surrounding competition laws in digital trade largely focus on regulating online(or digital) platforms. This indicates that the subject of discussions around digital trade laws is shifting from market liberalization and the removal of trade barriers to more evolved digital trade laws that include online platform issues, reflecting a change in their ‘purpose’ and ‘scope’. Therefore, to understand more advanced platform regulations, it is essential to understand the multifaceted relationship between online platforms in digital trade and competition policy as an international trade law.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼