RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      부동산감정평가에 있어서의 피드백 영향 = A Study on Feedback in Real Estate Appraisal

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106020808

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES This study aims to evaluate how much an appraiser is psychologically and behaviorally influenced by another appraiser in the process of an appraisal. A quasi-experimental design was employed in this study. First, we...

      1. CONTENTS
      (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
      This study aims to evaluate how much an appraiser is psychologically and behaviorally influenced by another appraiser in the process of an appraisal. A quasi-experimental design was employed in this study. First, we presented data on two commercial real estate properties in Seoul and requested appraisal from 120 appraisers to measure the behavioral and psychological variation. After one month we requested re-appraisal for the same real estate. We asked the appraisers to rate weather they thought their appraisal for the two properties was low, high, average relative to the other appraisers. And divided the appraisers into 3 groups classifying low(or high) valuation feedback group the feedback which was 30% lower(or higher) than primary appraisal expected average price, and also did not present any feedback to non valuation feedback group but requested re-appraisal.
      (2) RESEARCH METHOD
      quasi-experimental design
      (3) RESEARCH RESULTS
      As a result of the re-appraisal, 18.8% of the 80 appraisers who rather then appraisers as high or low adjusted their appraisal. We analyzed if the appraisers had been influenced psychologically and behaviorally. There were no changes in factors influencing the real estate price. So, it can be estimated that the appraisers were influenced psychologically and behaviorally, not by other environmental effects. It was also revealed that there were no statistical differences between before and after modification. Therefore, the appraisers who modified their original prices were influenced by the price that the other appraisers made, but the price difference was very negligible. An interesting the point is that appraises who modifies their appraisal were generally younger and had been in their career a shorter time than those who did not modify their appraisers.
      2. RESULTS
      It is estimated that appraisers can be given a certain amount of feedback about the market transaction price and the appraisal price of other appraisers in the process of an appraisal. However, the result of the quasi-experimental design show that the appraisers were seldom influenced psychologically or behaviorally by the price appraised by the other appraisers: we can conclude that most appraisers have confidence in their appraisal price.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김영진, "신부동산평가론" 1981.

      2 홍길성, "신부동산감정평가원론" 1991.

      3 방경식, "부동산학개론" 1998.

      4 안정근, "부동산평가이론" 법문사 2000.

      5 서동기, "감정평가이론예해" 부연사 2000.

      6 Balzer, "Which Components of Cognitive Feedback Affect Performance?" 1992.

      7 Ratcliff, "Valuation for Real Estate Decisions" Democrat Press 1972.

      8 Wofford, "Thinking about Real Estate University of Oklahoma" 1995.

      9 Black Roy T, "The Use of Information Versus Asking Price in the Real Property Negotiation Process" 1995.

      10 "The Appraisal of Real Estate" 1996.

      1 김영진, "신부동산평가론" 1981.

      2 홍길성, "신부동산감정평가원론" 1991.

      3 방경식, "부동산학개론" 1998.

      4 안정근, "부동산평가이론" 법문사 2000.

      5 서동기, "감정평가이론예해" 부연사 2000.

      6 Balzer, "Which Components of Cognitive Feedback Affect Performance?" 1992.

      7 Ratcliff, "Valuation for Real Estate Decisions" Democrat Press 1972.

      8 Wofford, "Thinking about Real Estate University of Oklahoma" 1995.

      9 Black Roy T, "The Use of Information Versus Asking Price in the Real Property Negotiation Process" 1995.

      10 "The Appraisal of Real Estate" 1996.

      11 Diaz, "Processing Tracing Investigation into Problem Solving within Residential Real Estate Appraisal" Georgia State University 1987.

      12 Gallimore, "Paul,Aspects of Information Processing in Valuation Judgement and Choice" 1994.

      13 Shenkel,William M, "Modern Real Estate Appraisal" McGraw-Hil Co. 1978

      14 Diaz, "JulianⅢ and Marvin L. Wolverton,A Longitudinal Examination of the Appraisal Smoothing Hypothesis" 1998.

      15 Diaz, "JulianⅢ and J. Andrew Hansz,How Valuers Use the Value Opinions of Others" 1997.

      16 Diaz, "Journal of Property Valuation and Investment" 1999.

      17 Black, "Journal of Property Valuation and Investment" 1997.

      18 Sterman, "J.D.,Misperceptions of Feedback in Dynamic Decision Making" 1989.

      19 Remus, "Does Feedback Improve the Accuracy of Recurrent Judgmental Forecasts?" 1996.

      20 Levy, "Deborah and Edward Schuck,The Influence of Clients on Valuations" 1999.

      21 Gallimore, "Confirmation Bias in the Valuation Process A Test for Corroborating Evidence Journal of Property Research" 1996.

      22 Wolverton, "Client Feedback and the Role of the Appraiser Journal of Real Estate Research" 1999.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.61 2.61 1.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.49 1.25 0.704 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼