RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      문학교육에서의 평가에 대한 비판적 검토 = A Critical Approach to the Evaluation in Literature Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19692856

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is the purpose of this article to review the current discussion about the assessment and evaluation in teaching literature in secondary education. Teaching Literature(Gu, In-Hwan, et al., Seoul: Samjiwon, 1988) was the first book that discussed this matter seriously and theoretically in Korea, so the part of this book regarding the assessment was analysed closely. It is criticized in that it does not criticize the current education fundamentally that makes students accept only one interpretation and evaluation of a literary work. I criticized that this view is based on the essentialism on the literary value. The writers of the book are mistaken in that they think it depends on qualified teachers to teach literature well. This is why they do not recognize that the education in the capitalist schooling makes people discriminated by assessment. I argued that assessment is contradictory with the ideal of teaching literature. In order to overcome this, we should view the assessment as a socio-cultural and institutional matter, and should establish new viewpoint on the evaluation based upon the dialogue among different evaluations.
      번역하기

      It is the purpose of this article to review the current discussion about the assessment and evaluation in teaching literature in secondary education. Teaching Literature(Gu, In-Hwan, et al., Seoul: Samjiwon, 1988) was the first book that discussed th...

      It is the purpose of this article to review the current discussion about the assessment and evaluation in teaching literature in secondary education. Teaching Literature(Gu, In-Hwan, et al., Seoul: Samjiwon, 1988) was the first book that discussed this matter seriously and theoretically in Korea, so the part of this book regarding the assessment was analysed closely. It is criticized in that it does not criticize the current education fundamentally that makes students accept only one interpretation and evaluation of a literary work. I criticized that this view is based on the essentialism on the literary value. The writers of the book are mistaken in that they think it depends on qualified teachers to teach literature well. This is why they do not recognize that the education in the capitalist schooling makes people discriminated by assessment. I argued that assessment is contradictory with the ideal of teaching literature. In order to overcome this, we should view the assessment as a socio-cultural and institutional matter, and should establish new viewpoint on the evaluation based upon the dialogue among different evaluations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼