정부개혁의 내용과 제도적 조건에 관한 연구: 부울 연산법의 적용 = A Study on the Relationships between Governmental Reforms and Institutional Conditions Using Boolean Algorithms

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구의 목적은 1970년대 후반 이후 실시된 OECD 회원국들의 정부개혁 내용에는 어떤 차이가 있으며, 특정 내용의 정부개혁을 가져오는 제도적 조건을 밝혀내고자 하는 것이다. 이를 위해 12개 OECD 회원국의 정부개혁 내용을 5가지로 분류하고, 국가별 특징과 차이점을 분석하였다. 또 부울 연산법을 이용하여 이들 국가들의 제도적 특성 가운데 어떠한 제도적 조건들이 특정 내용의 정부개혁을 가져오는지를 분석하였다. 분석결과 주로 영미권 국가들은 시장기제 활용을, 유럽 대륙국가들은 권한위임을 통한 정부개혁이 많은 것으로 나타났다. 특히 시장기제 활용을 가져오는 제도적 조건을 분석한 결과, 다수제 내각·공익적 행정문화·정치인과 관료의 분리 또는 단방제·합의제 내각·법치국가적 행정문화·정치인과 관료의 정치 적 관계 가운데 어느 한 조건만 충족하면 되고, 다수제 내각·공익적 행정문화·정치인과 관료의 분리 조합이 시장기제 활용에 더 중요한 조건으로 나타났다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine relationships between governmental reform and institutional conditions. In order to explore this issue, this study is divided two steps. First, . the governmental reforms of 12 OECD member states were categorized into five reform types. Second, this study employed an explicitly Boolean approach to explain the linkages between governmental reform and institutional conditions. Analysis revealed two combinations linked to the outcome (market-type mechanisms): majoritarian executive combined with administrative culture of public interest, and divided relationships between political executive and civil servants; or unitary state combined with consensual executive, administrative culture of Rechtsstaat, and political relationships between political executive and civil servants. In particular, the combination of majoritarian executive, administrative culture of public interest, and divided relationships between political executive and civil servants is more important for the use of market-type mechanisms.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송하중, "현정부의 행정개혁 추진체제 평가" 8 (8): 5-30, 1999

2 최창수, "행정개혁, 절반의 성공: 신제도주의 동형화 관점에서의 사례분석" 서울행정학회 19 (19): 1-23, 2008

3 민진, "한국와 영국의 행정개혁 비교" 32 (32): 37-52, 1998

4 김병섭, "편견과 오류줄이기: 조사연구의 논리와 기법" 법문사 2008

5 성지은, "정책과 제도의 수렴과 발산: 한일 행정개혁 과정을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 47 (47): 215-248, 2004

6 김준기, "정부개혁의 국제적 동조화 현상, In 세계화 시대의 국가정책" 박영사 99-147, 2004

7 박재완, "정부개혁 평가: 비참여자의 시각, In 정부개혁백서" 기획예산처 399-421, 1999

8 임현진, "전지구화, 구조조정 및 민주주의: 한국의 비교경험" 24 (24): 51-78, 2002

9 이윤식, "영국과 호주의 중앙정부 정부개혁에 관한 소고: 역사적 신제도주의적 관점을 중심으로" 한국공공관리학회 22 (22): 385-420, 2008

10 이명석, "신공공관리론, 신거버넌스론, 그리고 김대중 정부의 행정개혁" 한국행정학회 305-321, 2001

11 소순창, "신공공관리(NPM)적 측면에서 본 행정개혁: 한국, 일본, 그리고 영국의 비교분석 *" 한국지방자치학회 16 (16): 319-342, 2004

12 남궁근, "스칸디나비아 국가의 거버넌스와 개혁" 한울 2006

13 정용덕, "세계화시대의 거버넌스, In 세계화 시대의 국가정책" 박영사 87-107, 2004

14 이창길, "세계화 과정에서 정책의 동형화(Isomorphism) 메커니즘 분석: 인력감축, 정보공개 및 민영화 사례를 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 46 (46): 1-26, 2008

15 김지희, "비교정치연구에 있어서 혼합체계 분석안의 방법론적 적실성: 인과추론방식을 중심으로" 35 (35): 265-275, 2001

16 김웅진, "비교사회연구방법론" 한울아카데미 2000

17 Ragin, C., "비교방법론" 대영문화사 1989

18 최종고, "법학통론" 박영사 2006

19 김근세, "ʻ작은정부ʼ 개혁의 수렴과 분산 : 문화와 정치제도 맥락의 비교분석" 한국행정연구원 19 (19): 3-31, 2011

20 UN, "World Public Sector Report: Globalization and the State" 2001

21 OECD, "Working for Results: The American Experience in Enhancing Government Performance" 2002

22 Bennett, C. J., "What is policy convergence and what causes it?" 21 : 215-234, 1991

23 Newman, P., "Urban Planning in Europe; International competition, national systems and planning projects" Routledge 1996

24 Rhodes, R., "Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability" Open Univ. Press 1997

25 Ragin, C., "USER’S GUIDE To Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis"

26 "UN Public Administration Programme 홈페이지"

27 Peters, B. G., "The future of governing: four emerging models" University Press of Kansas 1996

28 Lynn, L., "The New Public Management: How to Transfer a Theme into a Legacy" 58 (58): 231-237, 1998

29 Hood, C., "The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme" 20 (20): 93-109, 1995

30 Rhodes, R., "The New Governance: Governing without government" 44 : 652-667, 1996

31 Dunleavy, P., "The Globalization of Public Services Production: Can Government be ‘Best in the World?'" 9 (9): 36-64, 1994

32 Kettl, D., "The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance" Brookings Institution 2000

33 Micheletti, M., "The End of Big Government: is it Happening in the Nordic Countries?" 13 (13): 265-278, 2000

34 Merryman, J. H., "The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America(2nd ed)" Stanford Univ. Press 1985

35 Savoie, D., "Thatcher, Reagan, Mulroney: In Search of a New Bureaucracy" University of Toronto Press 1994

36 Loughlin, J., "State traditions, administrative reform and regionalization, In The Political Economy of regionalism" Frank Cass 1997

37 Ragin, C., "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage" 14 : 291-310, 2006

38 McGuire, L., "Service Charters - Global Convergence or National Divergence?: A comparison of initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States" 3 (3): 493-524, 2001

39 Kamensky, J., "Role of the ‘reinventing government’ movement in federal management reform" 56 (56): 247-255, 1996

40 Kettl, D., "Reinventing Government? Appraising the National Performance Review" Brookings Institution 1994

41 UN, "Reconstructing Public Administration after Conflict: Challenges, Practices and Lessons Learned"

42 OECD, "Public Sector Modernisation"

43 Lynn, L. E., "Public Management: Old and New" Routledge 2006

44 Pollitt, C., "Public Management Reform: a comparative analysis" Oxford Univ. Press 2004

45 Kickert, W., "Public Governance in the Netherlands: An Alternative to Anglo-American ‘Managerialism’" 75 (75): 731-752, 1997

46 Ingraham, P., "Play It Again, Sam, It’s Still Not Right: Searching for the Right Notes in Administration Reform" Syracuse University 27-29, 1996

47 OECD, "Performance Management in Government" OECD 1996

48 OECD, "Performance Management Program in the Canadian Federal Public Service" 2002

49 OECD, "Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries" OECD 2007

50 UN, "People Matter Civic Engagement in Public Governance"

51 Lijphart, A., "Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thiry-Six Countries" Yale Univ Press 1999

52 Sartori, G., "Parties and party systems" Cambridge University press 1976

53 OECD, "OECD Reviews of Human Resource Management in Government: Belgium" 2007

54 "OECD Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development 홈페이지, In 국가별 보고서"

55 OECD, "OECD Country Profiles" OECD 1997

56 Loughlin, J., "Nation, state and region in Western Europe, In Culture: Building stone for Europe 2002" European Interuniversity Press 1994

57 OECD, "Modernising Government : The Way Forward" OECD 2005

58 OECD, "Models of Public Budgeting and Accounting Reform" 2 (2): 2002

59 OECD, "Managing Across Levels of Government" OECD 1997

60 Pollitt, C., "Managerialism and the Public Services: cuts or cultural change in the 1990s?" Blackwell 1993

61 Pollitt, C., "Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience" Basil Blackwell 1990

62 Wollmann, H., "Local government systems: from historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as comparative cases in point" 18 : 33-55, 2000

63 OECD, "Linking Performance at Organisational and Individual Levels-National Report by France" 2005

64 OECD, "In Search of Results: Performance Management Practices" OECD 1997

65 OECD, "How to Manage Individual Performance-United Kingdom Country Report" 2002

66 OECD, "Government of the Future"

67 Rexed, K., "Governance of Decentralised Pay Setting in Selected OECD Countries" 2007

68 Lynn, L., "Globalization and Administrative Reform: What is Happening in Theory?" Erasmus University 2000

69 Lalenis, K., "Families of Nations and Institutional Transplantation, In GeoJournal Library" Kluwer 2002

70 OECD, "Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making" OECD 2005

71 OECD, "Dedicated Public-Private Partnership Units: A Survey of Institutional and Governance Structures" OECD 2010

72 OECD, "Cutting Red Tape: Administrative Simplification in the Netherlands" 2007

73 Lian, O. S., "Convergence or Divergence? Reforming Primary Care in Norway and Britain" 8 (8): 305-330, 2003

74 Common, R. K., "Convergence and transfer: a review of the globalisation of new public management" 11 (11): 440-450, 1998

75 Rihoux, B., "Configurational Comparative Methods" SAGE Publications 2009

76 Pollitt, C., "Clarifying Convergence: Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform" 3 (3): 471-492, 2001

77 Henderson, K., "Characterizing American public administration-The concept of administrative culture" 17 (17): 234-250, 2004

78 Pierre, J., "Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration" Edward Elgar 1995

79 Mascarenhas, R. C., "Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector: Reform of the Public Sector in Australia, Britain, and New Zealand" 53 (53): 319-328, 1993

80 Jones, L. R., "Assessing Public Management Reform in an International Context" 4 (4): 1-19, 2003

81 Pollitt, C., "Agency Fever? Analysis of an International Policy Fashion" 3 : 271-290, 2001

82 Caiden, G. E., "Administrative reform comes of age" Walter de Gruyter 1991

83 Anechiarico, F., "Administrative Culture and Civil Society: A Comparative Perspective" 30 (30): 13-34, 1998

84 Hood, C., "A Public Management for All Seasons?" 69 (69): 3-19, 1991