RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    정부개혁의 내용과 제도적 조건에 관한 연구: 부울 연산법의 적용 = A Study on the Relationships between Governmental Reforms and Institutional Conditions Using Boolean Algorithms

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101974780

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to examine relationships between governmental reform and institutional conditions. In order to explore this issue, this study is divided two steps. First, . the governmental reforms of 12 OECD member states were categorized into five reform types. Second, this study employed an explicitly Boolean approach to explain the linkages between governmental reform and institutional conditions. Analysis revealed two combinations linked to the outcome (market-type mechanisms): majoritarian executive combined with administrative culture of public interest, and divided relationships between political executive and civil servants; or unitary state combined with consensual executive, administrative culture of Rechtsstaat, and political relationships between political executive and civil servants. In particular, the combination of majoritarian executive, administrative culture of public interest, and divided relationships between political executive and civil servants is more important for the use of market-type mechanisms.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to examine relationships between governmental reform and institutional conditions. In order to explore this issue, this study is divided two steps. First, . the governmental reforms of 12 OECD member states were categorize...

    The purpose of this study is to examine relationships between governmental reform and institutional conditions. In order to explore this issue, this study is divided two steps. First, . the governmental reforms of 12 OECD member states were categorized into five reform types. Second, this study employed an explicitly Boolean approach to explain the linkages between governmental reform and institutional conditions. Analysis revealed two combinations linked to the outcome (market-type mechanisms): majoritarian executive combined with administrative culture of public interest, and divided relationships between political executive and civil servants; or unitary state combined with consensual executive, administrative culture of Rechtsstaat, and political relationships between political executive and civil servants. In particular, the combination of majoritarian executive, administrative culture of public interest, and divided relationships between political executive and civil servants is more important for the use of market-type mechanisms.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 송하중, "현정부의 행정개혁 추진체제 평가" 8 (8): 5-30, 1999

    2 최창수, "행정개혁, 절반의 성공: 신제도주의 동형화 관점에서의 사례분석" 서울행정학회 19 (19): 1-23, 2008

    3 민진, "한국와 영국의 행정개혁 비교" 32 (32): 37-52, 1998

    4 김병섭, "편견과 오류줄이기: 조사연구의 논리와 기법" 법문사 2008

    5 성지은, "정책과 제도의 수렴과 발산: 한일 행정개혁 과정을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 47 (47): 215-248, 2004

    6 김준기, "정부개혁의 국제적 동조화 현상, In 세계화 시대의 국가정책" 박영사 99-147, 2004

    7 박재완, "정부개혁 평가: 비참여자의 시각, In 정부개혁백서" 기획예산처 399-421, 1999

    8 임현진, "전지구화, 구조조정 및 민주주의: 한국의 비교경험" 24 (24): 51-78, 2002

    9 이윤식, "영국과 호주의 중앙정부 정부개혁에 관한 소고: 역사적 신제도주의적 관점을 중심으로" 한국공공관리학회 22 (22): 385-420, 2008

    10 이명석, "신공공관리론, 신거버넌스론, 그리고 김대중 정부의 행정개혁" 한국행정학회 305-321, 2001

    1 송하중, "현정부의 행정개혁 추진체제 평가" 8 (8): 5-30, 1999

    2 최창수, "행정개혁, 절반의 성공: 신제도주의 동형화 관점에서의 사례분석" 서울행정학회 19 (19): 1-23, 2008

    3 민진, "한국와 영국의 행정개혁 비교" 32 (32): 37-52, 1998

    4 김병섭, "편견과 오류줄이기: 조사연구의 논리와 기법" 법문사 2008

    5 성지은, "정책과 제도의 수렴과 발산: 한일 행정개혁 과정을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 47 (47): 215-248, 2004

    6 김준기, "정부개혁의 국제적 동조화 현상, In 세계화 시대의 국가정책" 박영사 99-147, 2004

    7 박재완, "정부개혁 평가: 비참여자의 시각, In 정부개혁백서" 기획예산처 399-421, 1999

    8 임현진, "전지구화, 구조조정 및 민주주의: 한국의 비교경험" 24 (24): 51-78, 2002

    9 이윤식, "영국과 호주의 중앙정부 정부개혁에 관한 소고: 역사적 신제도주의적 관점을 중심으로" 한국공공관리학회 22 (22): 385-420, 2008

    10 이명석, "신공공관리론, 신거버넌스론, 그리고 김대중 정부의 행정개혁" 한국행정학회 305-321, 2001

    11 소순창, "신공공관리(NPM)적 측면에서 본 행정개혁: 한국, 일본, 그리고 영국의 비교분석 *" 한국지방자치학회 16 (16): 319-342, 2004

    12 남궁근, "스칸디나비아 국가의 거버넌스와 개혁" 한울 2006

    13 정용덕, "세계화시대의 거버넌스, In 세계화 시대의 국가정책" 박영사 87-107, 2004

    14 이창길, "세계화 과정에서 정책의 동형화(Isomorphism) 메커니즘 분석: 인력감축, 정보공개 및 민영화 사례를 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 46 (46): 1-26, 2008

    15 김지희, "비교정치연구에 있어서 혼합체계 분석안의 방법론적 적실성: 인과추론방식을 중심으로" 35 (35): 265-275, 2001

    16 김웅진, "비교사회연구방법론" 한울아카데미 2000

    17 Ragin, C., "비교방법론" 대영문화사 1989

    18 최종고, "법학통론" 박영사 2006

    19 김근세, "ʻ작은정부ʼ 개혁의 수렴과 분산 : 문화와 정치제도 맥락의 비교분석" 한국행정연구원 19 (19): 3-31, 2011

    20 UN, "World Public Sector Report: Globalization and the State" 2001

    21 OECD, "Working for Results: The American Experience in Enhancing Government Performance" 2002

    22 Bennett, C. J., "What is policy convergence and what causes it?" 21 : 215-234, 1991

    23 Newman, P., "Urban Planning in Europe; International competition, national systems and planning projects" Routledge 1996

    24 Rhodes, R., "Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability" Open Univ. Press 1997

    25 Ragin, C., "USER’S GUIDE To Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis"

    26 "UN Public Administration Programme 홈페이지"

    27 Peters, B. G., "The future of governing: four emerging models" University Press of Kansas 1996

    28 Lynn, L., "The New Public Management: How to Transfer a Theme into a Legacy" 58 (58): 231-237, 1998

    29 Hood, C., "The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme" 20 (20): 93-109, 1995

    30 Rhodes, R., "The New Governance: Governing without government" 44 : 652-667, 1996

    31 Dunleavy, P., "The Globalization of Public Services Production: Can Government be ‘Best in the World?'" 9 (9): 36-64, 1994

    32 Kettl, D., "The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance" Brookings Institution 2000

    33 Micheletti, M., "The End of Big Government: is it Happening in the Nordic Countries?" 13 (13): 265-278, 2000

    34 Merryman, J. H., "The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America(2nd ed)" Stanford Univ. Press 1985

    35 Savoie, D., "Thatcher, Reagan, Mulroney: In Search of a New Bureaucracy" University of Toronto Press 1994

    36 Loughlin, J., "State traditions, administrative reform and regionalization, In The Political Economy of regionalism" Frank Cass 1997

    37 Ragin, C., "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage" 14 : 291-310, 2006

    38 McGuire, L., "Service Charters - Global Convergence or National Divergence?: A comparison of initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States" 3 (3): 493-524, 2001

    39 Kamensky, J., "Role of the ‘reinventing government’ movement in federal management reform" 56 (56): 247-255, 1996

    40 Kettl, D., "Reinventing Government? Appraising the National Performance Review" Brookings Institution 1994

    41 UN, "Reconstructing Public Administration after Conflict: Challenges, Practices and Lessons Learned"

    42 OECD, "Public Sector Modernisation"

    43 Lynn, L. E., "Public Management: Old and New" Routledge 2006

    44 Pollitt, C., "Public Management Reform: a comparative analysis" Oxford Univ. Press 2004

    45 Kickert, W., "Public Governance in the Netherlands: An Alternative to Anglo-American ‘Managerialism’" 75 (75): 731-752, 1997

    46 Ingraham, P., "Play It Again, Sam, It’s Still Not Right: Searching for the Right Notes in Administration Reform" Syracuse University 27-29, 1996

    47 OECD, "Performance Management in Government" OECD 1996

    48 OECD, "Performance Management Program in the Canadian Federal Public Service" 2002

    49 OECD, "Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries" OECD 2007

    50 UN, "People Matter Civic Engagement in Public Governance"

    51 Lijphart, A., "Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thiry-Six Countries" Yale Univ Press 1999

    52 Sartori, G., "Parties and party systems" Cambridge University press 1976

    53 OECD, "OECD Reviews of Human Resource Management in Government: Belgium" 2007

    54 "OECD Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development 홈페이지, In 국가별 보고서"

    55 OECD, "OECD Country Profiles" OECD 1997

    56 Loughlin, J., "Nation, state and region in Western Europe, In Culture: Building stone for Europe 2002" European Interuniversity Press 1994

    57 OECD, "Modernising Government : The Way Forward" OECD 2005

    58 OECD, "Models of Public Budgeting and Accounting Reform" 2 (2): 2002

    59 OECD, "Managing Across Levels of Government" OECD 1997

    60 Pollitt, C., "Managerialism and the Public Services: cuts or cultural change in the 1990s?" Blackwell 1993

    61 Pollitt, C., "Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience" Basil Blackwell 1990

    62 Wollmann, H., "Local government systems: from historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as comparative cases in point" 18 : 33-55, 2000

    63 OECD, "Linking Performance at Organisational and Individual Levels-National Report by France" 2005

    64 OECD, "In Search of Results: Performance Management Practices" OECD 1997

    65 OECD, "How to Manage Individual Performance-United Kingdom Country Report" 2002

    66 OECD, "Government of the Future"

    67 Rexed, K., "Governance of Decentralised Pay Setting in Selected OECD Countries" 2007

    68 Lynn, L., "Globalization and Administrative Reform: What is Happening in Theory?" Erasmus University 2000

    69 Lalenis, K., "Families of Nations and Institutional Transplantation, In GeoJournal Library" Kluwer 2002

    70 OECD, "Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making" OECD 2005

    71 OECD, "Dedicated Public-Private Partnership Units: A Survey of Institutional and Governance Structures" OECD 2010

    72 OECD, "Cutting Red Tape: Administrative Simplification in the Netherlands" 2007

    73 Lian, O. S., "Convergence or Divergence? Reforming Primary Care in Norway and Britain" 8 (8): 305-330, 2003

    74 Common, R. K., "Convergence and transfer: a review of the globalisation of new public management" 11 (11): 440-450, 1998

    75 Rihoux, B., "Configurational Comparative Methods" SAGE Publications 2009

    76 Pollitt, C., "Clarifying Convergence: Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform" 3 (3): 471-492, 2001

    77 Henderson, K., "Characterizing American public administration-The concept of administrative culture" 17 (17): 234-250, 2004

    78 Pierre, J., "Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration" Edward Elgar 1995

    79 Mascarenhas, R. C., "Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector: Reform of the Public Sector in Australia, Britain, and New Zealand" 53 (53): 319-328, 1993

    80 Jones, L. R., "Assessing Public Management Reform in an International Context" 4 (4): 1-19, 2003

    81 Pollitt, C., "Agency Fever? Analysis of an International Policy Fashion" 3 : 271-290, 2001

    82 Caiden, G. E., "Administrative reform comes of age" Walter de Gruyter 1991

    83 Anechiarico, F., "Administrative Culture and Civil Society: A Comparative Perspective" 30 (30): 13-34, 1998

    84 Hood, C., "A Public Management for All Seasons?" 69 (69): 3-19, 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.82 1.82 1.97
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.98 2.13 2.164 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼