Despite focus on prevention of needlestick injuries, intraoperative injuries involving suture needles have increased in the past two decades. When interruptions occur during surgery, a practitioner’s focus is disengaged, creating an “error space;...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O106607997
2021년
eng
0001-2092
1878-0369
SCOPUS;SCIE;SSCI
학술저널
AORN journal
586-594 [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Despite focus on prevention of needlestick injuries, intraoperative injuries involving suture needles have increased in the past two decades. When interruptions occur during surgery, a practitioner’s focus is disengaged, creating an “error space;...
Despite focus on prevention of needlestick injuries, intraoperative injuries involving suture needles have increased in the past two decades. When interruptions occur during surgery, a practitioner’s focus is disengaged, creating an “error space;” re‐engagement of the practitioner takes exponentially longer as each subsequent interruption occurs during the procedure. Human factors studies focus on the interaction between individuals and the environment in which they work (eg, processes, equipment). Researchers use a human factors approach to understand distractions during surgery. Using this methodology, wound closure is viewed as a standalone process and the effect of distractions and interruptions on suture needle injuries is examined. Competing priorities combined with interruptions present opportunities for altered situational awareness, which can lead to injury. This article redefines wound closure as a vulnerable time with great potential for error—a time during which distractions and interruptions can lead to suture needle injuries and other unexpected outcomes.
A Scoping Review of Strategies Used to Implement the Surgical Safety Checklist
AORN Global Surgical Conference & Expo 2021 Speaker Interviews