RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회체육학의 정체성 제고를 통한 발전방안 연구 = A Study on Development Plans through enhancing the identity of Sport and Leisure Studies

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108721331

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose The current study was conducted in an attempt to provide a development plan for the future of Sport and Leisure Studies by reviewing the identity of society of sport. Methods The review process included the appropriateness of society of sport terminology, clarity of research domain, and pertinence of disciplines covered in the KSSLS Journal. Extensive literature review and expert interview (n=20) were implemented for study analysis. Result Review of literature indicate the terminology of society of sport, adopted previously from sport industry and academia, is now being used predominantly as the underlying concept of sport for all. Expert opinions regarding the usage of this particular terminology ranged from forty percent (i.e., maintain current terminology) to twenty percent (i.e., new terminology, incorporating the overall aspects of sport, is required) to forty percent (i.e., make alterations pertaining to modern sport environment). A review in terms of the scholarly direction of KSSLS suggests, contrary to its current terminology, the likes of professionals of physical education, physical training, and disability sport are included as part of the broad domain. Expert opinions in this particular instance argue the scholarly boundaries of KSSL needs to be restricted to sport for all domain (45%) whereas fifty five percent suggest all sport domains should be included. Conclusion According to expert opinions, twenty five percent agree with the current state of categorization and seventy five percent believe rearrangement of lower order categories is necessary. The results of the current review expects to create thought provoking discussions amongst sport and leisure scholars, industry experts, and practitioners to promote sustainability and prosperity of the Sport and Leisure Studies.
      번역하기

      Purpose The current study was conducted in an attempt to provide a development plan for the future of Sport and Leisure Studies by reviewing the identity of society of sport. Methods The review process included the appropriateness of society of sport ...

      Purpose The current study was conducted in an attempt to provide a development plan for the future of Sport and Leisure Studies by reviewing the identity of society of sport. Methods The review process included the appropriateness of society of sport terminology, clarity of research domain, and pertinence of disciplines covered in the KSSLS Journal. Extensive literature review and expert interview (n=20) were implemented for study analysis. Result Review of literature indicate the terminology of society of sport, adopted previously from sport industry and academia, is now being used predominantly as the underlying concept of sport for all. Expert opinions regarding the usage of this particular terminology ranged from forty percent (i.e., maintain current terminology) to twenty percent (i.e., new terminology, incorporating the overall aspects of sport, is required) to forty percent (i.e., make alterations pertaining to modern sport environment). A review in terms of the scholarly direction of KSSLS suggests, contrary to its current terminology, the likes of professionals of physical education, physical training, and disability sport are included as part of the broad domain. Expert opinions in this particular instance argue the scholarly boundaries of KSSL needs to be restricted to sport for all domain (45%) whereas fifty five percent suggest all sport domains should be included. Conclusion According to expert opinions, twenty five percent agree with the current state of categorization and seventy five percent believe rearrangement of lower order categories is necessary. The results of the current review expects to create thought provoking discussions amongst sport and leisure scholars, industry experts, and practitioners to promote sustainability and prosperity of the Sport and Leisure Studies.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼