A great change was brought about to the international resource economic order, ever existing basic limitation in the side of supplydemand resources by OPEC,S weaponizing policy that had a great effect on the resource nationalism of the resource holdin...
A great change was brought about to the international resource economic order, ever existing basic limitation in the side of supplydemand resources by OPEC,S weaponizing policy that had a great effect on the resource nationalism of the resource holding developing country, which gave a chance for the resource nationalism to make a challenge to the existing resource controlling system systematically.
Above all, the subiect of management in supplement of resources characterized in maldistribution, multiconsumption and oligopoly was transferred into resource holding developing country demanding the permant rights about endowments resources, which. was resulted in the international dispute, influenced on oil-also-called strategis resources-Iron and non-ferrous metals.
Japan, however, advanced its postwar economic construction taking advantage of an opportunity of munitions boom during the Korean War, and increased an enormous resources demand in the progress of its economic construction. But in the 1960s increasing the struggle for making sure of the resources it was obliged to adjust demand and supply of resources.
Japanese goverment authorities changed the simple importable system of development resources in the result of adopting an effective policy to secure resources and the multinational enterprices as the center, more particularly among the private enterprices forwarded development of overseas resources.
They pushed forward the development import of the overseas resources under the strong protection and support of the necessary development fund from its government in the fields of finances, taxation systems, insurances and the like.
Recently, Japanese government carried forward 111 enterprices all over the world with multinational enterprices as the center.
With this policy for the overseas development import of Japan, export oriented foreign trade policy which brought profits to its own country and showed a marked trend toward the protectionism sytem, become the target of criticism from the counterports in trade becouse the policy reatively stimuatated them to the protectionism system.
Therefore, according to the principle that the frequencies in taking pant in the enterprises for the overseas development resources of Japan was determined by the domestic rate of economic growth and change of its industrial structures, the enterprises for developing the overseas resources should be push forward reasonaly from the long range point of view without stimulus of resource nationalism of counterpart in trade and holding resource country.
To do such things, the first is to meet the needs of developing countries holding resources, and the counterparts in trade to maintain themslves, and improve the balance of international payments and contribute to the economic development.
The second is to introduce the theory of fainess, and distribution to the international society, and set up the international economic orders, and change ethnocentric patterns of the goal of multinational enterprices into polycentric or geocentric.
The third is to have to be changed into a new policy based on structural reform of the national economy.