RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일본 해군 수로부의 오키 측량과 독도 인식 = Survey of Oki Island by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service and Its Recognition of Dokdo

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104120821

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to reveal the falsehood of Japan’s claim on Dokdo by referring to newly discovered documents which verify the fact that Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service recognized Dokdo as Korean territory before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo. Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service was the agency that recognized the territoriality of islands precisely and represented Japan’s official position on the issue. Survey Director Kimotsuki Kaneyuki recorded exactly in his survey report that the location of Oki island was in Lat. 35゚57'N~36゚18'N and in Long. 132゚~133゚23'E. He did not included Dokdo within that range.
      As he clearly recognized Dokdo as Korean territory, he neither made a survey nor kept a record of Dokdo. Dokdo was also not indicated in the maps that showed the whole routes of the second and third voyages around Japanese archipelago made by Ship Tsukuba in 1879 and 1883. Kato Shigenari conducted a survey of Oki island in 1884 and confirmed that Dokdo is beyond the range of Oki island by recording the location of Oki island in Lat. 35゚55'N~36゚27'N and in Long. 132゚44'~133゚31'E. These facts verify that Japanese government recognized exactly Dokdo as Korean territory. The survey made by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service had affected cartography by 1904, just before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo, and Dokdo was not indicated in any map.
      It is noteworthy that the contents of Complete Map of Oki which was mentioned in Hwanyeong-suroji(1886) accorded with those in Eungi-hoehang-yakki written by Kimotsuki. The facts that Hwanyeong-suroji was published with the approval of Hydrographic Service Director and that it provided basic data for publishing Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji before 1905 reveal that Kimotsuki’s recognition of Dokdo as Korean territory was clearly shared as an official opinion by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service and Japanese Government. This is also revealed in Ganhaeng-Suroji-Saegindo, published by Hydrographic Service in April 1908.
      Both Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji published before February 1905 recorded that Dokdo is Korean territory and Kimotsuki wrote the introduction for them. Thus it cannot be denied that he knew Dokdo as Korean territory more clearly than anybody else. Nevertheless, Kimotsuki instigated Nakai Yozaburo to change his original plan to submit a license application to Korean government and made the application submitted to Japanese government. This shows that Kimotsuki’s justification on the usurpation of Dokdo as terra nullius was a sophistry that denied truth and a betrayal of his conscience.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to reveal the falsehood of Japan’s claim on Dokdo by referring to newly discovered documents which verify the fact that Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service recognized Dokdo as Korean territory before Japan’s usurpation ...

      The purpose of this paper is to reveal the falsehood of Japan’s claim on Dokdo by referring to newly discovered documents which verify the fact that Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service recognized Dokdo as Korean territory before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo. Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service was the agency that recognized the territoriality of islands precisely and represented Japan’s official position on the issue. Survey Director Kimotsuki Kaneyuki recorded exactly in his survey report that the location of Oki island was in Lat. 35゚57'N~36゚18'N and in Long. 132゚~133゚23'E. He did not included Dokdo within that range.
      As he clearly recognized Dokdo as Korean territory, he neither made a survey nor kept a record of Dokdo. Dokdo was also not indicated in the maps that showed the whole routes of the second and third voyages around Japanese archipelago made by Ship Tsukuba in 1879 and 1883. Kato Shigenari conducted a survey of Oki island in 1884 and confirmed that Dokdo is beyond the range of Oki island by recording the location of Oki island in Lat. 35゚55'N~36゚27'N and in Long. 132゚44'~133゚31'E. These facts verify that Japanese government recognized exactly Dokdo as Korean territory. The survey made by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service had affected cartography by 1904, just before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo, and Dokdo was not indicated in any map.
      It is noteworthy that the contents of Complete Map of Oki which was mentioned in Hwanyeong-suroji(1886) accorded with those in Eungi-hoehang-yakki written by Kimotsuki. The facts that Hwanyeong-suroji was published with the approval of Hydrographic Service Director and that it provided basic data for publishing Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji before 1905 reveal that Kimotsuki’s recognition of Dokdo as Korean territory was clearly shared as an official opinion by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service and Japanese Government. This is also revealed in Ganhaeng-Suroji-Saegindo, published by Hydrographic Service in April 1908.
      Both Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji published before February 1905 recorded that Dokdo is Korean territory and Kimotsuki wrote the introduction for them. Thus it cannot be denied that he knew Dokdo as Korean territory more clearly than anybody else. Nevertheless, Kimotsuki instigated Nakai Yozaburo to change his original plan to submit a license application to Korean government and made the application submitted to Japanese government. This shows that Kimotsuki’s justification on the usurpation of Dokdo as terra nullius was a sophistry that denied truth and a betrayal of his conscience.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to reveal the falsehood of Japan’s claim on Dokdo by referring to newly discovered documents which verify the fact that Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service recognized Dokdo as Korean territory before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo. Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service was the agency that recognized the territoriality of islands precisely and represented Japan’s official position on the issue. Survey Director Kimotsuki Kaneyuki recorded exactly in his survey report that the location of Oki island was in Lat. 35゚57'N~36゚18'N and in Long. 132゚~133゚23'E. He did not included Dokdo within that range.
      As he clearly recognized Dokdo as Korean territory, he neither made a survey nor kept a record of Dokdo. Dokdo was also not indicated in the maps that showed the whole routes of the second and third voyages around Japanese archipelago made by Ship Tsukuba in 1879 and 1883. Kato Shigenari conducted a survey of Oki island in 1884 and confirmed that Dokdo is beyond the range of Oki island by recording the location of Oki island in Lat. 35゚55'N~36゚27'N and in Long. 132゚44'~133゚31'E. These facts verify that Japanese government recognized exactly Dokdo as Korean territory. The survey made by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service had affected cartography by 1904, just before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo, and Dokdo was not indicated in any map.
      It is noteworthy that the contents of Complete Map of Oki which was mentioned in Hwanyeong-suroji(1886) accorded with those in Eungi-hoehang-yakki written by Kimotsuki. The facts that Hwanyeong-suroji was published with the approval of Hydrographic Service Director and that it provided basic data for publishing Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji before 1905 reveal that Kimotsuki’s recognition of Dokdo as Korean territory was clearly shared as an official opinion by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service and Japanese Government. This is also revealed in Ganhaeng-Suroji-Saegindo, published by Hydrographic Service in April 1908.
      Both Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji published before February 1905 recorded that Dokdo is Korean territory and Kimotsuki wrote the introduction for them. Thus it cannot be denied that he knew Dokdo as Korean territory more clearly than anybody else. Nevertheless, Kimotsuki instigated Nakai Yozaburo to change his original plan to submit a license application to Korean government and made the application submitted to Japanese government. This shows that Kimotsuki’s justification on the usurpation of Dokdo as terra nullius was a sophistry that denied truth and a betrayal of his conscience.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to reveal the falsehood of Japan’s claim on Dokdo by referring to newly discovered documents which verify the fact that Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service recognized Dokdo as Korean territory before Japan’s usurpation ...

      The purpose of this paper is to reveal the falsehood of Japan’s claim on Dokdo by referring to newly discovered documents which verify the fact that Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service recognized Dokdo as Korean territory before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo. Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service was the agency that recognized the territoriality of islands precisely and represented Japan’s official position on the issue. Survey Director Kimotsuki Kaneyuki recorded exactly in his survey report that the location of Oki island was in Lat. 35゚57'N~36゚18'N and in Long. 132゚~133゚23'E. He did not included Dokdo within that range.
      As he clearly recognized Dokdo as Korean territory, he neither made a survey nor kept a record of Dokdo. Dokdo was also not indicated in the maps that showed the whole routes of the second and third voyages around Japanese archipelago made by Ship Tsukuba in 1879 and 1883. Kato Shigenari conducted a survey of Oki island in 1884 and confirmed that Dokdo is beyond the range of Oki island by recording the location of Oki island in Lat. 35゚55'N~36゚27'N and in Long. 132゚44'~133゚31'E. These facts verify that Japanese government recognized exactly Dokdo as Korean territory. The survey made by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service had affected cartography by 1904, just before Japan’s usurpation of Dokdo, and Dokdo was not indicated in any map.
      It is noteworthy that the contents of Complete Map of Oki which was mentioned in Hwanyeong-suroji(1886) accorded with those in Eungi-hoehang-yakki written by Kimotsuki. The facts that Hwanyeong-suroji was published with the approval of Hydrographic Service Director and that it provided basic data for publishing Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji before 1905 reveal that Kimotsuki’s recognition of Dokdo as Korean territory was clearly shared as an official opinion by Japanese Navy Hydrographic Service and Japanese Government. This is also revealed in Ganhaeng-Suroji-Saegindo, published by Hydrographic Service in April 1908.
      Both Chosun-suroji and Ilbon-suroji published before February 1905 recorded that Dokdo is Korean territory and Kimotsuki wrote the introduction for them. Thus it cannot be denied that he knew Dokdo as Korean territory more clearly than anybody else. Nevertheless, Kimotsuki instigated Nakai Yozaburo to change his original plan to submit a license application to Korean government and made the application submitted to Japanese government. This shows that Kimotsuki’s justification on the usurpation of Dokdo as terra nullius was a sophistry that denied truth and a betrayal of his conscience.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송병기, "울릉도와 독도, 그 역사적 검증" 역사공간 2010

      2 保坂祐二, "서양인들의 동해 탐방과 『수로지』속의 독도" 한국일본문화학회 (46) : 139-160, 2010

      3 신용하, "독도의 민족영토사 연구" 지식산업사 1996

      4 內藤正中, "독도와 죽도" 제이엔씨 2005

      5 호사카유지, "독도 = 다케시마 논쟁" 보고사 2008

      6 유미림, "근대 일본의 지리지에 나타난 울릉도·독도 인식" 한국해양수산개발원 2010

      7 송휘영, "근대 일본의 수로지에 나타난 울릉도․독도 인식" 대구사학회 106 : 241-270, 2012

      8 肝付兼行, "隱岐回航畧記" 19 : 1883

      9 東方覺之, "筑波艦日本環海周航記事" 74 : 1883

      10 内藤正中, "竹島=独島論争-歴史資料から考える" 新幹社 2007

      1 송병기, "울릉도와 독도, 그 역사적 검증" 역사공간 2010

      2 保坂祐二, "서양인들의 동해 탐방과 『수로지』속의 독도" 한국일본문화학회 (46) : 139-160, 2010

      3 신용하, "독도의 민족영토사 연구" 지식산업사 1996

      4 內藤正中, "독도와 죽도" 제이엔씨 2005

      5 호사카유지, "독도 = 다케시마 논쟁" 보고사 2008

      6 유미림, "근대 일본의 지리지에 나타난 울릉도·독도 인식" 한국해양수산개발원 2010

      7 송휘영, "근대 일본의 수로지에 나타난 울릉도․독도 인식" 대구사학회 106 : 241-270, 2012

      8 肝付兼行, "隱岐回航畧記" 19 : 1883

      9 東方覺之, "筑波艦日本環海周航記事" 74 : 1883

      10 内藤正中, "竹島=独島論争-歴史資料から考える" 新幹社 2007

      11 [海軍省]水路部, "水路部沿革史: 明治二年-十八年" 水路部 1916

      12 水路部, "朝鮮水路誌 全" 水路部 1894

      13 水路部, "朝鮮水路誌" 水路部 1899

      14 한철호, "明治時期 일본의 독도정책과 인식에 대한 연구 쟁점과 과제" 고려사학회 (28) : 319-352, 2007

      15 水路部, "日本水路誌 第4卷" 水路部 1897

      16 海上保安廳水路部, "日本水路史: 1871∼1971" 日本水路協會 1971

      17 肝付兼行, "日本北西岸水路畧記ノ一" 38 : 1883

      18 肝付兼行, "日本北西岸水路略記ノ二" 39 : 1883

      19 肝付兼行, "日本北西岸水路略記ノ三" 40 : 1883

      20 海軍水路部, "寰瀛水路誌 第1卷下" 海軍水路部 1886

      21 柏原長繁, "大日本環海航行記" 33 : 1883

      22 橫山伊德, "十九世紀日本近海測量について, In 地圖と繪圖の政治文化史" 東京大學出版會 2001

      23 水路部, "刊行水路誌索引圖" 海軍省水路部 1908

      24 堀和生, "1905年日本の竹島領土編入" 24 : 1987

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼