행정법령의 해석과 지방자치권

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Purpose of this study is to demonstrate the local autonomy in statutory interpretation, especially administrative statute on the basis of the constitutional guarantee of local autonomy, consequently to search the legal priority of local statutory interpretation over the central government, when there is a contradictory stipulation in administrative statutory interpretation.
In a country with codified law, statute law is of great importance as a main and dominant form of law. Because statutes are formulated in language, they have both need of interpretation and possibilities of diverse interpretation. It is more significant in administrative statute, because administrative statutes are characterized by indefinity of legal terms and heading for pubic interest in statutory interpretation.
The topic of statutory interpretation in administrative law has long been a major branch of legal practice as well as legal theory, these several interpretations in administrative statutes were actually construed as legal hot issues between the Administrative and the Court.
Nowadays, these possibilities of diverse interpretation in administrative statutes become an legal issue not only between the Administrative and the Court but also between the central government and the local government from the viewpoint of Local Autonomy.
It is traditional perception that the statutory interpretation of the central government has legal priority over that of the local government, when there is a contradictory stipulation in administrative statutory interpretation. But such traditional understanding has legal problem on the standpoint of the constitutional guarantee of local autonomy.
The local government has the right to dispose all affairs in local region on self-responsbility through the constitutional guarantee of Local Autonomy. As a result, Local Autonomy guaranteed by Constitution includes the autonomy of the local government in statutory interpretation, because autonomous statutory interpretation is a indispensable premise of autonomous adminstration.
Shortly concluded, the legal priority in statutory interpretation shall give to local government over the central government, when there is a contradictory stipulation mutually in administrative statutory interpretation. In the case of unjust or absurd result of statutory interpretation by the local government, the competence of illegality control is given to the judicature not the central government.
That is actualization of the true Constitutionalism in Local Autonomy.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문초록
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 법치행정원리와 행정법령의 해석
• Ⅲ. 행정법령의 해석 일반론
• Ⅳ. 지방자치 관련 행정법령의 해석
• Ⅴ. 행정법령에 대한 지방자치단체의 자치해석권의 문제
• Ⅵ. 결론을 대신하여
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정준현, "행정의 법해석권한과 그 형식에 관한 소고" 법학연구소 17 (17): 167-186, 2005

2 김유환, "행정법 해석의 원리와 해석상의 제문제" 한국법철학회 6 (6): 237-260, 2003

3 오세혁, "한국에서의 법령해석 ―우리나라 법원의 해석방법론에 대한 비판적 분석―" 한국법철학회 6 (6): 119-150, 2003

4 조성규, "지방자치제의 헌법적 보장의 의미" 30 (30): 2001

5 송영천, "지방자치제 시행과 관련한 각종 쟁송의 제문제"

6 문상덕, "지방자치단체의 자주적 법해석권" (5) : 1999

7 박동진, "전통적 의미의 법해석방법론에 관한 일고찰" 1997

8 신봉기, "우리나라 법령해석제도의 최신동향" 법학연구원 (35) : 221-254, 2011

9 홍정선, "신지방자치법" 박영사 2009

10 라인홀트 치펠리우스, "법학방법론" 삼영사 1995

11 심헌섭, "법철학적 법학방법론 - 법철학과 합리적 법학방법" 24 (24): 1983

12 이상윤, "법제처 법령해석제도의 현황과 과제" (51) :

13 김영환, "법의 흠결과 목적론적 축소해석" (334) : 1998

14 최봉철, "문언중심적 법해석론 비판" 3 :

15 兼子仁, "行政法學" 岩波書店 1997

16 高田 敏, "條例論" 8 : 1984

17 兼子仁, "條例をめぐる法律問題" 學陽書房

18 佐藤俊一, "地方自治要論" 成文堂 2002

19 原田尙彦, "地方自治体の法令解釋權, In ジュリスト總合特輯 No.19" 有斐閣 1980

20 Schmidt-Aßmann, "Kommunalrecht, Besonderes Verwaltungsrech"

21 Burgi, "Kommunalrecht, 2" Aufl 2008

22 Schmidt-Bleibtreu, "Klein, Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, 9" Aufl 1999

23 Sachs, "Grundgesetz Kommentar, 2" Aufl 1999