RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      등록상표와 주지ㆍ저명상표의 충돌 = The conflict between well-known trademarks and a registered trademark

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101838298

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The conflict between the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act is caused by a dual protection of well-known and famous trademarks by the two laws. Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act in Korea confirms the principle of...

      The conflict between the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act is caused by a dual protection of well-known and famous trademarks by the two laws. Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act in Korea confirms the principle of prior application of the Trademark Act and the supplementary status of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, while the Supreme Court's precedents incapacitate this article, citing the abuse of trademark rights in terms of legal principles, and put the Unfair Competition Prevention Act equal or superior to the Trademark Act.
      Focusing on it, this study examines respective functions of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the Trademark Act and relations to each other, and analyzes leading cases related to the conflict between the two laws.
      Concerning conflicts of rights between the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, in particular, in exercising rights under the Trademark Act, the study shows that the Supreme Court excludes Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act in many decision cases, including target decisions, citing ‘misuse or abuse of the Trademark Act’.
      Since such cases may harm legal stability by easily admitting abuse of rights under the Trademark Act without consistent criteria, efforts to maintain the intent of statutory provisions concerning the relations between the Trademark Law and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act are necessary.
      Alternative measures, such as introduction of prior user rights, or deletion of Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, can be considered, and options, such as allowing the registration to be nullified under the Trademark Act, as in the U.S. and Europe, if a trademark has been registered with any malicious intention, and making trademark rights invalid in case of any malicious trademark right exercises, can be reviewed for consideration.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 부정경쟁방지법과 상표법
      • Ⅲ. 주지ㆍ저명상표의 보호
      • Ⅳ. 등록상표와 주지ㆍ저명상표의 충돌
      • Ⅴ. 관련 판례
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 부정경쟁방지법과 상표법
      • Ⅲ. 주지ㆍ저명상표의 보호
      • Ⅳ. 등록상표와 주지ㆍ저명상표의 충돌
      • Ⅴ. 관련 판례
      • Ⅵ. 문제해결의 대안
      • Ⅶ. 결어
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼