The research is intended to satisfy two interesting research purposes: one is to examine activities of both BSC adotion phase and implementation phase under carrying BSC project. The second purpose is to analyze the influence from those ac...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76467294
2006
-
325
KCI등재후보
학술저널
45-62(18쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The research is intended to satisfy two interesting research purposes: one is to examine activities of both BSC adotion phase and implementation phase under carrying BSC project. The second purpose is to analyze the influence from those ac...
The research is intended to satisfy two interesting research purposes: one is to examine activities of both BSC adotion phase and implementation phase under carrying BSC project. The second purpose is to analyze the influence from those activities towards innovating business world. This study was conducted thru online questionnaires via online survey system during 3 months for targeting mainly on business users and consultants.<BR> The findings of the study suggest that employee"s involvement, BSC information sharing, collaboration cross task related teams have major roles to operate BSC successfully. From findings, KPI choice, top-down goal allocation, budgeting allocation have strong influences on upgrading business innovations. Those businesses like to considering adoption of BSC can benefit from the findings of the research.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "전략실행을 위한 전략적 성과측정 지표에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 63-92, 2000
2 "“The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance" 71-79, 1992
3 "Why the CEOs Fail" Fortune 1999June
4 "What Drivers the Performance of Financial Institutions?" University of Pennsylvania 1998
5 "Using the Balance Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" 74 (74): 75-85, 1996b
6 "The Strategy-Focused Organization" Harvard Business School Press 2001
7 "The Status of Communication Today" 1999
8 "The Information Executives Truly Need" 54-62, 1995
9 "The Impact of Activity-Based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance" 13 : 19-45, 2001
10 "The Development of the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management Tool" Cambridge UK 2002
1 "전략실행을 위한 전략적 성과측정 지표에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 63-92, 2000
2 "“The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance" 71-79, 1992
3 "Why the CEOs Fail" Fortune 1999June
4 "What Drivers the Performance of Financial Institutions?" University of Pennsylvania 1998
5 "Using the Balance Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" 74 (74): 75-85, 1996b
6 "The Strategy-Focused Organization" Harvard Business School Press 2001
7 "The Status of Communication Today" 1999
8 "The Information Executives Truly Need" 54-62, 1995
9 "The Impact of Activity-Based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance" 13 : 19-45, 2001
10 "The Development of the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management Tool" Cambridge UK 2002
11 "The Development of Strategic Performance Metrics" 7 (7): 24-32, 1995
12 "The Balanced on the Balanced Scorecard-Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions" 11 : 65-68, 2000
13 "The Balanced Scorecard: To adopt or not to adopt?" 2004
14 "The Balanced Scorecard: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Lead/Lag Relations" Ohio State University 2000
15 "The Balanced Scorecard : An Empirical Analysis of Its Effect on Manager’s Job Satisfaction and Performance Evaluations" LexingtonUniversity of Kentucky 2001
16 "The Balanced Scorecard : A Foundation for The Strategic Management of Information Systems" 25 : 71-88, 1999
17 "Statistical Tests for Moderator Variables Flaws in Analysis Recently Proposed" 161-182, 1987
18 "Organizational Communication: Development of Internal Strategic Competitive Advantage" 33 (33): 51-69, 1996
19 "Management by Objectives and The Balanced Scorecard: Will Rome Fall Again" 36 (36): 363-368, 1998
20 "Keeping Score- Using the right Metrics to drive world- class Performance" Quality Resource 1996
21 "Inside the Balanced Scorecard" 1-5, 1996January
22 "Innovations in Performance Measurement" 10 : 205-238, 1998
23 "Entrepreneurs Use a Balanced Scorecard to Translate Strategy into Performance Measures" 44 (44): 407-425, 2006
24 "Enabling a Whole New(and Customer-Focused) Structure at the DLA" 8-9, 2002
25 "Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard" 13 : 47-90, 2001
26 "Balance Scorecard Step-by- Step" John Wiley & Sons Inc 2002
27 "BSC의 핵심도구인 전략지도의 올바른 이해와 활용" 12 (12): 1-34, 2003
28 "BSC 성과지표간 인관관계 분석" 19 (19): 187-213, 2004
29 "Associating Balanced Scorecard Performance Reporting with Size and Market Factors Impact on Organizational Performance" Griffith University 1998
30 "Assessing Empirical Research in managerial Accounting" 32 : 349-410, 2001
31 "Applying the Balanced Scorecard to Small Companies" Management Accounting 21-27, 1997
32 "An Investigation of the Effect of Balanced Scorecard Implementation on Financial Performance" 15 (15): 135-153, 2004
33 "A Performance Measurement Model" 28 (28): 63-66, 1995
34 "A Dynamic Model of Customer’s Usage of Services Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction" 36 (36): 171-186, 1999
기술이전을 통한 기술사업화에 영향을 미치는 기업자원요인 탐색연구
플래시 컴포넌트와 서비스 API를 이용한 X-인터넷 개발 프레임워크 설계
공공기관의 특성을 고려한 PMI기반의 XML 접근제어 모델에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2014-05-28 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Society of IT Services -> Journal of Information Technology Services | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2006-08-11 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 한국SI학회지 -> 한국IT서비스학회지외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Society of System Integration -> Journal of the Korea Society of IT Services | |
2006-08-11 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국SI학회 -> 한국IT서비스학회영문명 : Korea Society Of System Integration -> Korea Society Of IT Services | |
2006-06-21 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국SI학회 -> 한국IT서비스학회영문명 : Korea Society Of System Integration -> Korea Society Of IT Services | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.5 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.48 | 0.47 | 0.627 | 0.17 |