RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      강상자형교 신축이음장치의 변형량 측정에 따른 설계온도 하중 평가

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Design specification for highway bridges (limit state design method) does not provide loads for calculating the amount of movement of expansion joints and movable supports. In this study, in order to evaluate the relationship between air temperature and expansion joint deformation, the temperature difference and strain of the clearance of expansion joints were calculated at the maximum temperature in summer and minimum temperature in winter. The expansion temperature ratio (R) values of the probabilities that do not exceed the design values are around 0.993, 1.019, and 1.067 times, respectively, calculated with a 90 %, 95 %, and 99 % normal distribution probability. These methods make it possible to design the amount of clearance change in reliable expansion joints based on probabilistic theory. Expansion temperature ratio was mostly distributed between 0.8 and 1.0. And It was noted that design of movement of expansion joints and movable supports with reliability based on theory of probability could be accomplished.
      번역하기

      Design specification for highway bridges (limit state design method) does not provide loads for calculating the amount of movement of expansion joints and movable supports. In this study, in order to evaluate the relationship between air temperature a...

      Design specification for highway bridges (limit state design method) does not provide loads for calculating the amount of movement of expansion joints and movable supports. In this study, in order to evaluate the relationship between air temperature and expansion joint deformation, the temperature difference and strain of the clearance of expansion joints were calculated at the maximum temperature in summer and minimum temperature in winter. The expansion temperature ratio (R) values of the probabilities that do not exceed the design values are around 0.993, 1.019, and 1.067 times, respectively, calculated with a 90 %, 95 %, and 99 % normal distribution probability. These methods make it possible to design the amount of clearance change in reliable expansion joints based on probabilistic theory. Expansion temperature ratio was mostly distributed between 0.8 and 1.0. And It was noted that design of movement of expansion joints and movable supports with reliability based on theory of probability could be accomplished.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이성행, "콘크리트 바닥판의 아스팔트 두께에 따른 강박스거더교의최고 설계 유효 온도 산정" 한국강구조학회 30 (30): 299-307, 2018

      2 이성행, "콘크리트 바닥판의 아스팔트 두께에 따른 강박스거더교의 최저 설계 유효 온도 산정" 한국강구조학회 31 (31): 23-30, 2019

      3 이성행, "강박스거더교의 설계 유효온도 산정을 위한 실험적 연구" 한국강구조학회 28 (28): 449-458, 2016

      4 Roeder, C.W., "Thermal Movement Design Procedure for Steel and Concrete Bridges – Final Report" National Cooperative Highway Research Program 2002

      5 Roeder, C. W., "Proposed Design Method for Thermal Bridge Movements" American Society of Civil Engineers 8 (8): 12-19, 2003

      6 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Highway Bridge Design Standard (Limit State Design)"

      7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Highway Bridge Design Standard"

      8 European Organisation for Technical Approvals, "Guideline for European Technical Approval of Expansion Joints for Road Bridges, Part 1: General (ETAG No. 032)"

      9 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Bridge Design Load (Limit Stage Design) (KDS 24 1221: 2016)"

      10 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (SI Units, 4th Ed.)"

      1 이성행, "콘크리트 바닥판의 아스팔트 두께에 따른 강박스거더교의최고 설계 유효 온도 산정" 한국강구조학회 30 (30): 299-307, 2018

      2 이성행, "콘크리트 바닥판의 아스팔트 두께에 따른 강박스거더교의 최저 설계 유효 온도 산정" 한국강구조학회 31 (31): 23-30, 2019

      3 이성행, "강박스거더교의 설계 유효온도 산정을 위한 실험적 연구" 한국강구조학회 28 (28): 449-458, 2016

      4 Roeder, C.W., "Thermal Movement Design Procedure for Steel and Concrete Bridges – Final Report" National Cooperative Highway Research Program 2002

      5 Roeder, C. W., "Proposed Design Method for Thermal Bridge Movements" American Society of Civil Engineers 8 (8): 12-19, 2003

      6 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Highway Bridge Design Standard (Limit State Design)"

      7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Highway Bridge Design Standard"

      8 European Organisation for Technical Approvals, "Guideline for European Technical Approval of Expansion Joints for Road Bridges, Part 1: General (ETAG No. 032)"

      9 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Bridge Design Load (Limit Stage Design) (KDS 24 1221: 2016)"

      10 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (SI Units, 4th Ed.)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.35 0.35 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.38 0.36 0.594 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼