경찰관직무집행법상 불심검문 = The Random Questioning in Act on the Performance Duties by Police Officers

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  The necessity and importance of the use of police authority are growing more and more in highly dangerous society of these days. Moreover, the danger related to the police, unlike in the past, causes significant damages to the benefit and protection of the law in nation and society, individual. Therefore, it needs to keep going concretely and efficiently to the prevention of danger in the police law.<BR>  In these days, random questioning acts as measures to prevent danger, especially to prevent the crime, most efficiently in the police operation, and takes a front seat by prevention of a crime and predetection and interception of a crime.<BR>  But regretably, random questioning is one of the compulsory measures used by national authorities and it is regarded as top priority to control and restrain random questioning because of the violation of human rights and fundamental rights protected under constitutional law by abusing it. Therefore, it has been in frequent collision between the police and a nation because random questioning in practical affairs is in between the public power and the human rights.<BR>  For the public concern over the violation of human rights and the control of the police operation, by imposing the abstract legal requisites and the rigid procedural limits, it is also true that random questioning as measures of the police operation to prevent a crime is not in effect. As a result, it can lead to the higher expense and the lower efficiency in the public security and administration, and weigh with the job performance of the police officers on duty by falling the public power.<BR>  In case of regarding random questioning in the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police officers as the significant measures, it is no doubtfully important task to study the plan of raising the efficiency of random questioning. Despite the concerns about the violation of the rights caused by abusing act of the police power, but because of sufficient measures done by the control of the court such as accumulation of the precedent and limit theory of the police authorities, it must be done to prevent the benefit and protection of the law in nation and society, individual through the use of the police authorities.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
  Ⅰ. 서론
  Ⅱ. 불심검문의 의의
  Ⅲ. 불심검문의 내용에 대한 법적 검토
  Ⅳ. 불심검문의 개선방안
  Ⅴ. 결론
  참고문헌
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재상, "형사소송법" 박영사 2003

2 신양균, "형사소송법" 법문사 2000

3 배종대, "형사소송법" 홍문사 2003

4 정성근, "형법총론" 법문사 1996

5 김남진, "행정법의 기본문제" 법문사 1998

6 홍정선, "행정법원론(하)" 박영사 2005

7 박균성, "행정법론(하)" 박영사 2004

8 신동운, "행사소송법Ⅰ" 법문사 1997

9 손동권, "한국형사사법의 현황과 발전방향" 한국형사정책연구원 8 (8): 1997

10 박윤흔, "최신행정법강의(하)" 박영사 2005

11 강구철, "즉시강제로서의 불심검문에 관한 고찰(하)" 한국사법행정학회 1982

12 이상규, "신행정법론(하)" 법문사 1995

13 김형준, "불심검문의 허용범위" 중앙법학회 6 (6): 2004

14 강동욱, "불심검문의 의의와 법적성격에 관한 고찰" 관동대학교 21 (21): 1993

15 임 웅, "불심검문의 실태와 개선에 관한 연구" 치안연구소 1997

16 탁희성, "불심검문의 실태와 개선방안" 한국형사정책연구원 1999

17 김태진, "불심검문의 법적 근거" 한국비교공법학회 4 (4): 2002

18 유인창, "불심검문에 관한 소고" 한국경찰학회 2 : 111-134, 2000

19 황창근, "불심검문에 관한 고찰" 연세법학회 6 (6): 1999

20 박외병, "불심검문상 정지의 의의와 한계" 경찰대학교 10 : 1995

21 이재상, "불심검문과 임의동행" 1987

22 이영란, "불심검문 실태와 개선에 관한 연구" 치안연구소 1997

23 강구진, "불심검문 및 임의동행에 관한 고찰(하)" 1983

24 강동욱, "불심검문" 고시원 1994

25 곽병선, "불심검문" 원광대 법학연구소 14 : 1997

26 임준태, "범죄예방론" 좋은세상 2002

27 허경미, "경찰행정법" 법문사 2003

28 김남진, "경찰행정법" 경세원 2002

29 이만종, "경찰불심검문의 적법성 한계에 관한 고찰" 한국공안행정학회 16 (16): 169-196, 2007

30 박상용, "경찰관직무집행법해설" 경찰청 2001

31 김재광, "경찰관직무집행법의 개선방안 연구" 한국법제연구원 2003

32 강동욱, "경찰관직무집행법상의 임의동행에 관한 고찰" 한양법학회 3 : 1992

33 신동운, "경찰관의 불심검문과 교통검문" 1993

34 김성수, "개별행정법" 법문사 2001

35 김남욱, "警察上의 調査에 관한 法的問題" 한국토지공법학회 33 : 179-206, 2006

36 古谷洋一, "註解警察官職務執行法" 入花書房 2000

37 渡?修, "職務質問の硏究" 成文堂 2001

38 土本武司, "犯罪搜査" 弘文堂 1980

39 戶基男, "法解警察官職務執行法" 成文堂 1998

40 田宮 裕, "刑事訴訟法入門" 有信堂 1989

41 河上和雄, "刑事訴訟の課題とその展望" 立化書房 1983