RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      상법‧자본시장법 및 조세법상 주식평가방법의 정합성 제고에 관한 시론적 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108517908

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Stock valuation acts as a determinant in adjusting the interests of corporate stakeholders, and has a direct impact on the tax burden due to stock transfer, inheritance, and gift. The key to stock valuation is fair market price. Only when the fair pri...

      Stock valuation acts as a determinant in adjusting the interests of corporate stakeholders, and has a direct impact on the tax burden due to stock transfer, inheritance, and gift. The key to stock valuation is fair market price. Only when the fair price or market price of stocks is found can the merger ratio, sales price, issue price, or purchase price be judged appropriately, and taxable income corresponding to the taxable power can be calculated. The Commercial Act, Capital Markets Act and tax laws adopt different standards or methods for stock valuation, which makes it difficult for companies and their stakeholders, as well as individuals and corporate taxpayers to make reasonable judgments and have to bear unnecessary efforts and costs.
      The main purpose of the stock valuation standards in the Commercial Act and the Capital Markets Act is to find a fair market price and reasonably adjust the interests of business people. To achieve this goal, first of all, it is necessary to find a fair price that corresponds to the real value of the stock, and to do so, stock valuation factors such as market value, asset value, earnings value, and relative value must be appropriately utilized according to specific cases.
      In order to impose taxation according to the taxpayers abilities of payment with ‘equality of tax burden principal’, a fair market price corresponding to the real value of stocks must be found. In the case of giving diversity to stock evaluation factors, ‘principle of no taxation without law’ may be damaged due to low predictability and legal stability. The tax laws have clear regulations on stock valuation standards, so even if it falls short of ‘equality of tax burden principal’, a choice is made to increase predictability in order to secure legal stability.
      Even so, it is desirable for corporate stakeholders and taxpayers to unify matters that can be unified between the Commercial Act, the Capital Markets Act, the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act, the Corporate Tax Act and the Income Tax Act in relation to stock valuation standards. It is because the Commercial Act and the Capital Markets Act and tax laws that the standards or methods for stock valuation are different are similarly legal and governmental regulations from the point of view of corporate stakeholders and taxpayers, and lead to costs.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 주식평가가 문제되는 경우와 주식평가의 규율체계
      • Ⅱ. 상법 및 자본시장법상의 주식평가방법
      • Ⅲ. 조세법상의 주식평가
      • Ⅳ. 상법‧자본시장법 및 조세법 간 주식평가방법의 정합성 제고방안
      • Ⅴ. 결어
      • Ⅰ. 주식평가가 문제되는 경우와 주식평가의 규율체계
      • Ⅱ. 상법 및 자본시장법상의 주식평가방법
      • Ⅲ. 조세법상의 주식평가
      • Ⅳ. 상법‧자본시장법 및 조세법 간 주식평가방법의 정합성 제고방안
      • Ⅴ. 결어
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼