족관절 골절 수술을 위한 정형외과 의사의 초음파 유도 대퇴좌골 신경 차단 = Ultrasound-guided Femorosciatic Nerve Block by Orthopaedist for Ankle Fracture Operation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block by orthopaedist to operate the fracture around ankle. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients, who had an operation for fracture around the ankle under a ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block from January to April 2010, were the targets of this study. We measured the time spent for the ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block, the time taken to start the operation after the nerve block, the time taken to deflate the tourniquet because of a tourniquet pain, the time passed until feeling a postoperative pain after the operation, etc. We also studied the complications and satisfaction of the anesthesia. Results: It took 6.2 (3 to 12) minutes for the nerve block, 46.1 (28 to 75) minutes to start the operation, 52.5 (22 to 78) minutes until feeling a tourniquet pain and 11.5 (7.5 to 19) hours until starting to feeing a postoperative pain. There was no complication by anesthesia and 21 people (95.5%) were satisfied with anesthesia by ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block by orthopaedist in the fracture around ankle reduces anesthetic and nerve injury complication, and leads to high anesthetic success rate. Also it is considered as an effective method to alleviate postoperative pain.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Flaatten H, "anaesthesia for outpatient surgery" 40 : 1108-1111, 2007

2 Gold BS, "Unanticipated admission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery" 262 : 3008-3010, 1989

3 Marhofer P, "Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia" 94 : 7-17, 2005

4 Perlas A, "Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa" 33 : 259-365, 2008

5 Domingo-Triadó V, "Ultrasound guidance for lateral midfemoral sciatic nerve block: a prospective, comparative, randomized study" 104 : 1009-1011, 2007

6 Varitimidis SE, "Triple nerve block at the knee for foot and ankle surgery performed by the surgeon: difficulties and efficiency" 30 : 854-859, 2009

7 Hamilton PD, "Sciatic nerve blockade: a survey of orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists in North America and the United Kingdom" 30 : 1196-1201, 2009

8 Sinardi D, "Sciatic nerve block with lateral popliteal approach for hallux valgus correction. Comparison between 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine" 70 : 625-629, 2004

9 McClellan KJ, "Ropivacaine. An update of its use in regional anaesthesia" 60 : 1065-1093, 2000

10 Myerson MS, "Regional anesthesia for foot and ankle surgery" 13 : 282-288, 1992

11 Mendicino RW, "Popliteal sciatic nerve blocks after foot and ankle surgery: An adjunct to postoperative analgesia" 41 : 338-441, 2002

12 Rongstad K, "Popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative analgesia" 17 : 378-382, 1996

13 Hansen E, "Popliteal fossa neural blockade as the sole anesthetic technique for outpatient foot and ankle surgery" 21 : 38-44, 2000

14 Migues A, "Peripheral foot blockagde versus popliteal fossa nerve block: a prospective randomized trial in 51 patients" 44 : 354-357, 2005

15 Curatolo M, "Failure rate of epidural anaesthesia for foot ankle surgery: A comparison with other surgical procedures" 12 : 363-367, 1995

16 Brown DL, "Ed. Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia. Philadelphia:W.B" W.B. Saunders 1996

17 Casati A, "Clinical properties of levobupivacaine or racemic bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block" 14 : 111-114, 2002

18 Rudkin GE, "Bilateral ankle blocks: a prospective audit" 75 : 39-42, 2005

19 Casati A, "A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block" 94 : 987-990, 2002

20 Triado VD, "A comparison of lateral popliteal versus lateral midfemoral sciatic nerve blockade using ropivacaine 0.5%" 29 : 23-27, 2004

21 Fernandez-Guisasola J, "A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa" 45 : 967-970, 2001