유럽연합(EU)와의 자유무역협정(FTA) 체결에 따른 노동서비스 개방에 대한 연구 -영국·독일·프랑스의 교육훈련제도 및 인력공급제도를 중심으로- = A Study about the Labor Market Opening with the FTA Conclusion with EU and Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Free Trade Agreement (FTA) has become one of the most highly debated issues in global society. FTA is to bring down all or certain trade barriers including tariffs and customs exclusively among the members of the nations to allow the goods and services to be traded freely. Compared to WTO which is a multilateral trade system to ensure the most favored nation treatment among all members, FTA is more of bilateral or regional preferential trade system among the members or the region.
FTA, in general, is considered to be able to open a bigger market so that investments and exports of products and services with comparative advantages would be encouraged, enhanced, and eventually create larger trade productivity. However, the downside of it is that relatively smaller industries of either party might have to close down the business due to their far less competitiveness in the market.
The EU is finally engaging seriously with Asia. While its official trade priority is the successful conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA), the EU announced in April the opening of negotiations on three bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), India and Korea.
So what's in it for Korea? Korea as well as the EU, has much to gain from an FTA. The EU is larger and richer than the United States, so the trade potential is that much greater. From a strategic viewpoint, the commercial presence of the EU in Asia would also counterbalance the influence of the United States and the dominance of China. But more importantly the EU's sharply different social model compared to that of the United States influences the EU's attempt to ensure that any FTA contains social clauses covering sustainable development and core labor standards.
Another issue is the problems of opening of labor market. As is generally known, a worker can move in EU precincts freely. As a result, workers from a cheap place to a high place of personnel expenses come to move. In addition, a system to regulate dispatch labor and contract labor is got ready.
In contrast, the preparations that possessed it for Korea and the FTA conclusion with EU are insufficient because atypical labor protection law and dispatch labor law were got ready recently in Korea. After FTA with EU was concluded with Korea, if EU side demand the opening of the labor market from Korea side, it is expected when various problems produce it.
In or the to solve such a problem, A study about a worker supply systems and education training systems in the major countries among EU, such as the U.K., Germany and France. It seems that this research sponsors one suggestion for the problems solving that I took up in the above.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장신철, "프랑스 국립고용청(ANPE) 개혁동향" 10 : 32-36, 2006

2 "유럽연합조약 제32조와 제43조"

3 하세정, "영국의 레이치보고서 : 장기 기술력 증진 개혁안" 73-74, 2007

4 심재진, "영국의 노동이민정책의 최근 변화" 17-19, 2006

5 최저임금위원회, "비정규직에 관한 EU국가의 최근 입법경향" 2003

6 노사정위원회, "비정규직 근로자 대책 공익위원(안)" 2003

7 김기선, "독일의 파견근로 현황" 71-, 2007

8 Hans-Dieter Schinner, "독일의 직업교육훈련과 고용" 11-, 2007

9 유성재, "독일 근로자파견법의 개정과 시사점" 한국노동법학회 (19) : 1-28, 2004

10 JILPT, "先進諸国の雇用戦略に関する研究" 2004

11 JILPT, "パートタイマと正社員の均衡処遇" 2005

12 JILPT, "ドイツ・フランス有期労働契約法政調査研究報告" 2004

13 "www.assedic.fr"

14 "www.anpe.fr"

15 "http://www.pub.arbeitsamt.de/hst/services/statistik/200606/iiia6/aueg/auegd.pdf"

16 "http://www.netlawman.co.uk/acts/employment-agencies-act-1973-and-regulations.php"

17 "http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/leitch"

18 "http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/press-releases"

19 "Montgomery v. Johnson Underwood Ltd. 사건"