RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일반소멸시효의 기산점 판단법리의 기원 ― Boissonade 민법초안부터 메이지민법 제정까지 ― = The Origin of the Interpretation that Determines the Commencement of Extinctive Prescription ― Draft Civil Code of Boissonade and Commencement of Extinctive Prescription ―

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the Boissonade draft of the Civil Code, the extinctive prescription period of 30 years or the 20-year period of the Meiji Civil Code has been acknowledged to consider the circumstances where a creditor cannot exercise his/her rights. Finally, the c...

      In the Boissonade draft of the Civil Code, the extinctive prescription period of 30 years or the 20-year period of the Meiji Civil Code has been acknowledged to consider the circumstances where a creditor cannot exercise his/her rights. Finally, the current Japanese Civil Law reduced the period of extinctive prescription to 10 years.
      The Korean and Japanese orthodox and precedents, consider the 10-year extinctive prescription period as the normal extinctive prescription period, and regard the commencement of extinctive prescription as ‘when the rights can be exercised’.
      However, in consideration of the Boissonade draft of Civil Code and the Meiji draft of Civil Code, as discussed in this paper, the incentive to strictly interpret ‘when the rights can be exercised’ could be removed by shortening the term of extinctive prescription to 10 years.
      In short, the 10-year extinctive prescription period for creditor rights in general is a short-term extinctive prescription period that is not sufficiently considered for the possibility of a de facto failure (not at least a long-term extinctive prescription period).
      Therefore, Korean orthodox and precedents, which judge the commencement of extinctive prescription only as a legal obstacles, should be reconsidered.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼