RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      '두 개의 중국'과 화교정책의 분기  :  반둥회의(1955) 전후를 중심으로 = 'Two China' and a Divergence of the Overseas Chinese Policy ― A Comparison between Before and After the Bandung Conference of 1955 ―

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82264592

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The divergence of overseas Chinese policies between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (commonly known as Taiwan) arises from the asymmetric conditions of two countries. The overseas Chinese has now become a debt, not an asset, to CCP who won the Chinese Civil War and came into power in the mainland. The reason for this is that Chinese residents abroad with dual nationality are becoming an obstacle to improving CCP's relationships with its neighboring countries. The Communists needed to abolish dual nationality in order to get rid of the neighboring countries' worries about the spread of China's communist revolution. Since CCP could not have been enjoying a legal status in the international community as well as the United Nations, it couldn't help but place weight on improving its international relations. It is particularly important that there was an intention to settle the issue of Taiwan's sovereignty behind mainland China's strategic decision to give up the overseas Chinese. Indeed, China's situation itself as a divided country was the essential cause of bringing about great change in its overseas Chinese policy. However, the abolition of overseas Chinese's dual nationality rather gave the Kuomintang (Nationalist Party) a golden opportunity to revive its influence. The support of Chinese residents in Southeast Asia was urgently needed by the Nationalists who had retreated to Taiwan after defeat in the civil war. It was indispensable to obtain support from overseas Chinese for securing the legitimacy of their political power in Taiwan and defending the national existence of the country. The Nationalists focused most of their efforts on the policies of permitting overseas Chinese to maintain dual nationality and granting them special benefits, and as a result Taiwan could be reborn as a new fatherland of overseas Chinese. Such a close relationship between Taiwan and overseas Chinese, who had have almost no connection to each other until 1950s, was a paradoxical outcome of the divided country's situation represented by “two China”.
      However, attention should be paid the fact that when viewed in light of the history of China-Asia relations, the abolition of dual nationality takes on a different meaning. The reason that the Qing Empire identified overseas Chinese as its citizens at first was based on its previous presence in Southeast Asian countries. The nationality law of “jus sanguinis” was the empire's final attempt to maintain its status as a great nation when it began to decline. If this is accepted, the abolition of overseas Chinese's dual nationality has a new significance in that there was a major modification to China's great-power diplomacy that had been taken over to both the Nationalists and Communists since the late Qing Empire. The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence agreed to by China and India was also a declaration guaranteeing that major and minor powers in the region would coexist with equal rights.
      When we look back on it, the Bandung Conference was the first conference where Southeast Asian countries met under equal conditions as sovereign nations within the modern international system. It was the first stage to reform the traditional relations between major and minor powers in Southeast Asia. One thing confirmed from the conference is that the Southeast Asia region's prototypical nationalism(nationalism from China), had been already converted into nationalism for or against China with the emergence of newly independent countries. The abolition of dual nationality was a gesture of friendship that the People's Republic of China made to remain a neighbor to Asian countries in the new international environment. Further, the effect of the action was to remove the legal system that had resulted from the colonial idea about Southeast Asia, in order to build 'neutral Asia'. Consequently, China's Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and participation in the Bandung Conference in
      번역하기

      The divergence of overseas Chinese policies between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (commonly known as Taiwan) arises from the asymmetric conditions of two countries. The overseas Chinese has now become a debt, not an asset, t...

      The divergence of overseas Chinese policies between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (commonly known as Taiwan) arises from the asymmetric conditions of two countries. The overseas Chinese has now become a debt, not an asset, to CCP who won the Chinese Civil War and came into power in the mainland. The reason for this is that Chinese residents abroad with dual nationality are becoming an obstacle to improving CCP's relationships with its neighboring countries. The Communists needed to abolish dual nationality in order to get rid of the neighboring countries' worries about the spread of China's communist revolution. Since CCP could not have been enjoying a legal status in the international community as well as the United Nations, it couldn't help but place weight on improving its international relations. It is particularly important that there was an intention to settle the issue of Taiwan's sovereignty behind mainland China's strategic decision to give up the overseas Chinese. Indeed, China's situation itself as a divided country was the essential cause of bringing about great change in its overseas Chinese policy. However, the abolition of overseas Chinese's dual nationality rather gave the Kuomintang (Nationalist Party) a golden opportunity to revive its influence. The support of Chinese residents in Southeast Asia was urgently needed by the Nationalists who had retreated to Taiwan after defeat in the civil war. It was indispensable to obtain support from overseas Chinese for securing the legitimacy of their political power in Taiwan and defending the national existence of the country. The Nationalists focused most of their efforts on the policies of permitting overseas Chinese to maintain dual nationality and granting them special benefits, and as a result Taiwan could be reborn as a new fatherland of overseas Chinese. Such a close relationship between Taiwan and overseas Chinese, who had have almost no connection to each other until 1950s, was a paradoxical outcome of the divided country's situation represented by “two China”.
      However, attention should be paid the fact that when viewed in light of the history of China-Asia relations, the abolition of dual nationality takes on a different meaning. The reason that the Qing Empire identified overseas Chinese as its citizens at first was based on its previous presence in Southeast Asian countries. The nationality law of “jus sanguinis” was the empire's final attempt to maintain its status as a great nation when it began to decline. If this is accepted, the abolition of overseas Chinese's dual nationality has a new significance in that there was a major modification to China's great-power diplomacy that had been taken over to both the Nationalists and Communists since the late Qing Empire. The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence agreed to by China and India was also a declaration guaranteeing that major and minor powers in the region would coexist with equal rights.
      When we look back on it, the Bandung Conference was the first conference where Southeast Asian countries met under equal conditions as sovereign nations within the modern international system. It was the first stage to reform the traditional relations between major and minor powers in Southeast Asia. One thing confirmed from the conference is that the Southeast Asia region's prototypical nationalism(nationalism from China), had been already converted into nationalism for or against China with the emergence of newly independent countries. The abolition of dual nationality was a gesture of friendship that the People's Republic of China made to remain a neighbor to Asian countries in the new international environment. Further, the effect of the action was to remove the legal system that had resulted from the colonial idea about Southeast Asia, in order to build 'neutral Asia'. Consequently, China's Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and participation in the Bandung Conference in

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. '두 개의 중국'과 '국공외전'
      • 3. 중화인민공화국, 아시아의 이웃되기
      • 4. 대만, 화교의 새 조국으로
      • 5. 결론
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. '두 개의 중국'과 '국공외전'
      • 3. 중화인민공화국, 아시아의 이웃되기
      • 4. 대만, 화교의 새 조국으로
      • 5. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼