RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Effects of Listening Encoding Strategy Use on Korean EFL Learners’ EAP Listening Comprehension

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103567116

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Cha, Hyun Ji. (2016). The Effects of Listening Encoding Strategy Use on Korean EFL Learners’ EAP Listening Comprehension. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(2), 73-100. The present study examined intermediate EFL Korean College students...

      Cha, Hyun Ji. (2016). The Effects of Listening Encoding Strategy Use on Korean EFL Learners’ EAP Listening Comprehension. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(2), 73-100. The present study examined intermediate EFL Korean College students’ academic listening comprehension when they listened to different types of EAP (English for academic purposes) listening texts such as lectures and academic seminars. The current study would examine whether there would be any differences between lecture listening and academic seminar listening. This study would look into what impact these listening encoding strategies would have on listening comprehension. Their performance was based on several tests such as recognition tests, free recall tests and cued recall tests. The results presented that there was a statistically difference between note-taking and listening-only. Note-taking significantly influenced EFL college learners’ academic listening comprehension. There was a statistically significant effect of proficiency on listening comprehension. Learners in the high-intermediate level performed better on listening comprehension than those in the low-intermediate level. The result revealed a significant difference between outlining and listening-only in recognition tests. Outlining was statistically different from note-taking in free recall tests. In addition, a significant difference between note-taking and listening-only in free recall tests was detected. The result showed a significant difference between outlining and note-taking on academic listening of free recall tests. There was a significant difference between note-taking and listening-only on academic listening of free recall tests. High-intermediate learners reported that in academic seminars and lectures, note-taking strategy was useful. For high-intermediate learners, guiding outline to listening to academic seminars and lectures was helpful. High-intermediate listeners were likely to outperform other groups in cued recall tests and reported this test as the easiest one.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 오희정, "영어 듣기 전략 지도의 효과" 현대영어교육학회 12 (12): 283-304, 2011

      2 김동규, "메모하기 전략이 EFL 대학생들의 영어 듣기 능력에 미치는 영향" 현대영어교육학회 9 (9): 110-126, 2008

      3 Pagoda Language Education Institute, "The iBT TOEFL Beginner Listening" Pagoda Books 2013

      4 송민영, "The effect of the notetaking format on L2 learners’ notetaking process and strategy use" 한국응용언어학회 26 (26): 351-380, 2010

      5 Park, G., "The effect of strategy instruction on listening comprehension" 54 (54): 3-16, 1999

      6 양진숙, "The Role of Note-taking in L2 Listening Performance" 팬코리아영어교육학회 22 (22): 99-115, 2010

      7 Hedge, T., "Teaching and learning in the language classroom" Oxford University Press 2000

      8 Vandergrift, L., "Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference : An empirical study" 60 (60): 470-497, 2010

      9 Field, J., "Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening" 36 : 35-51, 2008

      10 Kiewra, K., "Providing the instructor’s notes : An effective addition to student notetaking" 20 (20): 33-39, 1985

      1 오희정, "영어 듣기 전략 지도의 효과" 현대영어교육학회 12 (12): 283-304, 2011

      2 김동규, "메모하기 전략이 EFL 대학생들의 영어 듣기 능력에 미치는 영향" 현대영어교육학회 9 (9): 110-126, 2008

      3 Pagoda Language Education Institute, "The iBT TOEFL Beginner Listening" Pagoda Books 2013

      4 송민영, "The effect of the notetaking format on L2 learners’ notetaking process and strategy use" 한국응용언어학회 26 (26): 351-380, 2010

      5 Park, G., "The effect of strategy instruction on listening comprehension" 54 (54): 3-16, 1999

      6 양진숙, "The Role of Note-taking in L2 Listening Performance" 팬코리아영어교육학회 22 (22): 99-115, 2010

      7 Hedge, T., "Teaching and learning in the language classroom" Oxford University Press 2000

      8 Vandergrift, L., "Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference : An empirical study" 60 (60): 470-497, 2010

      9 Field, J., "Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening" 36 : 35-51, 2008

      10 Kiewra, K., "Providing the instructor’s notes : An effective addition to student notetaking" 20 (20): 33-39, 1985

      11 Vandergrift, L., "Orchestrating strategy use : Toward a model of the skilled second language listener" 53 (53): 463-496, 2003

      12 Song, M., "Note-taking quality and performance on an L2 academic listening test" 29 (29): 67-89, 2012

      13 Field, J., "Listening in the Language Classroom" Cambridge University Press 2008

      14 O'Malley, J., "Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition" 10 (10): 418-437, 1989

      15 Bozorgian, H., "Enhancing foreign language through listening strategies delivered in L1 : An experimental study" 6 (6): 105-122, 2013

      16 김정현, "Effects of note-taking strategy training on Korean college students' perceptions and performance on academic English listening tests" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

      17 Lynch, T., "Academic listening in the 21st century : Reviewing a decade of research" 10 : 79-88, 2011

      18 Chaudron, C., "A Guide for the teaching of second language listening" Dominie Press 74-96, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-03-14 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Linguistic Association of Korea KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.32
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.32 0.32 0.704 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼