건축구조설계 허가심사제도 개선에 관한 연구 - 한 · 일 심사제도의 비교를 통해서 -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this study, the necessity of reorganization of the construction review system, which makes safety management mandatory regardless of scale, was examined for the efficient evaluation of building structures directly connected to the safety of the building. To this end, first, the expertise of each countrys building permit examination was identified by comparing Korean and overseas building permit systems. Second, the problems were identified by comparing specific methods of examining and operating construction permits in Korea and Japan. Third, a survey was conducted for 91 experts who are actually engaged in construction-related work on the contents related to structural review and whether the reviewer was qualified in terms of building permits. Through this, a direction for improvement of the current architectural review system was suggested. As a result of the survey, the necessity of the building permit system was high, but a review was required for the length of the permit period. For a professional and unified architectural structure review, it is necessary to cultivate professional reviewers who have undergone unified examination education and qualification tests, and to clearly define and maintain the flow of examination. Based on improvement of the permit system and improvement of the review process, the review period will be shortened, and it is expected that a more advanced architectural structure review system will be established through mutual understanding and trust building.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 건축허가제도
• 3. 한 · 일 건축구조관련법
• 4. 한 · 일 건축허가 심사제도
• 5. 국내 건축허가심사제도 운영의 과제
• 6. 설문조사
• 7. 결론
• REFERENCES