1 국립문화재연구소, "국외소재한국문화재목록"
2 "http://www.gbcs.or.kr/"
3 Derek Fincham, "Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities" 37 : 145-180, 2010
4 Bert Demarsin, "The Third Time is Not Always a Charm: The Troublesome Legacy of a Dutch Art Dealer--The Limitation and Act of State Defenses in Looted Art Cases" 28 : 255-272, 2010
5 Bert Demarsin, "The Third Time is Not Always a Charm: The Troublesome Legacy of a Dutch Art Dealer--The Limitation and Act of State Defenses in Looted Art Cases" 28 : 264-272, 2010
6 Gillian Flynn, "The Recovery of Stolen Cultural Property in the State of Maryland" 38 : 3103-113, 2008
7 Steven Grover, Note, "The Need for Civil-Law Nations to Adopt Discovery Rules in Art Replevin Actions: A Comparative Study" 70 : 1431-1457, 1992
8 Steven A. Bibas, "The Case Against Statutes of Limitations for Stolen Art" 103 : 2437-2460, 1994
9 "Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 08-29(1)"
10 Mary Ellen West, "Special or Limited Right to Possession, 16A Cal. Jur. 3d Creditors' Rights and Remedies § 473"
1 국립문화재연구소, "국외소재한국문화재목록"
2 "http://www.gbcs.or.kr/"
3 Derek Fincham, "Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities" 37 : 145-180, 2010
4 Bert Demarsin, "The Third Time is Not Always a Charm: The Troublesome Legacy of a Dutch Art Dealer--The Limitation and Act of State Defenses in Looted Art Cases" 28 : 255-272, 2010
5 Bert Demarsin, "The Third Time is Not Always a Charm: The Troublesome Legacy of a Dutch Art Dealer--The Limitation and Act of State Defenses in Looted Art Cases" 28 : 264-272, 2010
6 Gillian Flynn, "The Recovery of Stolen Cultural Property in the State of Maryland" 38 : 3103-113, 2008
7 Steven Grover, Note, "The Need for Civil-Law Nations to Adopt Discovery Rules in Art Replevin Actions: A Comparative Study" 70 : 1431-1457, 1992
8 Steven A. Bibas, "The Case Against Statutes of Limitations for Stolen Art" 103 : 2437-2460, 1994
9 "Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 08-29(1)"
10 Mary Ellen West, "Special or Limited Right to Possession, 16A Cal. Jur. 3d Creditors' Rights and Remedies § 473"
11 Stephen L. Foutty, "Recent Development, Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc.: Entrenchment of the Due Diligence Requirement in Replevin Actions for Stolen Art" 43 : 1839-1844, 1990
12 Christopher Staker, "Public International Law and the Lex Situs Rule in Property Conflicts and Foreign Expropriations" 58 : 151-164, 1988
13 Steven F. Grover, "Note, The Need for Civil-Law Nations to Adopt Discovery Rules in Art Replevin Actions: A Comparative Study" 70 : 1431-1444, 1992
14 Mary Ellen West, "Necessity of demand Particular circumstances, — 16A Cal. Jur. 3d Creditors' Rights and Remedies § 481"
15 Ruth Redmond-Cooper, "Limitation of Actions in Art and Antiquity Claims Part II" 5 : 185-203, 2000
16 Francesco Galgano, "Legal Aspects of Trade in Art in Italy, in Workship International Sales of Works of Art" 121-129, 1985
17 Karen Theresa Burke, "International Transfers of Stolen Cultural Property: Should Thieves Continue to Benefit from Domestic Laws Favoring Bona Fide Purchasers?" 13 : 427-463, 1990
18 Patty Gerstenblith, "International Art and Cultural Heritage" 45 : 395-408, 2011
19 Bert Demarsin, "Has the Time (of Laches) Come? Recent Nazi-Era Art Litigation in the New York Forum" 59 : 621-658, 2011
20 Spoliation Advisory Panel, "Dep't for Culture"
21 James L. Buchwalter, "Contracts Relating to Conveyances of Real Property, 19A N.Y. Jur. 2d Conflict of Laws § 26"
22 Katja Lubina, "Contested Cultural Property: The Return of Nazi Spoilated Art and Human Remains from Public Collections" 2009
23 Joseph W. Glannon, "Conflict of Laws in Massachusetts Part I: Current Choice-of-Law Theory" 92 : 12-, 2009
24 Michele Kunitz, "Comment, Switzerland & the International Trade in Art & Antiquities" 21 : 519-541, 2001
25 Lee Ann Houseman, "Comment, Current Practices and Problems in Combatting Illegality in the Art Market" 12 : 506-538, 1982
26 "Black's Law Dictionary 8th ed." 891-, 2004
27 Leila Anglade, "Art, Law and the Holocaust: The French Situation" 4 : 301-307, 1999
28 Jessica L. Darraby, "Art, 1 Artifact, Architecture and Museum Law § 2:65 (2008)(citing Guggenheim Found., 569 N.E.2d 426)"
29 Meghan A. Sherlock, "A Combined Discovery Rule and Demand and Refusal Rule for New York: The Need for Equitable Consistency in International Cases of Recovery of Stolen Art and Cultural Property" 8 : 483-489, 2000
30 Symeon C. Symeonides, "A Choice-of-Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Property" 38 : 1177-, 2005
31 "77 Am. Jur. 3d Proof of Facts 259, at § 32"
32 Alan J. Jacobs, "18 Am. Jur. 2d Conversion § 1"
33 "1 Maryland Law Encyclopedia Actions § 29 (West 1998)"