RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      中島敦文学と植民地主義 - 朝鮮․満州․南洋群島の軌跡 - = The Literary Works by Atsushi Nakajima and the Colonialism - The Locus of Chosen, Manchuria, and the South Sea Islands -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104882779

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this article, we shall analyze Atsushi Nakajima’s literary works featuring Chosen, Manchuria, and the South Sea Islands, tracing the transitions of Nakajima’s recognition of the Colonialism. Firstly, “Junsa-no Iru Fukei (巡査の居る風景...

      In this article, we shall analyze Atsushi Nakajima’s literary works featuring Chosen, Manchuria, and the South Sea Islands, tracing the transitions of Nakajima’s recognition of the Colonialism. Firstly, “Junsa-no Iru Fukei (巡査の居る風景)” describes, with a tense mood, the scenes where the Chosen people, who were ruled during the colonial period, experienced the confusions and contradictions concerning their identities, had the hidden intention for the independence of Chosen, and suffered from the violence of the Imperial Japan. Secondly, “D-shi Shichigatsu Jokei (D市七月叙景 (一)),” a literary work of Manchuria, dramatically contrasts the Japanese residents with the Chinese laborers with reference to the South Manchuria Railway. In this piece of work, we find the criticism of the Colonialism of the Imperial Japan, which was based on the sacrifice of the other tribes. The author, however, did not shed light on the substantial aspects of the Chinese people; it appears that the author wrote this work in the lights of his thoughts on both Japan and China, rather than from the perspective specifically relating to China. Thirdly, “Fubutsu Shou (風物抄)” describes, with an exotic mood, the natural landscape of the South Sea islands as well as the life of the native people there. At the heart of this work, however, lies Nakajima’s recognition of the South Sea area as an uncivilized region, contrasted with Japan, a modernized country in his view. Through the systematic analyses of these three literary works, we conclude that as the theme of Nakajima’s works changed from Chosen, Manchuria, to the South Sea Island, his recognition of the colonialism also changed from his support to the local people’s opposition to the Imperial Japan’s colonialism, his neutral position as to the issue, to his biased view on the South Sea area as an uncivilized region.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      本稿は中島敦が朝鮮․満州․南洋群島を舞台に書いた作品の分析を通して、彼の植民地主義に対する認識の変遷を辿ったものである。まず朝鮮を舞台にした「巡査の居る風景」には、植...

      本稿は中島敦が朝鮮․満州․南洋群島を舞台に書いた作品の分析を通して、彼の植民地主義に対する認識の変遷を辿ったものである。まず朝鮮を舞台にした「巡査の居る風景」には、植民地支配状況の中で被支配者である朝鮮人が経験する自己アイデンティティーの混乱と矛盾や、朝鮮の独立に対する秘められた意志、そして帝国日本の暴力によって犠牲となった被支配民族の受難の模様などが描かれている。次に満州を舞台した「D市七月叙景(一)」には、南満州鉄道の存在を意識しながら、日本人居留民と中国人労働者の日常が劇的に対比されており、基本的には異民族の犠牲の上に成り立っている帝国日本の植民地主義に対する批判が読み取れる。ただし、作家の眼差しが中国人の内面深いところまで行き届いておらず、やや中間者的な立ち位置をとっているきらいがある。最後に、南洋群島を舞台した「風物抄」では、南洋群島の自然風景と共にそこで出会った様々な原住民たちの生活像が異国情緒をもって描かれている。しかし、このような作品における表象の根底には、西欧化された日本を文明とし南洋群島を未開とする作家中島敦の南洋地域に対する認識が見え隠れする。このように中島敦文学における植民地主義に対する認識は、朝鮮から満州を経て南洋群島へと移動するにつれて、当地の異民族もしくは原住民に対する帝国日本の植民地主義への抵抗への支持から、中間者的な立場へと、さらに未開という偏見的な眼差しへと変遷したといえる。

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 勝又浩, "昭和作家のクロノトポス中 島敦" 双文社出版 9-19, 1992

      2 閻瑜, "新しい中島敦像―その苦悩․遍歴․救済" 桜美林大学北東アジア総合研究所 16-17, 2011

      3 渡邊一民, "中島敦論" みすず書房 142-, 2005

      4 川村湊, "中島敦誕生100年、永遠に越境する文学" 河出書房新社 2-15, 2009

      5 中島敦, "中島敦全集3" 筑摩書房 445-459, 1993

      6 中島敦, "中島敦全集2" 筑摩書房 91-112, 1993

      7 中島敦, "中島敦全集1" 筑摩書房 324-342, 1993

      8 中島敦, "中島敦全集1" 筑摩書房 343-373, 1993

      9 최준호, "中島敦の外地体験- 植民地朝鮮と南洋諸島を巡って -" 한국일본문화학회 (57) : 131-150, 2013

      1 勝又浩, "昭和作家のクロノトポス中 島敦" 双文社出版 9-19, 1992

      2 閻瑜, "新しい中島敦像―その苦悩․遍歴․救済" 桜美林大学北東アジア総合研究所 16-17, 2011

      3 渡邊一民, "中島敦論" みすず書房 142-, 2005

      4 川村湊, "中島敦誕生100年、永遠に越境する文学" 河出書房新社 2-15, 2009

      5 中島敦, "中島敦全集3" 筑摩書房 445-459, 1993

      6 中島敦, "中島敦全集2" 筑摩書房 91-112, 1993

      7 中島敦, "中島敦全集1" 筑摩書房 324-342, 1993

      8 中島敦, "中島敦全集1" 筑摩書房 343-373, 1993

      9 최준호, "中島敦の外地体験- 植民地朝鮮と南洋諸島を巡って -" 한국일본문화학회 (57) : 131-150, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.27
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.23 0.565 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼