선택집합의 변화를 통하여 도출된 선호도 및 유사성 정보를 활용한 포지셔닝 우위 평가

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Not only the preference data but also the similarity data can be used for developing effective marketing strategies. Hahn et al.[10] proposes a methodology of representing a brand(focal brand)’s competitors in a single map called the Preference-Similarity Map, according to their relative preference to and similarity with the focal brand. They also proposes a way to derive the relative preference and similarity values from the survey collecting the choice data from differing choice sets. This study identifies the limitations of the preference and similarity measures proposed by Hahn et al.[10] and shows how these measures can be revised. This study also proposes how to implement the revised measures and analyze brands’ positioning strategies. Based on the results of the previous studies on the effect of inter?brand similarity on brand evaluations, this study assumes that it is important to analyze how much a specific brand is preferred to its close competitors when evaluating the effectiveness of the brand’s positioning in the market. This study applies the proposed measures to the data used in Hahn et al.[10] and also show how the proposed measures are related to the parameters of the choice model proposed by Batsell and Polking[1].

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 도입
• Ⅱ. 선호도-유사성 지도
• Ⅲ. 새로 제안되는 선호도, 유사성 척도
• Ⅳ. 제시된 척도의 적용
• Ⅴ. 시사점 및 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hsee, C.K, "Will Product Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together" 25 : 175-186, 1998

2 Batsell, R.R., "Useful Mathematical Relationships Embedded in Tversky’s Elimination by Aspects Model" 47 : 538-544, 2003

3 Chernev, A., "The Impact of Common Features on Consumer Preferences：A Case of Confirmatory Reasoning" 27 : 475-488, 2001

4 Chernev, A., "The Effect of Common Features on Brand Choice：Moderating Role of Attribute Importance" 23 (23): 304-311, 1997

5 Hauser, J.R, "The Competitive Implication of Relevant Set/Response Analysis" 26 : 391-405, 1989

6 McFadden, D., "The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research" 5 : 272-297, 1986

7 Urban, G.L., "Testing Competitive Market Structure" 3 (3): 83-112, 1984

8 Tversky, A, "Substitutability and Similarity in Binary Choice" 6 : 1-12, 1969

9 Rumelhart, D.L, "Similarity Between Stimuli：An Experimental Test of the Luce and Restle Choice Models" 8 : 370-381, 1971

10 Krantz, D.J., "Rational Distance Functions for Multidimensional Scaling" 4 : 226-245, 1967

11 Tversky, A, "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions" 59 (59): 5251-5278, 1986

12 McFadden, D., "Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behavior of Individuals： Some Recent Developments" 1977

13 Coombs, C.H., "Psychology Scaling Without a Unit of Measurement" 57 : 145-158, 1950

14 Kahneman, D, "Prospect Theory：An analysis of decision under risk" 47 : 263-291, 1979

15 Tversky, A, "Preference Trees" 86 (86): 542-573, 1979

16 Carpenter, G.S, "Perceptual Position and Competitive Brand Strate gy in a Two‐Dimensional, Two Brand Market" 35 (35): 1029-1044, 1990

17 Kotler, P., "Marketing Management. 9th" Prentice Hall 1997

18 Huber, J, "Market Boundaries and Product Choice：Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects" 10 : 31-44, 1983

19 Luce, R.D., "Individual Choice Behavior：A Theoretical Analysis" John Wiley and Sons 1959

20 Kahn, B., "Experiments in Constrained Choice" 14 : 96-114, 1987

21 Tversky, A., "Elimination by Aspects：A Theory of Choice" 79 (79): 281-299, 1972

22 Day, G.S., "Customer‐Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product Markets" 43 : 8-19, 1979

23 Tversky, A, "Contrext‐ Dependent Preferences" 39 : 1179-1189, 1993

24 Hahn, M., "Context effects and context maps for positioning" MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY 48 (48): 155-177, 2006

25 Tversky, A., "Context Effects and Argument Based Choice" 1988

26 Carpenter, G.S, "Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage" 26 : 285-298, 1989

27 McFadden, D., "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in Frontier in Econometrics" Academic Press 105-142, 1973

28 Simonson, I, "Choice in Context：Tradeoff Contrast and Extreme Aversion" 29 : 281-295, 1992

29 Simonson, I., "Choice Based on Reasons：The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects" 16 : 158-174, 1989

30 Tybout, A.M, "Brand Positioning, in Kellogg on Marketing" John Wiley and Sons 2001

31 Huber, J., "Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives： Violation of Regularity and Similarity Hypothesis" 9 : 90-98, 1982

32 Won, E.J.S., "A Theoretical Investigation of the Effects of Similarity on Brand Choice Using the Elimination by Tree Model" 26 (26): 969-975, 2007

33 Debreu, G., "A Review of Individual Choice Behavior：A Theoretical Analysis" 50 : 186-188, 1960

34 Batsell, R.R, "A New Class of Market Share Models" 4 : 177-198, 1985