RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      수도권의 통근통학통행과 지역구조의 변화 = Commuting Trips and Changing Regional Structures in the Greater Seoul Metropolitan Area

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40105602

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The initiation of new town projects and the ongoing residential suburbanization within the Greater Seoul Metropolitan City Area entail the relocation of populations from Seoul to surrounding areas. The rearrangement of populations alongside the increase of manufacturing firms has caused significant changes in commuting patterns and regional structures at once. Whereas the configuration of person trips generated in 1990 identifies Seoul’s densely populated residential areas as major departing points, it was the new-town districts in the outskirt that emerged as the principal providers of commuting students and workers in 2000. With respect to the pulled trips, Jung-gu turned out to be the very place most frequently visited in 1990 and, in ten years, the destination changed to Gangnam-gu. The rearrangement of trip patterns during the decade shaped up new inter-region linkage systems in the Greater Seoul Metropolitan City Area. Factor analysis draws five common factors in 1990 and the number increases to six in 2000 with the addition of a supplementary commuting zone from new towns to Seoul. In all, Seoul Metropolitan Area’s commuting comes to take place in more complicated ways and within a wider bound in the year 2000 than was the case ten years before, which signals the declining functional position of the capital city in the Greater Metropolitan Area.
      번역하기

      The initiation of new town projects and the ongoing residential suburbanization within the Greater Seoul Metropolitan City Area entail the relocation of populations from Seoul to surrounding areas. The rearrangement of populations alongside the increa...

      The initiation of new town projects and the ongoing residential suburbanization within the Greater Seoul Metropolitan City Area entail the relocation of populations from Seoul to surrounding areas. The rearrangement of populations alongside the increase of manufacturing firms has caused significant changes in commuting patterns and regional structures at once. Whereas the configuration of person trips generated in 1990 identifies Seoul’s densely populated residential areas as major departing points, it was the new-town districts in the outskirt that emerged as the principal providers of commuting students and workers in 2000. With respect to the pulled trips, Jung-gu turned out to be the very place most frequently visited in 1990 and, in ten years, the destination changed to Gangnam-gu. The rearrangement of trip patterns during the decade shaped up new inter-region linkage systems in the Greater Seoul Metropolitan City Area. Factor analysis draws five common factors in 1990 and the number increases to six in 2000 with the addition of a supplementary commuting zone from new towns to Seoul. In all, Seoul Metropolitan Area’s commuting comes to take place in more complicated ways and within a wider bound in the year 2000 than was the case ten years before, which signals the declining functional position of the capital city in the Greater Metropolitan Area.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.22 1.22 1.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.07 1.01 1.261 0.34
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼