RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국내외 가정의학 전공의 교육 수련 제도 비교 = Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Family Medicine Residency Education and Training Systems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109752086

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This review provides a structural comparison of education and training programs for family medicine residents in South Korea, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Across these nations, comprehensive, continuous, and patient-centered care is considered essential for strengthening primary healthcare. Accordingly, each country has implemented competency-based training tailored to its healthcare context.
      Despite this shared goal, residency programs differ in duration, clinical training models, curricular content, and post-training pathways. The typical duration of training is three years. Canada offers the shortest training at two years, whereas the UK and Australia require up to five to six years when including pre-residency components. While the core curricula are broadly similar, countries other than South Korea generally place greater emphasis on outpatient-based training. Additionally, differences exist in post-residency opportunities—such as training in rural or addiction medicine— which reflect national healthcare priorities and needs. By systematically analyzing the strengths and limitations of each system, this review aims to suggest improvements to Korea’s family medicine training framework and support the development of competent primary care physicians suited to the Korean healthcare environment.
      번역하기

      This review provides a structural comparison of education and training programs for family medicine residents in South Korea, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Across these nations, comprehensive, continuous, and patient-ce...

      This review provides a structural comparison of education and training programs for family medicine residents in South Korea, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Across these nations, comprehensive, continuous, and patient-centered care is considered essential for strengthening primary healthcare. Accordingly, each country has implemented competency-based training tailored to its healthcare context.
      Despite this shared goal, residency programs differ in duration, clinical training models, curricular content, and post-training pathways. The typical duration of training is three years. Canada offers the shortest training at two years, whereas the UK and Australia require up to five to six years when including pre-residency components. While the core curricula are broadly similar, countries other than South Korea generally place greater emphasis on outpatient-based training. Additionally, differences exist in post-residency opportunities—such as training in rural or addiction medicine— which reflect national healthcare priorities and needs. By systematically analyzing the strengths and limitations of each system, this review aims to suggest improvements to Korea’s family medicine training framework and support the development of competent primary care physicians suited to the Korean healthcare environment.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼