Using causal process tracing methods, argument analysis, and competing hypotheses analysis (ACH), this study examines the mechanisms of “de-securitization” of security concerns that occurred during the in-country hosting of Special Contributors in...
Using causal process tracing methods, argument analysis, and competing hypotheses analysis (ACH), this study examines the mechanisms of “de-securitization” of security concerns that occurred during the in-country hosting of Special Contributors in Afghanistan in 2021. The findings of the study are as follows. First, “rescue and entry,” “community acceptance,” “stay and resettlement support,” and “social reaction” were identified as the main discourses. The sentiments associated with the main discourses in the case were positive at the beginning of the special contributors’ arrival in the country, but negative sentiments began to emerge as the discussion of the case became linked to Muslim culture. Second, there was not enough evidence to collectively substantiate the proposition of politicization as a precursor to securitization. Third, we found that the processual mechanisms of “immediate acceptance of the issue into the government's policy agenda” and “audience support for the government's early response” allowed the issue of social conflict caused by the influx of migrants into the country to no longer be perceived as an existential threat by the public, and thus allowed for an early transition to the “de-securitization” stage.