A Study of Competition Law and Intellectual Property in the EU: Comparative Perspectives in Licensing Agreements

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although competition or antitrust laws in different jurisdictions vary in enforcement, they have an unambiguous factor in common. That is the control on the oppressive use of market power. Therefore, implementation of competition law means challenging the firms that possess market power or exercise a similar power through agreements. Powers by means of intellectual property rights (IPRs) are no exception. It is true that there has been a never-ending conflicting opinion which has persistently claimed antitrust challenges for protecting the process of innovation by a vigorous competition.
The intersection of IPRs and antitrust has, therefore, brought attention to scholars. One of the main objectives of competition law is to improve competition in the market, by means of preventing acts of abuse of market dominance or anti-competitive agreements. On the contrary, the IPRs allow firms to stimulate invention through permitting IP owners to exploit their market power. This seems that there is some conflict between these two areas. However, they are understood as in harmony since both eventually aim at achieving the goal for social welfare or efficiency.
For this complex reason, most countries that legislate competition law also provide exemption regulations or guidelines for approving benign technology licensing. This article studies various legal techniques in the EU, the US, and Korea, illustrating the convergence through establishing the regulations and guidelines. It is somewhat difficult to decide whether positive outcome from a certain licensing agreement can offset anti-competitive one. However, a study of comparative law can offer a significant and diverse answers for the problem. Therefore, this article aims to provide a better solution for the existing problems in antitrust provisions on IPRs.
This article explains the substantive law of EU competition law, including the unique block exemption provision on technology transfer, and compares it with reference to the current provisions on IPRs in the US and Korea. Then, it discusses the benefits from learning the EU block exemption regulation for its legal certainty outcomes. The provisions of the EU have proved their positive outcomes such as ensuring legal certainty through market share threshold guidance with hard-core prohibition. The Korean competition authorities can learn much from these legal techniques.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최승재, "지식재산권 부당한 행사에 대한 현행 가이드라인에 관한 연구" 한국경쟁법학회 22 : 307-337, 2010

2 "http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/0558.pdf"

3 EU Commission, "http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010: 335:0036:0042:EN:PDF"

4 "http://eng.ftc.go.kr/bbs.do"

5 Marco Colino, Sandra, "Vertical Agreements and Competition Law: A Comparative Study of the EU and US Regimes" Hart 2010

6 Elhauge, Einer, "United States Antitrust Law and Economics" Thomson/West 2008

7 Pitofsky, Robert, "Trade Regulation: Cases and Materials, Sixth Edition" Foundation Press 2010

8 Gilbert, Richard J, "Ties That Bind: Policies to Promote (Good) Patent Pools" 77 (77): 1-48, 2010

9 최요섭, "The Vertical Regulation of Economics in the EU: Ten Years of Experience" 한국경쟁법학회 21 : 185-215, 2010

10 Bernard, Catherine, "The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms, Third Edition" Oxford University 2010

11 Barnard, "The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms" Oxford University 2004

12 최요섭, "The Meaning of Consumer Welfare in Competition Law Revisited" 법학연구소 34 (34): 215-237, 2010

13 Sullivan, "The Law of Antitrust: An Integrated Handbook, Second Edition" Paul, MN 2006

14 Kallay, Dina, "The Law and Economics of Antitrust and Intellectual Property: An Austrian Approach" Edward Elgar 2004

15 Myers, Gary, "The Intersection of Antitrust and Intellectual Property: Cases and Materials" Paul, MN 2007

16 Anderman, Steven, "The IP and Competition Interface: New Developments, In Intellectual Property and Competition Law" Oxford University Press 3-25, 2011

17 Hartley, T.C, "The Foundations of European Union Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Union, Seventh Edition" Oxford University 2010

18 Choi, Yo Sop, "The Enforcement and Development of Korean Competition Law" 33 (33): 301-315, 2010

19 Bishop, "The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Application and Measurement, Third Edition" Sweet & Maxwell 2010

20 Landes, William, "The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law" Harvard University 2003

21 Brodley, "The Economic Goals of Antitrust: Efficiency, Consumer Welfare, and Technological Progress" 62 : 1020-1031, 1987

22 Fox, Eleanor, "The Competition Law of the European Union: In Comparative Perspective" West, St. Paul 2009

23 Bork, Robert, "The Antitrust Paradox: Policy at War with Itself" Free 1993

24 Hovenkamp, Herbert, "The Antitrust Enterprise: Principles and Execution" Harvard University 2005

25 Shapiro, Carl, "Technology Cross-Licensing Practices: FTC v. Intel (1999), In The Antitrust Revolution: Economics, Competition, and Policy, Fourth Edition" Oxford University Press 350-372, 1999

26 Choi, Sung-Jai, "Regulation on the Patent Misuse through Antitrust Law" Sechang 2010

27 Whish, "Recent Developments in Community Competition Law 1998/99" 25 (25): 219-246, 2000

28 Drexl, "Real Knowledge is to Know the Extent of One’s Own Ignorance: On the Consumer Harm Approach in Innovation-Related Competition Cases" 76 (76): 677-708, 2010

29 Lopatka, John, "Monopolization, Innovation, and Consumer Welfare" 69 : 367-424, 2001

30 Carlton, Dennis, "Modern Industrial Organization, Fourth Edition" Addison-Wesley 2005

31 Gerber, David J, "Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus" Oxford University 2003

32 Dabbah, Maher M, "International and Comparative Competition Law" Cambridge University 2010

33 Merges, Robert P, "Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age, Fourth Edition" Wolters Kluwer 2007

34 Burtis, Michelle, "Intellectual Property and Antitrust Limitations on Contract, In Dynamic Competition and Public Policy: Technology, Innovation, and Antitrust Issues" Cambridge University Press 229-263, 2005

35 Valentine, "Intellectual Property and Antitrust"

36 Jorde, Thomas, "Innovation, Cooperation, and Antitrust”, in Antitrust, Innovation, and Competitiveness" in Jorde,Thomas & Teece,David(editors),Antitrust,Innovation,and Competitiveness,Oxford University Press,New York 47-70, 1992

37 Carrier, "Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law" Oxford University 2009

38 Fox, Eleanor, "How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S" Oxford University 77-88, 2008

39 "Harper-Perennial" 1976

40 Enchelmaier, Stefan, "Hardcore Restrictions in Technology Transfer Agreements under Regulation (EC) 722/2004, In Intellectual Property and Competition Law" Oxford University 411-432, 2011

41 Fox, Eleanor, "Global Issues in Antitrust and Competition Law" Paul, MN 2010

42 Elhauge, "Global Competition Law and Economics" Hart Publishing 2007

43 Hovenkamp, Herbert, "Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its Practice, Third Edition" Paul, MN 2005

44 Francis, Daniel, "Exclusion, Invasion and Abuse: Competition Law and Its Constitutional Context, In The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies" Hart Publishing 183-224, 2010

45 Viscusi, "Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, Fourth Edition" MIT 2005

46 Shin, Hyun Yoon, "Economic Law (Kyoung-jae-beob), Third Edition" Beobmunsa 2010

47 최요섭, "EU Competition Policy Via Controlling State Aid" 국제지역연구센터 13 (13): 303-322, 2010

48 Jones, Alison, "EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Fourth Edition" Oxford University 2011

49 Anderman, Steven, "EU Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: The Regulation of Innovation, Second Edition" Oxford University 2011

50 "EU Commission"

51 Buttigieg, "Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest: A Comparative Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law" Alphen aan den Rijn 2009

52 Whish, "Competition Law, Sixth Edition" Oxford University 2009

53 Fox, Eleanor, "Competition Law, In International Economic Law, Second Edition" Oxford University Press 417-464, 2008

54 Furse, Mark, "Competition Law of the EC and UK, Sixth Edition" Oxford Press 2008

55 Kennedy, Kevin, "Competition Law and the World Trade Organization: The Limits of Multilateralism" Sweet & Maxwell 2001

56 Gerber, David, "Competition Law and the WTO: Rethinking the Relationship”, in The Future of International Economic Law" Oxford University 269-286, 2008

57 Maher, Imelda, "Competition Law Modernization: An Evolution Tale?, In The Evolution of EU Law, Second Edition" Oxford University Press 717-741, 2011

58 Choi, Yo Sop, "Comparative Analysis of Competition Laws on Buyer Power in Korea and Japan" 33 (33): 499-519, 2010

59 Arquit, "Canaries in the Coal Mine: Has Neo-Classical Economics Lost Ground at the Intersection of IP Licensing and Antitrust Law in the United States?”, in Intellectual Property and Competition Law" Oxford University 433-460, 2011

60 Posner, Richard, "Antitrust in the New Economy" 68 : 925-943, 2001

61 Goetz, Charles J, "Antitrust Law: Interpretation and Implementation" Foundation Press 2009

62 Hylton, Keith, "Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Tradition" Cambridge University 2003

63 Posner, Richard, "Antitrust Law, Second Edition" University of Chicago 2001

64 Gavil, Andrew, "Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concepts and Problems in Competition Law, Second Edition" Thomson/West, St. Paul 2008

65 Leslie, Christopher, "Antitrust Law and Intellectual Property Rights: Cases and Materials" Oxford University 2011

66 "Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition"

67 Areeda, "Antitrust Analysis: Problems, Text, and Cases, Sixth Edition" Aspen 2004

68 Choi, Yo Sop, "Analysis of the Microsoft, Intel and Qualcomm Decisions in Korea" 31 (31): 470-475, 2010

69 Slot, "An Introduction to Competition Law" Hart 2006

70 "An Introduction to Comparative Law, Third Edition" Oxford University 1998-,

71 Choi, Yo Sop, "Adoption of New Block Exemption Regulations in the European Union" 2 (2): 59-74, 2010